Regional opportunity spaces – observations from Nordic regions

REFERENCES

• Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Young, S. L. (2010). Debates in entrepreneurship: Opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.) Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 23–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (1994). Tolkning og reflektion. Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2000). What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography. Antipode, 32(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. (2012). The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination. Regional Studies, 46(8), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (1997). New industries and windows of locational opportunity: A long-term analysis of Belgium. Erdkunde, 51(1), 12–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25646864. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness, related variety and economic geography. In P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwatz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931504.00028
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Van der Knaap, G. A. (1999). New high-tech industries and windows of locational opportunity: The role of labour markets and knowledge institutions during the industrial era. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 81(2), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.1999.00050.x
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848445987
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., & Gertler, M. S. (2000). The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Eriksson, A. (2012). Resilience, innovative ‘white spaces’ and cluster-platforms as a response to globalisation shocks. In P. Cooke, M. D. Parrilli, & J. L. Curbelo (Eds.), Innovation, global change and territorial resilience (pp. 43–70). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857935755.00009
   Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1961/2005). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2014). Systematic combining – A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). The ‘policy mix’ for innovation: Rethinking innovation policy in a multi-level, multi-actor context. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2019). Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: Towards a theoretical framework. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1494824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Martynovich, M., Fitjar, R. D., & Haus-Reve, S. (2021). The black box of regional growth. Journal of Geographical Systems, 23(3), 425–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-020-00341-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønlund, I. L. (1994). Restructuring one-company towns: The Norwegian context and the case of Mo i Rana. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649400100205
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Klerding, C., & Marques, P. (2014). Advancing evolutionary economic geography by engaged pluralism. Regional Studies, 48(7), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.889815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik, T., Håkansson, M., & Isaksson, K. (2011). The Swedish discourse on sustainable regional development: Consolidating the post-political condition. International Planning Studies, 16(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.561062
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S.-E., & Høvig, Ø. S. (2014). Hegemonic ideas and local adaptations: Development of the Norwegian regional restructuring instrument. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.894562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(7), 1213–1235. https://doi.org/10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. W. (2010). Seizing the white space: Business model innovation for growth and renewal. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karijord, C. (2016). Skal ruste opp nordnorske bedrifter. High North News. https://www.highnorthnews.com/nb/skal-ruste-opp-nordnorske-bedrifter
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, N. F. Jr., & Day, M. (2010). Looking forward, looking backward: From entrepreneurial cognition to neuroentrepreneurship. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.) Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 321–357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_13
   Google Scholar
• Kurikka, H., Kolehmainen, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Agency and perceived regional opportunity spaces. Conference paper. GeoInno 2020, Stavanger. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339653006_Agency_and_perceived_regional_opportunity_spaces
   Google Scholar
• Laasonen, V., & Kolehmainen, J. (2017). Capabilities in knowledge-based regional development – Towards a dynamic framework. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1337727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (2007). The accident of the region: A strategic relational perspective on the construction of the region’s significance. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1193–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701675579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1997). Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies, 5(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319708720382
   Google Scholar
• March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. (2022). Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies, 56, 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/4.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Lauvås, T. A. (2018). The role of proximity dimensions in facilitating university–industry collaboration in peripheral regions: Insights from a comparative case study in northern Norway. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 9, 312–331. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v9.1378
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(10), 2296–2301. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Birch, K., Cumbers, A., MacKinnon, D., & McMaster, R. (2009). A geographical political economy of evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography, 85(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (1999). Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: Economic performance in Europe. Growth and Change, 30(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/0017-4815.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (1987). High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction. International Social Science Journal, 112, 215–232.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2015). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753256
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2017). An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16664906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 3–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Walker, R. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez, F. F., Grodal, S., & Gotsopoulos, A. (2015). Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition (pp. 297–317). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097489
   Google Scholar