Chasing after the wind? Green economy strategies, path creation and transitions in the offshore wind industry

REFERENCES

• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2003). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. SPRU, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., & Gong, H. (2021). Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: New-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., Květoň, V., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., & Trippl, M. (2020). The dark side of regional industrial path development: Towards a typology of trajectories of decline. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1455–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremerhavener Gesellschaft für Investitionsförderung und Stadtentwicklung (BIS). (2012). Offshore wind report. Economic Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Bremerhavener Gesellschaft für Investitionsförderung und Stadtentwicklung (BIS). (2013). Bremerhaven: More than just a port for the offshore wind industry. Economic Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Bremerhavener Gesellschaft für Investitionsförderung und Stadtentwicklung (BIS). (2016). Mooring in Bremerhaven: Sustainable business, future-oriented growth. Economic Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso, M., Iverson, E. J., Klitkou, A., & Sandven, T. (2017). Empirical research avenues for regional policy elaboration (NIFU Working Paper 2017:15). NIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Hassink, R. (2020). Multi-scalar knowledge bases for new regional industrial path development: Toward a typology. European Planning Studies, 28(12), 2489–2507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1724265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Raven, R., & Verbong, G. (2010). Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages. Technology in Society, 32(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2011). Transition regions: Regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Progress in Planning, 76(3), 105–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, D., MacKinnon, D., & Pollock, R. (2019). Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: Regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., & Pike, A. (2015). Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. (2012). Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 791–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). The European green deal. COM (2019) 640 final. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fastenrath, S., & Braun, B. (2018). Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: Energy-efficient building in Freiburg (Germany). Applied Geography, 90, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G. (2020). Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornahl, D., Hassink, R., Klaerding, C., Mossig, I., & Schröder, H. (2012). From the old path of shipbuilding onto the new path of offshore wind energy? The case of northern Germany. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., Gauske, A., Müller-Navarra, S., & Rosenhagen, G. (2016). Categorisation of meteorological conditions for storm tide episodes in the German Bight. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 25(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & O’Neill, K. (2014). The Green economy, sustainability transitions and transition regions: A case study of Boston. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2019). Green industry development in different types of regions. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2163–2183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1648385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsdóttir, H., Carton, W., Busch, H., & Ramasar, V. (2018). Modernist dreams and Green sagas: The neoliberal politics of Iceland’s renewable energy economy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1, 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618796829
   Google Scholar
• Haakonsson, S., Kirkegaard, J. K., & Lema, R. (2020). The decomposition of innovation in Europe and China’s catch-up in wind power technology: The role of KIBS. European Planning Studies, 28(11), 2174–2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1712329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Kester, J., Meelen, T., & Schwanen, T. (2020). Not more but different: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffee, D. (2015). ‘A deeper channel floats all boats’: The port economy as urban growth engine. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(4), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1068/a140346p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P., Purnell, P., & Velenturf, A. (2020). Highlighting the need to embed circular economy in low carbon decommissioning: The case of offshore wind. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). Industry legitimacy: Bright and dark phases in regional industry path development. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, A., Wurzel, R., Monaghan, E., & Osthorst, W. (2017). Climate change, the Green economy and reimagining the city: The case of structurally disadvantaged European maritime port cities. Die Erde, 148(4), 197–211. doi:10.12854/erde-148-49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, A. (2018). Framing industrialization of the offshore wind value chain – A discourse approach to an event. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 88, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Smith, A., Shaw, C., Raven, R., & Verhees, B. (2014). From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK. Energy Policy, 69, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labour Party. (2018). The Green transformation. www.labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-Green-Transformation-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Menzel, M.-P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., & Normann, H. E. (2019). Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 130, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Karlsen, A., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Afewerki, S., & Kenzhegaliyeva, A. (2021). Legitimation, institutions and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind. Regional Studies, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, S. M., & Stephens, J. C. (2012). Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: Analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in Central Massachusetts, USA. Sustainability Science, 7(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0164-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2020). Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njøs, R., Gunnar Sjøtun, S., Jakobsen, S.-E., & Fløysand, A. (2020). Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography, 96(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio-Cortez, A. (2019). House resolution 109 recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal, H.Res. 109, 116th Congress (2019–2020), United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, K., & Gibbs, D. (2020). Sustainability transitions and policy dismantling: Zero carbon housing in the UK. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 108, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Schot, J., & Berkhout, F. (2012). Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Sheldrick, A., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2017). Policy learning and sustainable urban transitions: Mobilising Berlin’s cycling renaissance. Urban Studies, 54(12), 2739–2762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016653889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2003). Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780623
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2018). Institutional agency and path creation: Institutional path from industrial to knowledge city. In A. Saksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New avenues for regional innovation systems – Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons (pp. 85–104). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2019). Place leadership and the challenge of transformation: Policy platforms and innovation ecosystems in promotion of green growth. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1748–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1634006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2020). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the north. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2018). Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stietzel, H.-J. (2016). Cuxhaven: Base port for the offshore wind industry in Germany. Presentation, Port Association of Cuxhaven, September 9.
   Google Scholar
• Stietzel, H.-J. (n.d.). Regionalökonomische Effekte der Ansiedlung von Siemens wind power in Cuxhaven. Stadt Cuxhaven.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S., & Pflitsch, G. (2018). Micro-dynamics in regional transition paths to sustainability – Insights from the Augsburg region. Applied Geography, 90, 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N., Sheppard, D., & Hume, N. (2021, March 8). The race to scale up green hydrogen. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgaartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2019). Green path development, asset modification and agency: Towards a systemic integrative approach. Papers in economic geography and innovation studies, 2019/01, University of Vienna/Vienna University of Economics and Business/Austrian Academy of Sciences/University of Agder/Kiel University. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/geo-disc-2019_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgaartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling Green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – A synthesis for policy makers. www.unep.org/greeneconomy
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A. J., Hekkert, M., Coenen, L., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Broadening the national focus in technological innovation system analysis: The case of offshore wind. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windenergie-Agentur Bremerhaven/Bremen (WAB). (2013). WAB: The network for wind energy: All skills on board. WAB.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., Moulton, J., Osthorst, W., Mederake, L., Deutz, P., & Jonas, A. (2019). Climate pioneership and leadership in structurally disadvantaged maritime port cities. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 146–166. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1522039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar