Regional recombinant novelty, related and unrelated technologies: a patent-level approach

REFERENCES

• Arts, S., & Fleming, L. (2018). Paradise of novelty – Or loss of human capital? Exploring new fields and inventive output. Organization Science, 29(6), 1074–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, S., & Veugelers, R. (2015). Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), 1215–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53, 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G., & Balland, P.-A. (2014). Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy, 43(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), 1591–1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation, 55–56, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Balland, P., Rigby, D., Boschma, R., et al. (2017). Regional diversification opportunities and Smart Specialization Strategies. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/133737
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2007). Breakthroughs and the ‘long tail’ of innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimeriks, G., & Boschma, R. (2014). The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986–2008. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, M., Stam, E., & Wenting, R. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies, 47(8), 1348–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.750422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, K., & Fornahl, D. (2020). Essential ingredients for radical innovations? The role of (un-)related variety and external linkages in Germany. Papers in Regional Science. 99(5), 1165–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A. (2021). Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(2), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Delgado, M., Feldman, M., Frenken, K., Glaeser, E., He, C., Kogler, D.F., Morrison, A., Neffke, F., Rigby, D., Stern, S., Zheng, S., & Zhu, S. (2018). The principle of relatedness (pp. 451–457). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_46
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126science.1144581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. J., & Frenken, K. (2019). Cross-specialisation policy: Rationales and options for linking unrelated industries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keijl, S., Gilsing, V. A., Knoben, J., & Duysters, G. (2016). The two faces of inventions: The relationship between recombination and impact in pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 45(5), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science, 53(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., Essletzbichler, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2017). The evolution of specialization in the EU15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17, 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., Heimeriks, G., & Alkemade, F. (2021). Recombinant invention in solar photovoltaic technology: Can geographical proximity bridge technological distance? Regional Studies, 55(4), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1839639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., Orsatti, G., & Quatraro, F. (2020). Technological novelty and key enabling technologies: Evidence from European regions (Discussion Paper No. 2020-05).
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemet, G. F., & Johnson, E. (2012). Do important inventions benefit from knowledge originating in other technological domains? Research Policy, 41(1), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, F. L., Alshamsi, A., Hartmann, D., Boschma, R., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2018). Shooting high or low: Do countries benefit from entering unrelated activities? https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.05352
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. L., & Essletzbichler, J. (2008). Evolution, process variety, and regional trajectories of technological change in U.S. manufacturing. Economic Geography, 73(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.1997.tb00089.x
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons (Final Report). World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, W., & Duysters, G. (2010). The technological origins of radical inventions. Research Policy, 39(8), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Criscuolo, C. (2013). Measuring patent quality (No. 2013/03). OECD Publ. http://doi.org/10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en
   Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window On the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599700000006
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar