Absorptive capacity, complexity and regional renewal: a developmental psychology perspective

REFERENCES

• Bækkelund, N. G. (2021). Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies, 55(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, D. E., & Cowan, C. C. (2006). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership and change. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Harris-Lovett, S., Kiparsky, M., Sedlak, D. L., & Truffer, B. (2016). The thorny road to technology legitimation – institutional work for potable water reuse in California. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazek, J., & Kveton, V. (2022). Towards an integrated framework of agency in regional development: The case of old industrial regions. Regional Studies, DOI:10.1080/00343404.2022.2054976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Greuter, S. (2004). Making a case for a developmental perspective. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36(7), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850410563902
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Greuter, S. (2013). Nine levels of increasing embrace in ego development: A full-spectrum theory of vertical growth and meaning making. Zugriff am, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 756–785. https://doi.org/10.2307/258744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., Vorley, T., Vallance, P., & Brooks, C. (2022). The role of system-building agency in regional path creation: Insights from the emergence of artificial intelligence in Montreal. Regional Studies, 56(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1886273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, J., Copeland, S., & Murie, A. (2009). Toward a ‘new’ strategic leadership of place for the knowledge-based economy. Leadership, 5(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, C. (2005). The never ending quest: Dr. Clare W. Graves explores human nature: A treatise on an emergent cyclica. ECLET.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, C. W. (1970). Levels of existence: An open system theory of values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 10(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787001000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26(8), 1638–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannant, A., McNeill, J., Burkett, I., & Price, A. (2021). Directions part 1: Perspectives, provocations and sense-making for strategy. Social enterprise national strategy (SENS) project. The Yunus Centre, Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R. A., Kania, J. V., & Kramer, M. R. (2004). Leading boldly. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2(3), 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2019). The behavioural foundations of urban and regional development: Culture, psychology and agency. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2021). A behavioural theory of economic development: The uneven evolution of cities and regions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2022). Human agency, network dynamics and regional development: The behavioral principles of new path creation. Regional Studies, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2060958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2014a). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. HRD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2014b). Reflections – A perspective on paradox and its application to modern management. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314524909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H. E., Chesley, J. A., & Egan, T. (2020). Helping leaders grow up: Vertical leadership development in practice. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.131.1275
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R. (1998). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2016). An everyone culture: Becoming a deliberately developmental organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, I. F., Pugh, R., & Grillitsch, M. (2022). Leadership and governance challenges in delivering place-based transformation through smart specialisation. Regional Studies, 57(1), 196–208. 10.1080/00343404.2022.2090536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukk, P., Moors, E. H. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2015). The complexities in system building strategies – The case of personalized cancer medicines in England. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasonen, V., Kolehmainen, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). The complexity of contemporary innovation policy and its governance in Finland. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(4), 547–568. 10.1080/13511610.2020.1842176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/259204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(3), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, J., Durkin, K., & Nesdale, A. (2004). Promoting advanced ego development among adults. Journal of Adult Development, 11(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000012524.32002.8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2007). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. D., Drath, W. H., Palus, C. J., O’Connor, P. M. G., & Baker, B. A. (2006). The use of constructive-developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 634–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiolik, J., Markard, J., Hekkert, M., & Furrer, B. (2018). Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes, G., & Tomay, K. (2022). Split realities – dilemmas for rural/gastro tourism in territorial development. Regional Studies, 1–10. 10.1080/00343404.2022.2084059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey, L. R., & Coenen, L. (2022). Lock-in, paradox and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 56(8), 1333–1346. 10.1080/00343404.2021.1976745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Shaw-Taylor, L., Satchell, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Gosling, S. (2018). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palus, C. J., McGuire, J. B., Stawiski, S., & Torbert, W. R. (2020). The art and science of vertical development. In Fikse, C., Fitch, G., Harney, A., Lynam, A., & Marchetti, J. J. (Eds.), Maturing leadership: How adult development impacts leadership (ch. 3). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, N. (2014). Vertical leadership development – Part 1: Developing leaders. Center for Creative Leadership. http://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/VerticalLeadersPart1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, N. (2015). The how-to of vertical leadership development – Part 2: 30 Experts, 3 conditions and 15 approaches. Center for Creative Leadership. http://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/verticalLeadersPart2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in a child. Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Rooke, D., & Torbert, W. R. (2005). Seven transformations of leadership – Leaders are made, not born, and how they develop is critical for organizational change. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 66–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1490–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., & Suvinen, N. (2019). Place leadership and the challenge of transformation: Policy platforms and innovation ecosystems in promotion of green growth. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1748–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1634006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbert, B. (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, N., Ward, L., & Denison, L. (2015). Promoting post-conventional consciousness in leaders: Australian community leadership programs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar