References
- Bahr, C. (2008). How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds? Kyklos, 61(1), 3–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00389.x
- Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations (Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hubner, Commissioner for Regional Policy).
- Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
- Crescenzi, R., Di Cataldo, M., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). Government quality and the economic returns of transport infrastructure investment in European regions. Journal of Regional Science, 56(4), 555–582. doi:10.1111/jors.12264
- Faiña, A., Lopez-Rodriguez, J., & Montes-Solla, P. (2020). European Union regional policy and development in Spain: Capital widening and productivity stagnation over 1989–2010. Regional Studies, 54(1), 106–119. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1542127
- Polverari, L. (2015). Does devolution increase accountability? Empirical evidence from the implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(6), 1074–1086. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.1001351
- Polverari, L. (2016). Cohesion policy in the southern periphery. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on cohesion policy in the EU (pp. 231–249). Edward Elgar.
- Tondl, G. (1998). EU regional policy in the southern periphery: Lessons for the future. South European Society and Politics, 3(1), 93–129. doi:10.1080/13608740308539527
- Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of regional funds: A comparative analysis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387. doi:10.1111/jcms.12088