292
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General papers

Waste recycling and yardstick competition among Italian provinces after the EU Waste Framework Directive

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1535-1545 | Received 03 Sep 2021, Published online: 03 Jan 2023

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O'Shea, L. (2011). Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2214–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.028
  • Agovino, M., Crociata, A., & Sacco, P. L. (2016). Location matters for pro-environmental behavior: A spatial Markov Chains approach to proximity effects in differentiated waste collection. The Annals of Regional Science, 56(1), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0740-7
  • Agovino, M., D'Uva, M., Garofalo, A., & Marchesano, K. (2018). Waste management performance in Italian provinces: Efficiency and spatial effects of local governments and citizen action. Ecological Indicators, 89, 680–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.045
  • Allers, M. A., & Elhorst, J. P. (2005). Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1500-x
  • Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2–3), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.003
  • Benito, B., Guillamón, M. D., & Ríos, A. M. (2017). The electoral budget cycle on municipal waste collection expenditure. Applied Economics, 49(41), 4161–4179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1276278
  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 769–798. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946699
  • Bivand, R., & Szymanski, S. (2000). Modelling the spatial impact of the introduction of Compulsory Competitive Tendering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00038-1
  • Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2003). In search of yardstick competition: A spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00062-7
  • Bracco, E., & Revelli, F. (2018). Concurrent elections and political accountability: Evidence from Italian local elections. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 148, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.006
  • Cantoni, E., Gazzè, L., & Schafer, J. (2021). Turnout in concurrent elections: Evidence from two quasi-experiments in Italy. European Journal of Political Economy, 70, 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102035
  • Case, A. C., Hines, J. R. J., & Rosen, H. S. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90036-S
  • Cerqueira, P. A., & Soukiazis, E. (2022). Socio-economic and political factors affecting the rate of recycling in Portuguese municipalities. Economic Modelling, 108, 105779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105779
  • Costa, H. (2016). Pork barrel as a signaling tool: The case of U.S. environmental policy (GRI Working Papers No. 225). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Costa, H., Veiga, G., & Portela, M. (2015). Interactions in local governments’ spending decisions: Evidence from Portugal. Regional Studies, 49(9), 1441–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.835798
  • Coviello, D., & Gagliarducci, S. (2017). Tenure in office and public procurement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 59–105. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150426
  • Crociata, A., Agovino, M., & Sacco, P. L. (2016). Neighborhood effects and pro-environmental behavior: The case of Italian separate waste collection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.083
  • D’Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2015). Waste and organized crime in regional environments How waste tariffs and the mafia affect waste management and disposal. Resource and Energy Economics, 41, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.003
  • Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1210–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005
  • Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. (2009). Environmental activism and dynamics of unit-based pricing systems. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.10.003
  • Edmark, K., & Ågren, H. (2008). Identifying strategic interactions in Swedish local income tax policies. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(3), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.06.001
  • Esteller-Moré, A., & Rizzo, L. (2014). US excise tax horizontal interdependence: Yardstick versus tax competition. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(3), 711–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0607-3
  • European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive).
  • European Commission. (2018). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of EU waste legislation.
  • European Commission. (2020). Communication: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/
  • Eurostat. (2022). Waste statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics#Total_waste_generation
  • Ferraresi, M. (2020). Political cycles, spatial interactions, and yardstick competition: Evidence from Italian cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(4), 1093–1115. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz036
  • Ferraresi, M. (2021). Political budget cycle, tax collection mimicking and yardstick competition. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 21(3), 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2020-0380
  • Ferraresi, M. (2022). Immigrants, social transfers for education, and spatial interactions. The Journal of Urban Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2021.103423
  • Ferraresi, M., Migali, G., & Rizzo, L. (2018). Spillover effects in local public spending. Regional Studies, 52(11), 1570–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1415429
  • Figlio, D. K., Kolpin, V. W., & Reid, W. E. (1999). Do states play welfare games? Journal of Urban Economics, 46(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2131
  • Foucault, M., Madies, T., & Paty, S. (2008). Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice, 137(1–2), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9312-z
  • Gaeta, G. L., Ghinoi, S., & Silvestri, F. (2017). Municipal performance in waste recycling: An empirical analysis based on data from the Lombardy region (Italy). Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 10(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-017-0188-8
  • Gibbons, S., & Overman, H. G. (2012). Mostly pointless spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2012.00760.x
  • Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  • Hage, O., Sandberg, K., Söderholm, P. et al. (2018). The regional heterogeneity of household recycling: A spatial-econometric analysis of Swedish plastic packing waste. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 11, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-017-0200-3
  • Johnstone, N., & Labonne, J. (2004). Generation of household solid waste in OECD countries: An empirical analysis using macroeconomic data. Land Economics, 80(4), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/3655808
  • Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontieres: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review, 877–892.
  • Kinnaman, T., & Fullerton, D. (1999), The economics of residential solid waste management (Working Paper No. 7326). National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
  • Kinnaman, T., & Fullerton, D. (2000). Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2174
  • Mateu-Sbert, J., Ricci-Cabello, I., Villalonga-Olives, E., & Cabeza-Irigoyen, E. (2013). The impact of tourism on municipal solid waste generation: The case of Menorca Island (Spain). Waste Management, 33(12), 2589–2593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.007
  • Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2011). Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings. Applied Economics, 43(24), 3299–3311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840903559612
  • Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2012). Waste dynamics in economic and policy transitions: Decoupling, convergence and spatial effects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(5), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.616582
  • Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Municipal waste generation and socio-economic drivers: Evidence from comparing northern and southern Italy. The Journal of Environment & Development, 17(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496507312575
  • Padovano, F., & Petrarca, I. (2014). Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent? European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.006
  • Revelli, F. (2002). Testing the tax mimicking versus expenditure spill-over hypotheses using English data. Applied Economics, 34(14), 1723–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210122353
  • Revelli, F. (2003). Reaction or interaction? Spatial process identification in multi-tiered government structures. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00512-0
  • Rizzo, L. (2008). Local government responsiveness to federal transfers: Theory and evidence. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(3), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9025-0
  • Rizzo, L. (2010). Interaction between federal taxation and horizontal tax competition: Theory and evidence from Canada. Public Choice, 144(1–2), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9524-x
  • Romano, G., Rapposelli, A., & Marrucci, L. (2019). Improving waste production and recycling through zero-waste strategy and privatization: An empirical investigation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.030
  • Salmon, P. (1987). Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24
  • Sidique, S. F., Joshi, S. V., & Lupi, F. (2010). Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(4), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.006
  • Solé Ollé, A. (2003). Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: The effects of electoral margins, coalition government, and ideology. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 685–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00023-5
  • Terry, N. (2011). The determinants of municipal recycling: A time series approach. Southwestern Economic Review, 29, 53–62.
  • Valenzuela-Levi, N. (2019). Do the rich recycle more? Understanding the link between income inequality and separate waste collection within metropolitan areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.195

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.