Intermediation in European aerospace clusters: a configurational approach

REFERENCES

• Agogué, M., Berthet, E., Fredberg, T., Le Masson, P., Segrestin, B., Stoetzel, M., Wiener, M., & Yström, A. (2017). Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the ‘unknown’: A contingency approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2015-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATLAS.ti. (2020). ATLAS.ti (8.0). ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development.
   Google Scholar
• Aviation Forum in Hamburg. (2020). RECORD! 145 companies present their innovations in the exhibition. https://www.aviationforumhamburg.com/exhibitors-2019
   Google Scholar
• Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., & Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2012). Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X11433998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, F., & Tsai, W. (2011). Overcoming relational inertia: How organizational members respond to acquisition events in a Law firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 408–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211432540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Hassink, R. (2021). Rethinking the role of local knowledge networks in territorial innovation models. Industry and Innovation, 28(7), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1941802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Mapping the regional divide in Europe: A measure for assessing quality of government in 206 European regions. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, I., & Ramirez, M. (2014). Intermediaries and capability building in ‘emerging’ clusters. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1262r
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comunian, R., & England, L. (2018). The resilience of knowledge from industrial to creative clusters: The case of regional craft clusters in the West Midlands (UK). In T. Baycan, & H. Pinto (Eds.), Resilience, crisis and innovation dynamics (pp. 326–346). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Markovic, J., & Meneguzzo, M. (2014). Governance, management and performance in public networks: How to be successful in shared-governance networks. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9237-2
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Meneguzzo, M., & Riccucci, N. (2017). Collaborative administration: The management of successful networks. Public Management Review, 19(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1209236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, S. C. S., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2010). The evolution of the cluster literature: Shedding light on the regional studies–regional science debate. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1263–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903234670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dei Ottati, G. (1994). Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(6), 529–546. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbekink, M., & Lagendijk, A. (2013). What’s next in researching cluster policy: Place-based governance for effective cluster policy. European Planning Studies, 21(5), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.734460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECORYS. (2009). Competitiveness of the EU aerospace industry with focus on: Aeronautics industry – Summary. ECORYS.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
   Google Scholar
• European Aerospace Cluster Partnership (EACP). (2015). Stronger together: Connecting aerospace clusters. Hamburg Aviation.
   Google Scholar
• European Aerospace Cluster Partnership (EACP). (2016). Members of the European Aerospace Cluster Partnership. http://www.eacp-aero.eu/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic&file=uploads%2Fpics%2FEACP_members_chart_4-2015_updated.pdf&width=800&height=600m&bodyTag=%3Cbodystyle%3D%22margin%3A0%3Bbackground%3A%23fff%3B%22%3E&wrap=%3Cahref%3D%22javascript%3Aclose%28%29%3B%22
   Google Scholar
• European Aerospace Cluster Partnership (EACP). (2019). Stronger together: Connecting aerospace clusters. Hamburg Aviation.
   Google Scholar
• European Cluster Collaboration Platform. (2019). List of cluster organisations. https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/cluster-list
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019a). Community Innovation Survey (CIS). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/community-innovation-survey
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2019b). Population change – Demographic balance and crude rates at regional level (NUTS 3) (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/demo_r_gind3_esms.htm
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers And agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1–2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599900000002
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Huber, F. (2015). Global pipelines for innovation: Insights from the case of Norway. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(6), 1248–1267. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. (2000). A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909–1997). Research Policy, 29(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00064-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Cefis, E., & Stam, E. (2015). Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Regional Studies, 49(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.904505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2005). How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches. Research Policy, 34(8), 1250–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., & Pagliarin, S. (2021). Social and causal complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): strategies to account for emergence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1799636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giest, S. (2015). Network capacity-building in high-tech sectors: Opening the black box of cluster facilitation policy. Public Administration, 93(2), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2013a). Clusters, networks and firms’ product success: An empirical study. Management Decision, 51(6), 1135–1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2012-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. (2013b). Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile. Research Policy, 42(8), 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., Balland, P. A., & Matta, A. (2019). Straining but not thriving: Understanding network dynamics in underperforming industrial clusters. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golman, R., & Klepper, S. (2016). Spinoffs and clustering. The RAND Journal of Economics, 47(2), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. R., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37(3), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, H., & Broekel, T. (2020). A shot in the dark? Policy influence on cluster networks. Research Policy, 49(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., & Fiss, P. C. (2013). The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. In P. C. Fiss, B. Cambré, & A. Marx (Eds.), Configurational theory and methods in organizational research (Vol. 38, Issue 2013, pp. 49–75). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038007
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2017). Firm performance in the periphery: On the relation between firm-internal knowledge and local knowledge spillovers. Regional Studies, 51(8), 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1175554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., & Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38(3), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Chea, R., Mahdad, M., Minh, T. T., & Hjortsø, C. N. (2021). Moving beyond intermediation: How intermediary organizations shape collaboration dynamics in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Technovation, 108(June), 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102332
   Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2008). The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas Alvarado, R., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, 52(3), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickie, D. (2006). Knowledge and competitiveness in the aerospace industry: The cases of Toulouse, Seattle and north-west England. European Planning Studies, 14(5), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500500254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., Johnston, A., & Thompson, P. (2012). Network capital, social capital and knowledge flow: How the nature of inter-organizational networks impacts on innovation. Industry & Innovation, 19(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.669615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2014). A network-based view of regional growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3), 511–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingstrup, M. B. (2013). Facilitating different types of clusters. Management Revue, 24(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1688/1861-9908
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, K. N., & Park, H. (2012). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., Provan, K. G., & Kruyen, P. M. (2009). Network-level task and the design of whole networks: Is there a relationship? In U. J. Bøllingtoft A., Håkonsson D., Nielsen J., & C. Snow (Eds.), New approaches to organization design (pp. 23–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0627-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. R., Lincoln, W. F., & Mishra, P. (2014). The dynamics of firm lobbying. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4), 343–379. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., Bienkowska, D., Laur, I., & Sölvell, I. (2015). Success factors in cluster initiative management: Mapping out the ‘big five.’. Industry and Higher Education, 29(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2012). Configurations of inter-organizational knowledge links: Does spatial embeddedness still matter? Regional Studies, 46(8), 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laur, I., Klofsten, M., & Bienkowska, D. (2012). Catching regional development dreams: A study of cluster initiatives as intermediaries. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1909–1921. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.725161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, É, & Lefebvre, L. A. (1998). Global strategic benchmarking, critical capabilities and performance of aerospace subcontractors. Technovation, 18(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00013-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A. (2017). Resource allocation and firm boundaries. Journal of Management, 43(8), 2580–2587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316667458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, G., Ketels, C., & Sölvell, Ö. (2013). The cluster initiative Greenbook 2.0. Ivory Tower.
   Google Scholar
• Maghssudipour, A., Balland, P. A., & Giuliani, E. (2021). Cast apart by the elites: How status influences assortative matching in industrial clusters. Industry and Innovation, 28(7), 836–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1860738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Macmillan & Co. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
   Google Scholar
• McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 532–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2011). Performance differentials within geographic clusters. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles-dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterlechner, M. (2019). Theoretical foundations of leadership in networks. In M. Mitterlechner (Eds.), Leading in inter-organizational networks: Towards a reflexive practice (pp. 27–41). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97979-3
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. X., Martínez-Cháfer, L., & Valiente-Bordanova, D. (2019). Different paths to achieve high technological innovation in clustered firms: An analysis of the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Applied Sciences, 9(18), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183710
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R., & Zirulia, L. (2013). When do global pipelines enhance the diffusion of knowledge in clusters? Economic Geography, 89(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, E. F., & Jungwirth, C. (2016). What drives the effectiveness of industrial clusters? Exploring the impact of contextual, structural and functioning determinants. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(5–6), 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1186748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, W., & Ebbekink, M. (2018). In search of the sweet spot: The role of personal proximity in three Dutch clusters. Journal of Business Research, 92(July), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.010
   Google Scholar
• Pagliarin, S., & Gerrits, L. (2020). Trajectory-based qualitative comparative analysis: Accounting for case-based time dynamics. Methodological Innovations, 13(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120959170
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2014). The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change, 29, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., Drass, K. A., & Davey, S. (2017). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 3.0 (3.0). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. L., & Brown, W. M. (2015). Who benefits from agglomeration? Regional Studies, 49(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.753141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2006). Better rules or stronger communities? On the social foundations of institutional change and its economic effects. Economic Geography, 82(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka-Helmhout, A., Chappin, M., & Vermeulen, P. (2020). Multiple paths to firm innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa: How informal institutions matter. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1551–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619882971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaria, R., Paolone, F., Cucari, N., & Dezi, L. (2021). Non-financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1993–2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H., & Nadvi, K. (1999). Clustering and industrialization: Introduction. World Development, 27(9), 1503–1514. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00072-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Vis, B., & Koivu, K. (2019). Set-analytic approaches, especially qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). In QTD Working Group III.4. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333483
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schüßler, E., Decker, C., & Lerch, F. (2013). Networks of clusters: A governance perspective. Industry & Innovation, 20(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.805929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 10(2), 424–462. https://doi.org/10.1086/316962
   Google Scholar
• Speldekamp, D., Knoben, J., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2020). Clusters and firm-level innovation: A configurational analysis of agglomeration, network and institutional advantages in European aerospace. Research Policy, 49(3), 103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speldekamp, D., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Knoben, J. (2020). Reconciling perspectives on clusters: An integrative review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., Lerch, F., Huxham, C., & Hibbert, P. (2011). A silent cry for leadership: Organizing for leading (in) clusters. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. (2009). Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., & Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802662658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trang, S., Zander, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2015). The contingent role of centrality in IT network governance: An empirical examination. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.07102
   Google Scholar
• Vernay, A. L., D’Ippolito, B., & Pinkse, J. (2018). Can the government create a vibrant cluster? Understanding the impact of cluster policy on the development of a cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(7–8), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1501611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., & Vis, B. (2021). Three strategies to track configurations over time with qualitative comparative analysis. European Political Science Review, 13(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yström, A., & Aspenberg, H. (2017). Open for innovation? Practices supporting collaboration in Swedish regional clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617400084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar