Institutions and territorial structuring: the transformation of the dairy sector in France and Germany

REFERENCES

• Aggeri, F., & Hatchuel, A. (2003). Ordres socio-économiques et polarisation de la recherche dans l’agriculture: Pour une critique des rapports science/société. Sociologie du Travail, 45(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0296(02)01308-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire, G. (1988). Le modèle de développement agricole des années 1960. Économie Rurale, 184(1), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1988.3908
   Google Scholar
• Allaire, G. (2002). L'économie de la qualité, en ses secteurs, ses territoires et ses mythes. Géographie économie société, 4(2), 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Allaire, G. (2010). Applying economic sociology to understand the meaning of ‘quality’ in food markets. Agricultural Economics, 41, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00498.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire, G. (2018). The ambivalence of the capitalist socialisation of agriculture. In G. Allire, & B. Daviron (Eds.), Ecology, capitalism the new agricultural economy: The second great transformation (pp. 29–48). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Allaire, G., & Boyer, R. (1995). La grande transformation de l’agriculture: Lectures conventionnalistes et régulationnistes. Inra-Quae.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, M. (2007). Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137406000531
   Google Scholar
• Barthelemy, D., & Boinon, J.-P. (2001). La gestion des quotas laitiers dans quatre pays membres de l’Union européenne: Objectifs marchands versus objectifs non marchands. INRA Sciences Sociales, 2001(910-2016-71621). file:///Users/Marie/Downloads/iss01-12-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barthélémy, D. (2000). Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital: Le cas de l’agriculture. Économie Rurale, 260(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.1108
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli, P., & Boulet, D. (1990). Conditions d'une approche en termes de régulation sectorielle: Le cas de la sphère viticole. Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR). 17(905-2016-70539), 7-38.
   Google Scholar
• Benko, G., Dunford, M., & Lipietz, A. (1996). Les districts industriels revisités. In Dynamiques territoriales et mutations économiques (pp. 118–134). L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Y., Marchal, Y., Champanhet, F., & Riou, Y. (2015). Mise en œuvre de la contractualisation dans la filière laitière française (Rapport CGAAER).
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Does geographical proximity favour innovation? Économie et Institutions (6–7), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.926
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2012). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. In R. Martin, & M. Kitson (Eds.), Regional competitiveness (pp. 17–30). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2009). Some notes on institutions in evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography, 85(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouamra-Mechemache, Z., Jongeneel, R., & Réquillart, V. (2008). Impact of a gradual increase in milk quotas on the EU dairy sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(4), 461–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbn044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouttes, M. (2018). Evolution de la vulnérabilité des élevages laitiers permise par leur conversion à l'agriculture biologique (PhD thesis, Agronomie. Université de Toulouse).
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2003). Les institutions dans la théorie de la régulation. Cahiers d’Économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy, 44(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.3917/cep.044.0079
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., & Freyssenet, M. (2000). Les modèles productifs. La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (2005). Régulation theory: The state of the art. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, L. (2011). Food standards: The cacophony of governance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(10), 3247–3250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The economy of qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholez, C., et al. (2017). Field crop production contracts. Incentives and coordination under technical uncertainty in French cooperatives. Économie rurale, 4, 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. (1925). The stabilisation of prices and business. The American Economic Review, 15(1), 43–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1808478.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review, 648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. (1934). Institutional economics: Its place in political economy. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Daviron, B., & Allaire, G. (2019). Energy, biomass and hegemony: A long history of transformations of agricultures. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Derville, M., & Fink-Kessler, A. (2019). Institutional insights into contract theories: A comparative approach to the French and German dairy industries under liberalization. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 16(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908428.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervillé, M., & Allaire, G. (2014). Change of competition regime and regional innovative capacities: Evidence from dairy restructuring in France. Food Policy, 49, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervillé, M., Vandenbroucke, P., & Bazin, G. (2012). Suppression des quotas et nouvelles formes de régulation de l’économie laitière: Les conditions patrimoniales du maintien de la production laitière en montagne. Revue de la Régulation. Capitalisme, Institutions, Pouvoirs, 12 | 2e semestre / Autumn 2012, mis en ligne le 19 décembre 2012. http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/9848; https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.9848
   Google Scholar
• Desbois, D., & Nefussi, J. (2007). Signes de qualité: Prix du lait et rentabilité des exploitations. Agreste Cahiers, 3, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 51–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01003-8
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, C. (1995). La dimension sectorielle de la régulation. In R. Boyer, Y. Saillard & F. Michon (Eds.), Théories de la régulation, l’état des savoirs (pp. 313–322). La découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, C. (2002). La dimension sectorielle de la régulation. In R. Boyer & Y. Saillard (Eds.), Théorie de la régulation, l’état des savoirs (pp. 313–322). La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Fares, M., Magrini, M. B., & Triboulet, P. (2012). Agroecological transition, innovation and lock-in effects: The impact of the organizational design of supply chains. The French durum wheat supply chain case. Cahiers Agricultures, 21(1), 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favereau, O., et al. (2003). Where do markets come from? from (quality) conventions. In Favereau O., & Lazega E. (Eds.), Conventions and structures in economic organization. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fink-Kessler, A. (2013). Milch: vom Mythos zur Massenware. Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political–cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 656–673. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2006). Nonlinearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, M. (2019). NGO, LEH, Molkereien. Vortrag Milchtagung 2019: Milcherzeugung im öffentlichen Fokus: tiergerecht, umweltschonend und zu fairen Preisen. Warburg, Katholische Landvolkshochschule ‘Anton Heinen’ Hardehausen.
   Google Scholar
• IDELE. (2009). France laitière 2015 vers une accentuation des contrastes régionaux. Dossier Economie de I'elevagen, 391, 71.
   Google Scholar
• IDELE. (2015). Lait en Europe du nord: Forces, faiblesses et potentiels en 2020. Dossier Économie de L’élevage, 462, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongeneel, R. A., van Berkum, S., de Bont, C. J. A. M., van Bruchem, C., Helming, J. F. M., & Jager, J. H. (2010). European dairy policy in the years to come; quota abolition and competitiveness. Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Jürgens, K., & Fink-Keßler, A. (2015). Wertschöpfung von molkereien – eine fallstudie. In F.-K. Andrea, J. Karin, & I. Ottmar (Eds.), Zukunft der milcherzeugung in deutschland. Studie im auftrag der bundestagsfraktion (pp. 32–38). Bündnis 90/di Grünen.
   Google Scholar
• Jürgens, K., & Poppinga, O. (2013). Was kostet die erzeugung von milch? Berechnung der milcherzeugungs kosten in deutschland 2002 bis 2012. Gleichen und weitere ausgaben 1. Edited by. (ausgabe 1). Büro für Agrarsoziologie und Landwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2017). Contesting European regions. Regional Studies, 51(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, A., Kroll, J.-C., & Trouvé, A. (2017). Aides directes et environnement: La politique agricole commune en question. Économie Rurale. Agricultures, Alimentations, Territoires, 3(359), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5223
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional competitiveness: An elusive yet key concept? Regional Studies, 38(9), 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000320816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1987). The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. Journal of Development Economics, 27(1-2), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. (1996). Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl, S., Fahlbusch, M., Ermann, M., Brümmer, B., Schulze-Ehlers, B., (2016). Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2015. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(670-2019-659), 18–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lambaré, P., Dervillé, M., & You, G. (2018). ‪Quelles conditions d’accès au marché des éleveurs après les quotas laitiers Economie Rurale, 2(364), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5525
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, C., Du Tertre, C., Dieuaide, P., & Petit, P. (2008). Régulations sectorielles et territoriales au coeur du nouveau régime d'accumulation. In C. Laurent and C. Du Tertre (Eds.), Secteurs et territoires dans les régulations émergentes. L'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Malassis, L. (1977). Economie agro-alimentaire. Économie Rurale, 122(1), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1977.2525
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(1–2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multilevel perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. L., & Sunley, P. (2011). Regional competitiveness: Clusters or dynamic comparative advantage? In R. Huggins, & H. Izushi (Eds.), Competition, competitive advantage and clusters: The ideas of Michael Porter (pp. 211–238). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, A., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2014). The origins, development, and application of qualitative comparative analysis: The first 25 years. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 115–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., & Kebir, L. (2005). What qualifies as a cluster theory? Vol. 5. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Meuwissen, M. P., Velthuis, A. G., Hogeveen, H., & Huirne, R. (2003). Traceability and certification in meat supply chains. Journal of Agribusiness, 21(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.14666
   Google Scholar
• Mosnier, C., & Wieck, C. (2010). Determinants of spatial dynamics of dairy production: A review. Agricultural and Resource Economics Discussion Paper, 2, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2000). La politique agricole française: L'État et les organisations professionnelles. Économie Rurale, 255(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5153
   Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2016). Une nouvelle qualification paysanne: Exploitant rural. Pour, 232(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.3917/pour.232.0185
   Google Scholar
• Mundler, P., & Rémy, J. (2012). L’exploitation familiale à la française: Une institution dépassée? L’Homme la Societe, 183–184(1), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.3917/lhs.183.0161
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, J. (2015). Report on Prospects for the EU Dairy Sector – Review of the Implementation of the Dairy Package (2014/2146(INI)). Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, A8-0187/2015. European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1971). Institutional change and economic growth. The Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700094109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecqueur, B. (2001). Qualité et développement territorial: L’hypothèse du panier de biens et de services territorialisés. Économie Rurale, 261(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2001.5217
