Spatial spillover effects of fiscal decentralization on governance and public administration quality

REFERENCES

• Altunbaş, Y., & Thornton, J. (2011). Fiscal decentralization and governance. Public Finance Review, 40(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142111424276
   Google Scholar
• Anh, V. T. T. (2016). Vietnam: Decentralization amidst fragmentation. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 33(2), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae33-2e
   Google Scholar
• Arikan, G. G. (2004). Fiscal decentralization: A remedy for corruption? International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011399.00053.a1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998). Two games of interjurisdictional competition when local governments provide industrial public goods. International Tax and Public Finance, 5(4), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008694605822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belotti, F., Hughes, G., & Mortari, A. P. (2017). Spatial panel-data models using Stata. The Stata Journal, 17(1), 139–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2012). Yardstick competition and policy learning in multi-level systems. Regional & Federal Studies, 22(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2012.688270
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, F., & Zenginobuz, U. (2007). The effect of spillovers on the provision of local public goods. Review of Economic Design, 11(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-006-0016-x
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M. G., & Glazer, A. (2002). Federal grants and yardstick competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, N., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2007). Yardstick competition and the political costs of raising taxes: An empirical analysis of Spanish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, E., Foucault, M., & Rota-Graziosi, G. (2015). Decentralization in Africa and the nature of local governments’ competition: Evidence from Benin. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(6), 1048–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9343-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, S., & Zheng, H. (2016). Climate change adaptation to escape the poverty trap: Role of the private sector. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(10), e01244. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1244
   Google Scholar
• CECODES, VFF-CRT, RTA & UNDP. (2019). The 2018 Viet Nam Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI): Measuring Citizens’ Experiences (Joint Policy Research Paper). Centre for Community Support and Development Studies (CECODES), Centre for Research and Training of the Viet Nam Fatherland Front (VFF-CRT), Real-Time Analytics (RTA), and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. P. (2016). Fiscal decentralization, rural industrialization and undocumented labour mobility in rural China, 1982–87. Regional Studies, 50(9), 1469–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1034666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mello, L., & Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis. International Monetary Fund (IMF).
   Google Scholar
• De Siano, R., & D’Uva, M. (2017). Fiscal decentralization and spillover effects of local government public spending: The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 51(10), 1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1208814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Bo, C. F., & Florio, M. (2012). Infrastructure and growth in a spatial framework: Evidence from the EU regions. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.680587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, H., & Zhan, J. V. (2011). Fiscal transfer and local public expenditure in China: A case study of Shanxi province. China Review, 11(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_19
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Spatial panel data models. In M. M. Fischer, & A. Getis (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis (pp. 377–407). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. P., & Freret, S. (2009). Evidence of political yardstick competition in France using a two-regime spatial Durbin model with fixed effects. Journal of Regional Science, 49(5), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraresi, M., Migali, G., & Rizzo, L. (2018). Spillover effects in local public spending. Regional Studies, 52(11), 1570–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1415429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garman, C., Haggard, S., & Willis, E. (2001). Fiscal decentralization: A political theory with Latin American cases. World Politics, 53(2), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., & Overman, H. G. (2012). Mostly pointless spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2012.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golgher, A. B., & Voss, P. R. (2016). How to interpret the coefficients of spatial models: Spillovers, direct and indirect effects. Spatial Demography, 4(3), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0016-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guermat, C., & Harris, R. D. (2002). Robust conditional variance estimation and value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 4(2), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2002.060
   Google Scholar
• Han, V. X., & Baumgarte, R. (2000). Economic reform, private sector development, and the business environment in Viet Nam. Comparative Economic Studies, 42(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2000.13
   Google Scholar
