551
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Electoral strategies in multilevel systems: the effect of national politics on regional elections

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 844-856 | Received 14 Sep 2021, Published online: 07 Sep 2022

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J., & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000635
  • Bechtel, M. M. (2012). Not always second order: Subnational elections, national-level vote intentions, and volatility spillovers in a multi-level electoral system. Electoral Studies, 31(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.005
  • Bennie, L., & Clark, A. (2020). Labour Party adaptation to multilevel politics: Evidence from British general election manifestos. British Politics, 15(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019-00122-7
  • Benoit, K., Bräuninger, T., & Debus, M. (2009). Challenges for estimating policy preferences: Announcing an open access archive of political documents. German Politics, 18(3), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000903055856
  • Bolgherini, S., Grimaldi, S., & Paparo, A. (2021). Assessing multi-level congruence in voting in comparative perspective: Introducing the municipal level. Local Government Studies, 47(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1797692
  • Bräuninger, T., & Giger, N. (2018). Strategic ambiguity of party positions in multi-party competition. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.18
  • Brunner, M., & Debus, M. (2008). Between programmatic interests and party politics: The German Bundesrat in the legislative process. German Politics, 17(3), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000802300288
  • Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945–1998. Oxford University Press.
  • Bussjäger, P., & Johler, M. M. (2021). Power-sharing in Austria: Consociationalism, corporatism, and federalism. In S. Keil, & A. McCulloch (Eds.), Power-sharing in Europe. Past practice, present cases, and future directions (pp. 43–66). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cabeza, L. (2018). ‘First-order thinking’ in second-order contests: A comparison of local, regional and European elections in Spain. Electoral Studies, 53, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.03.004
  • Cabeza, L., Gómez, B., & Alonso, S. (2017). How national parties nationalize regional elections: The case of Spain. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw030
  • Campbell, J. E. (1986). Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative elections. American Political Science Review, 80(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957083
  • Carson, J. L., Sievert, J., & Williamson, R. D. (2020). Nationalization and the incumbency advantage. Political Research Quarterly, 73(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919883696
  • Däubler, T. (2012a). The preparation and Use of election manifestos: Learning from the Irish case. Irish Political Studies, 27(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2012.636183
  • Däubler, T. (2012b). Wie entstehen wahlprogramme? Eine untersuchung zur landtagswahl in Baden-Württemberg 2006. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 22(3), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.5771/1430-6387-2012-3-333
  • Däubler, T., & Debus, M. (2009). Government formation and policy formulation in the German states. Regional and Federal Studies, 19(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802692322
  • De Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2020). Political entrepreneurs. The rise of challenger parties in Europe. Princeton University Press.
  • Detterbeck, K., & Hepburn, E. (2010). Party politics in multi-level systems: Party responses to new challenges in European democracies. In J. Erk, & W. Swenden (Eds.), New directions in federalism studies (pp. 106–125). Routledge/ECPR.
  • Detterbeck, K., & Hepburn, E. (2018). Statewide parties in western and Eastern Europe: Territorial patterns of party organizations. In K. Detterbeck, & E. Hepburn (Eds.), Handbook of territorial politics (pp. 120–138). Edward Elgar.
  • Dinkel, R. (1977). Der zusammenhang zwischen bundes- und landtagswahlergebnissen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 18(2–3), 348–359. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24196581
  • Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., & Winkler, A. K. (2012). The life cycle of party manifestos: The Austrian case. West European Politics, 35(4), 869–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.682349
  • Eder, N., Jenny, M., & Müller, W. C. (2017). Manifesto functions: How party candidates view and use their party’s central policy document’. Electoral Studies, 45, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.011
  • Elias, A., Basile, L., Franco-Guillén, N., & Szöcsik, E. (Forthcoming 2022). The framing territorial demands (FraTerr) dataset: A novel approach to conceptualizing and measuring regionalist actors’ territorial strategies. Regional & Federal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1964481
  • Erikson, R. S. (1988). The puzzle of midterm loss. The Journal of Politics, 50(4), 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131389
  • Fabre, E. (2011). Measuring party organization: The vertical dimension of the multi-level organization of state-wide parties in Spain and the UK. Party Politics, 17(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810376183
  • Giger, N., Müller, J., & Debus, M. (2011). Die bedeutung des regionalen kontexts für die programmatische positionierung von schweizer kantonalparteien. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02020.x
  • Golder, S. N., Lago, I., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Gschwend, T. (2017). Multi-level electoral politics: Beyond the second-order election model. Oxford University Press.
  • Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
  • Gross, M., & Debus, M. (2018). Does EU regional policy increase parties’ support for European integration?’. West European Politics, 41(3), 594–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1395249
  • Gross, M., & Jankowski, M. (2020). Dimensions of political conflict and party positions in multi-level democracies: Evidence from the Local Manifesto Project. West European Politics, 43(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1602816
  • Gross, M., & Krauss, S. (2021). Topic coverage of coalition agreements in multi-level settings: The case of Germany. German Politics, 30(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1658077
  • Han, K. J. (2020). Beclouding party position as an electoral strategy: Voter polarization, issue priority and position blurring. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000618
  • Harmel, R. (2018). The how’s and why’s of party manifestos. Some guidance for a cross-national research agenda’. Party Politics, 24(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816678880
  • Harmel, R., Tan, A. C., Janda, K., & Smith, J. M. (2018). Manifestos and the ‘two faces’ of parties. Party Politics, 24(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816648355
  • Hepburn, E., & Detterbeck, K. (2013). Federalism, regionalism and the dynamics of party politics. In J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, & W. Swenden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of regionalism & federalism (pp. 76–92). Routledge.
  • Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015575030
  • Hobolt, S., Tilley, J., & Banducci, S. (2013). Clarity of responsibility: How government cohesion conditions performance voting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02072.x
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Chapman Osterkatz S., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring regional authority: A postfunctionalist theory of governance, volume I. Oxford University Press.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. H. (2010). The rise of regional authority. A comparative study of 42 democracies. Routledge.
  • Jeffery, C., & Hough, D. (2001). The electoral cycle and multi-level voting in Germany. German Politics, 10(2), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/772713264
  • Jeffery, C., & Schakel, A. H. (2013). Editorial: Towards a regional political science. Regional Studies, 47(3), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.746443
  • Karlhofer, F., & Pallaver, G. (2013). Strength through weakness: State executive power and federal reform in Austria. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12017
  • Kavanagh, D. (1981). The politics of manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 34(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a054190
  • Kennedy, J., Sayers, A., & Alcantara, C. (2022). Does federalism prevent democratic accountability? Assigning responsibility for rates of COVID-19 testing. Political Studies Review, 20(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211001690
  • Kern, H. L., & Hainmueller, J. (2006). Electoral balancing, divided government and ‘midterm’ loss in German elections. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600738845
  • Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., & McDonald, M. D. (2006). Mapping policy preferences II: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European union and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford University Press.
  • Klüver, H., & Sagarzazu, I. (2016). Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics, 39(2), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295
  • Kropp, S., & Behnke, N. (2016). Marble cake dreaming of layer cake: The merits and pitfalls of disentanglement in German federalism reform. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(5), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1236335
  • Laver, M. (2014). Measuring policy positions in political space. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061413-041905
  • Laver, M., & Garry, J. (2000). Estimating policy positions from political texts. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669268
  • León, S. (2011). Who is responsible for what? Clarity of responsibilities in multilevel states: The case of Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 80–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01921.x
  • León, S., & Orriols, L. (2016). Asymmetric federalism and economic voting. European Journal of Political Research, 55(4), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12148
  • Libbrecht, L., Maddens, B., Swenden, W., & Fabre, E. (2009). Issue salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 48(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00820.x
  • Loughlin, J. (2013). Reconfiguring the nation-state: Hybridity vs. uniformity. In J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, & W. Swenden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of regionalism & federalism (pp. 3–18). Routledge.
  • Maddens, B., & Libbrecht, L. (2009). How statewide parties cope with the regionalist issue: The case of Spain; A directional approach. In W. Swenden, & B. Maddens (Eds.), Territorial party politics in Western Europe (pp. 204–228). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Massetti, E., & Schakel, A. H. (2016). Between autonomy and secession: Decentralization and regionalist party ideological radicalism. Party Politics, 22(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813511380
  • Matthieß, T. (2020). Retrospective pledge voting: A comparative study of the electoral consequences of government parties’ pledge fulfilment’. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 774–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12377
  • Mueller, S., & Bernauer, J. (2018). Party unity in federal disunity: Determinants of decentralised policy-seeking in Switzerland. West European Politics, 41(3), 565–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1395254
  • Müller, J. (2009). The impact of the socio-economic context on the länder parties’ policy positions’. German Politics, 18(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000903055815
  • Müller, J. (2013). On a short leash? Sub-national party positions between regional context and national party unity. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.742092
  • Müller, S., & Louwerse, T. (2020). The electoral cycle effect in parliamentary democracies. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(4), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.47
  • Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (1999). Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nyhuis, D., & König, P. (2018). Estimating the conflict dimensionality in the German länder from vote advice applications, 2014–2017. Statistics, Politics and Policy, 9(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0007
  • Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
  • Praprotnik, K. (2017). Parteien und ihre wahlversprechen. Einblicke in die politikgestaltung in Österreich. Springer VS.
  • Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
  • Schakel, A. H. (2013). Congruence between regional and national elections. Comparative Political Studies, 46(5), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011424112
  • Schakel, A. H. (2015). How to analyze second-order election effects? A refined second-order election model. Comparative European Politics, 13(6), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.16
  • Schakel, A. H. (2018). Rethinking European elections: The importance of regional spillover into the European electoral arena. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(3), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12712
  • Schakel, A. H. (2021). Regional spillover into third-order European elections. Governance, 34(3), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12434
  • Schakel, A. H., & Jeffery, C. (2013). Are regional elections really ‘second-order’ elections? Regional Studies, 47(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.690069
  • Schakel, A. H., & Romanova, V. (2021). Horizontal and vertical spill-over in multilevel electoral systems. Regional & Federal Studies, 31(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1934455
  • Shair-Rosenfield, S., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Chapman-Osterkatz, S. (2021). Language difference and regional authority. Regional & Federal Studies, 31(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1831476
  • Shikano, S., & Nyhuis, D. (2019). The effect of incumbency on ideological and valence perceptions of parties in multilevel polities. Public Choice, 181(3–4), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00659-7
  • Somer-Topcu, Z. (2015). Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12165
  • Somer-Topcu, Z., & Zar, M. E. (2014). European parliamentary elections and national party policy change. Comparative Political Studies, 47(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488552
  • Spoon, J.-J., Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2014). Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12032
  • Spoon, J.-J., & Klüver, H. (2014). Do parties respond? How electoral context influences party responsiveness. Electoral Studies, 35, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014
  • Stecker, C. (2015). Parties on the chain of federalism: Position-taking and multi-level party competition in Germany. West European Politics, 38(6), 1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1029366
  • Stecker, C. (2016). The effects of federalism reform on the legislative process in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies, 26(5), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1236334
  • Strøm, K., & Müller, W. C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In W. C. Müller, & K. Strom (Eds.), Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard choices (pp. 1–35). Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Thorlakson, L. (2009). Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics, 15(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808099979
  • Thorlakson, L. (2020). Multi-level democracy. Integration and independence Among party systems, parties, and voters in seven federal systems. Oxford University Press.
  • van de Voorde, N., Bouteca, N., Schamp, T., & Steyvers, K. (2018). Birds of a feather or by note? Ideological nationalization of local electoral manifestos in Belgium. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4335/10.4335/16.1.1-24(2018)
  • van de Wardt, M. (2014). Putting the damper On: Do parties de-emphasize issues in response to internal divisions among their supporters. Party Politics, 20(3), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436047
  • van de Wardt, M., De Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Exploiting the cracks: Wedge issues in multiparty competition. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000565
  • Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
  • Watts, R. L. (2013). Typologies of federalism. In J. Loughlin, J. Kincaid, & W. Swenden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of regionalism & federalism (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
  • Wilkerson, J., & Casas, A. (2017). Large-scale computerized text analysis in political science: Opportunities and challenges. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025542

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.