   Google Scholar
• Perrier-Cornet, P., & Sylvander, B. (2000). Firmes, coordinations et territorialité une lecture économique de la diversité des filières d’appellation d’origine. Économie Rurale, 258(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5195
   Google Scholar
• Perrot, C., Derville, M., Monniot, C., & Richard, M. (2009). Le lait dans les montagnes européennes. Un symbole menacé. Rencontres Autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, 16, 215–218. http://www.journees3r.fr/IMG/pdf/2009_05_03_Perrot.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1989). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. In Asch, D., & Bowman, C. (Eds.), Readings in strategic management. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_17
   Google Scholar
• Pouch, T., & Trouvé, A. (2018). Deregulation and the crisis of dairy markets in Europe: Facts for economic interpretation. Studies in Political Economy, 99(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2018.1492216
   Google Scholar
• Praly, C., Chazoule, C., Delfosse, C., & Mundler, P. (2014). Les circuits de proximité, cadre d’analyse de la relocalisation des circuits alimentaires. Géographie, économie, Société, 16(4), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.16.455-478
   Google Scholar
• Requier-Desjardins, D. (2009). Territoires–Identités–Patrimoine: une approche économique? In Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie (Dossier 12).
   Google Scholar
• Schritt, J., Hülbusch, I. M., & Hülbusch, K. H. (1977). Bauern gegen atomanlagen, oder, wi wüllt den schiet nich hebben!. Plakat-Bauernverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (1988). Flexible production systems and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1988.tb00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servolin, C. (1989). L’agriculture moderne. du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, R. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnino, R., Kanemasu, Y., & Marsden, T. (2008). Sustainability and rural development. In J. D. van der Ploeg, & T. K. Marsden (Eds.), Unfolding webs: The dynamics of regional rural development (pp. 29–52). Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvander, B., Lagrange, L., & Monticelli, C. (2007). Les signes officiels de qualité et d’origine européens. Quelle insertion dans une économie globalisée. Économie Rurale. Agricultures, Alimentations, Territoires, 299(299), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.184
   Google Scholar
• Théret, B. (2005). Économie, Éthique et droit. La contribution de l’économie institutionnelle de john R. Commons à la compréhension de leurs (Cor) relations. In P. Batifoulier, & M. Gadreau (Eds.), Éthique médicale et politique de santé (pp. 63–91). Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2002). Les AOC sont-elles des clubs? Réflexions sur les conditions de l’action collective localisée, entre coopération et règles formelles. Revue D'économie Industrielle, 100(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.2002.984
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42(6), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzard, J.-M. (1995). Régulation sectorielle, dynamique régionale et transformation d'un système productif localisé: Exemple de la viticulture languedocienne. La grande transformation de l'agriculture, 293–322.
   Google Scholar
• Trouvé, A., & Berriet-Solliec, M. (2010). Regionalization in European agricultural policy: Institutional actualities, issues and prospects. Regional Studies, 44(8), 1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012). Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.646164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valceschini, E., & Mazé, A. (2000). La politique de la qualité agro-alimentaire dans le contexte international. Economie Rurale, 258(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5191
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D., Laurent, C., Blondeau, F., & Bonnafous, P. (2009). Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, S124–S131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. & Bromley, D. W. (1994). Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(2), 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltz, P. (1993). D’une géographie des coûts à une géographie de l’organisation quelques thèses sur l’évolution des rapports entreprises/territoires. Revue Économique, 44(4), 671–684. https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1993_num_44_4_409472
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, J. (2018). Opportunities and weaknesses of cluster policy. In Economics of clusters (pp. 85–103). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). How to do better case studies. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2, 254–282. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n8
   Google Scholar