• Hankla, C. R. (2009). When is fiscal decentralization good for governance? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(4), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huther, J., & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate on fiscal decentralization. Vol. 1894. World Bank Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2011). Decentralization and corruption: New cross-country evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1081r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-R. (2013). Local government policy diffusion in a decentralised system: Childbirth support policy in South Korea. Local Government Studies, 39(4), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.726200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koide, H. (1988). Spatial provision of local public goods with spillover effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(85)90017-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, I., Lago-Peñas, S., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2020). Decentralization after the Great Recession: Fine-tuning or paradigm change? Regional Studies, 54(7), 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1711878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Dominguez, M. (2012). The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis. Public Choice, 150(3), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9714-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2011). Pitfalls in higher order model extensions of basic spatial regression methodology. Review of Regional Studies, 41(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8141
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. D. (2017). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: The perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytikäinen, T. (2012). Tax competition among local governments: Evidence from a property tax reform in Finland. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7–8), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruichi, D., & Abe, M. (2019). Corruption and the business environment in Vietnam: Implications from an empirical study. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, N., Malesky, E., & Duc, N. N. (2013). Does better provincial governance boost private investment in Vietnam? IDS Working Papers, 2013(414), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2013.00414.x
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. L., Stewart, L. M., & Hamman, J. A. (2017). The diffusion of TIF districts among local governments. International Review of Public Administration, 22(4), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2017.1412047
   Google Scholar
• Ndiaye, Y. (2018). Road tax interactions among local governments: A spatial panel data analysis of the French case over the period 1984–2000. Applied Economics, 50(38), 4182–4196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1441518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B., Mickiewicz, T., & Du, J. (2018). Local governance and business performance in Vietnam: The transaction costs’ perspective. Regional Studies, 52(4), 542–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1341625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Que, W., Zhang, Y., & Liu, S. (2018a). The spatial spillover effect of fiscal decentralization on local public provision: Mathematical application and empirical estimation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 331, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Que, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., & Yang, C. (2018b). The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization and factor market segmentation on environmental pollution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rab, H. N., Martinez-Vasquez, J., Shah, A. M., Vu, Q. H., Nguyen, M. V., Monkam, K. F. N., Prasad, A., Doan, Q. H., & Iyer, I. (2015). Fiscal decentralization review in Vietnam: Making the whole greater than the sum the parts: Summary report (English). World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/389051468187138185/Summary-report
   Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative Federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, B., & Smart, M. (2006). The efficiency Consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00255.x
   Google Scholar
• Santolini, R. (2008). A spatial cross-sectional analysis of political trends in Italian municipalities. Papers in Regional Science, 87(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepulveda, C. F., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The consequences of fiscal decentralization on poverty and income equality. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1033r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shon, J. (2018). Sales Tax competition among state–local governments: Evidence from the US counties. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(8), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1280820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thang, N. V., Thang, B. N., Thanh, L. Q., & Canh, L. Q. (2015). Local governance, corruption and public service quality: Evidence from a national survey in Viet Nam (Joint Policy Research Paper on Governance and Participation). Asia–Pacific Institute for Management (National Economics University) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
   Google Scholar
• Thanh, S. D., & Canh, N. P. (2019). Local governance: Impacts of fiscal decentralization on government size and spending composition in Vietnam. Asian Economic Journal, 33(4), 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanh, S. D., & Canh, N. P. (2020). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth of Vietnamese provinces: The role of local public governance. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 91(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kamp, D., Lorentzen, P., & Mattingly, D. (2017). Racing to the bottom or to the top? Decentralization, revenue pressures, and governance reform in China. World Development, 95, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thang, N., & Freeman, N. J. (2009). State-owned enterprises in Vietnam: Are they ‘crowding out’ the private sector? Post-Communist Economies, 21(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370902778674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Védrine, L. (2020). Allocation of European structural funds, decentralization and strategic spatial interactions. Regional Studies, 54(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1455000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, C., & Wu, Y. (2020). Stay or go? Intra-government tax competition and firms' location decisions in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(14), 3320–3350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1694892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, N., de Jong, M., Storm, S., & Mi, J. (2013). Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure: Evidence from Chinese regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar