Political twists and turns in left-behind places: reactions of an extractive heartland to changing state strategies

REFERENCES

• Adaman, F., & Akbulut, B. (2019). Erdoğan’s three-pillar neoliberalism: Authoritarianism, populism, and developmentalism. Geoforum, 124(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.12.013.
   Google Scholar
• Akçay, Ü. (2018). Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis (Working Paper No. 100/2018). Institute for International Political Economy. https://www.ipe-berlin.org/fileadmin/institut-ipe/Dokumente/Working_Papers/IPE_WP_100.pdf, 16.08.2022
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of power: Beyond territory and networks. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 43(1), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasoy, Y. (2017). Repossession, re-informalization and dispossession: The ‘muddy terrain’ of land commodification in Turkey. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(4), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAKKA. (2013). 2014–2023 Batı Karadeniz Bolge Planı Mevcut Durum Analizi. http://bakkakutuphane.org/upload/dokumandosya/2014-2023-bati-karadeniz-bolge-plani-cilt1-mevcut_durum_analizi_1_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bayırbağ, M. K. (2010). Local entrepreneurialism and state rescaling in Turkey. Urban Studies, 47(2), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009349022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayırbağ, M. K. (2013). Continuity and change in public policy: Redistribution, exclusion and state rescaling in Turkey. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1123–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernt, M. (2019). The emergence of ‘stadtumbau ost’. Urban Geography, 40(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1332926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratav, K. (1988). Türkiye İktisat Tarihi. Gerçek.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley-Davenport, H., MacLeavy, J., & Manley, D. (2019). Brexit in Sunderland: The production of difference and division in the UK referendum on European union membership. EPC: Politics and Space, 37(5), 795–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (ÇŞB). (2017a). Zonguldak İli 1/100 000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı, Plan Açıklama Raporu.
   Google Scholar
• Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (ÇŞB). (2017b). Zonguldak İli 1/25 000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı, Plan Açıklama Raporu.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S. S. (2013). New local state power through administrative restructuring: A case study of post-Mao China county-level urban entrepreneurialism in Kunshan. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 46, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2017). ‘People in this country have had enough of experts’: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1282376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closs Stephens, A. (2016). National atmospheres and the Brexit revolt. Society and Space. http://societyandspace.org/2016/08/23/national-atmospheres-and-the-brexit-revolt-angharad-clossstephens/
   Google Scholar
• Coles, T., & Church, A. (2007). Tourism, politics and the forgotten entanglements of power. In A. Church, & T. Coles (Eds.), Tourism, power and space, contemporary geographies of leisure, tourism and mobility series (pp. 1–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., & Ford, R. (2017). Brussels bureaucrats and Whitehall Mandarins: Taking regional identity seriously. In T. Beck, & G. Underhill (Eds.), Quo Vadis?: Identity, policy and the future of the European union (pp. 65–72). Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2014a). Coercive cities: Reflections on the dark side of urban power in the 21st century. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(2), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2014b). Rethinking urban power and the local state: Hegemony, domination and resistance in neoliberal cities. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3215–3232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., Bua, A., Cortina-Oriol, M., & Thompson, E. (2020). Why is austerity governable? A Gramscian urban regime analysis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1490152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruyter, A., Hearne, D., Murshed, S. M., Whittam, G., & Aguma, D. (2021). Beyond remain vs. Leave: Understand changing voter perceptions and attitudes towards populism – Evidence from Scotland and the West Midlands. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54(6), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer, B., & Özarslan, M. (2003). İllerin ve Bölgelerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Sıralaması Araştırması, DPT Bölgesel Gelişme ve Yapısal Uyum Genel Müdürlüğü.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçer, B., & Özarslan, M. (2004). İlçelerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Sıralaması Araştırması, DPT Bölgesel Gelişme ve Yapısal Uyum Genel Müdürlüğü.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. (2016). Brexit: The decision of a divided country. BMJ, 354, i3697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. J., & Pritchard, J. (2010). The geography of poverty, inequality and wealth in the UK and abroad: Because enough is never enough. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 3(2–3), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-009-9042-8
   Google Scholar
• Eraydin, A., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2014). State response to contemporary urban movements in Turkey: A critical overview of state entrepreneurialism and authoritarian interventions. Antipode, 46(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erensü, S. (2017). Turkey’s hydropower renaissance: Nature, neoliberalism and development in the cracks of infrastructure. In F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, & M. Arsel (Eds.), Neoliberal Turkey and Its discontents (pp. 120–146). I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Re-stating the post-political: Depoliticisation, social inequalities and city-region growth. Environment and Planning A, 50(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17738536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., Jones, M., & Telford, L. (2022). Challenges to levelling-up: Post-COVID precarity in ‘left behind’ Stoke-on-Trent. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 1033525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.1033525
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. (2002). The Merseyside objective one programme: Exemplar of coherent city-regional planning and governance or cautionary tale? European Planning Studies, 10(4), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310220130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearn, G., & Davoudi, S. (2021). From post-political to authoritarian planning in England, a crisis of legitimacy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 4, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, J. (2019). The changing electoral geography of England and Wales: Varieties of ‘left-behindness’. Political Geography, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genç, F. (2022). Governing the contested city: Geographies of displacement in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Antipode, 53(6), 1682–1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. J. (2017). Brexit: causes and consequences. Royal Geographical Society, Monday Night Lectures, 16 October. http://www.matthewjgoodwin.org/uploads/6/4/0/2/64026337/leave_vote_lecture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin-Hawkins, B., & Jones, R. D. (2019). 1997 and 2016: Referenda, Brexit, and (re-)bordering at the European periphery. New Global Studies, 13(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2019-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. (2018). In what sense left behind by globalisation? Looking for a less reductionist geography of the populist surge in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, C. (1987). Uneven development and regionalism: State, territory and class in Southern Europe. Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2011). Crises, geographic disruptions and the uneven development of political responses. Economic Geography, 87(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., & Gannon, M. (2017). Austerity urbanism in England: The ‘regressive redistribution’ of local government services and the impact on the poor and marginalized. Environment and Planning A, 49(9), 2007–2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17714797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, C., Muro, M., & Galston, W. A. (2018). Countering the geography of discontent: Strategies for left-behind places. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2018.11_Report_Countering-geography-of-discontent_Hendrickson-Muro-Galston.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. (2007). Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Regional Studies, 14(9), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701291617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (Working Paper Series RWP16-026, August). Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ivaldi, G., & ve Gombin, J. (2015). The Front National and the new politics of the rural in France. In D. Strijker, G. Voerman, & I. J. Terluin (Eds.), Rural protest groups and populist political parties (pp. 243–263). Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2015.1123173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2018). Neoliberalization, uneven development, and Brexit: Further reflections on the organic crisis of the British state and society. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1728–1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1501469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorising sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R. (1997). Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. EPA: Economy and Space, 29(3), 831–864.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y.-M., & Seo, B. (2018). Dual policy to fight urban shrinkage: Daegu, South Korea. Cities, 73, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E. (2016). It’s NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2016/07/09/not-economy-stupid/
   Google Scholar
• Karaman, O. (2014). Resisting urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Geography, 35(2), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.865444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayasü, S., & Yetişkul, E. (2014). Evolving legal and institutional frameworks of neoliberal urban policies in Turkey. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 31(2), 209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazgan, G. (1985). Ekonomide Dışa Açık Büyüme. Altn Kitaplar.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, M., & Luca, D. (2021). The urban–rural polarisation of political disenchantment: An investigation of social and political attitudes in 30 European countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I. (2017). What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T. (2017). Two crises, two trajectories: The impact of the 2001 and 2008 economic crises on urban governance in Turkey. In F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, & M. Arsel (Eds.), Neoliberal Turkey and its discontents: Economic policy and the environment under Erdoğan (pp. 44–74). I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T. (2018). Politics of urban regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities and limits of municipal regeneration initiatives in a highly centralized country. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1152–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1440125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). ‘Urban transformation’ as state-led property transfer: An analysis of Two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1479–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langella, M., & Manning, A. (2016). Who voted leave? Centrepiece: Magazine of the Centre for Economic Performance, (7) 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A. (2021). Economic geography I: Uneven development, ‘left-behind places’ and ‘levelling up’ in a time of crisis. Progress in Human Geography, https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211011684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Wu, F. (2012). The transformation of regional governance in China: The rescaling of statehood. Progress in Planning, 78(2), 55–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los, B., McCann, P., Springford, J., & Thissen, M. (2017). The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit. Regional Studies, 51(5), 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1287350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D. (2021). National elections, sub-national growth: The politics of Turkey’s provincial economic dynamics under AKP rule. Journal of Economic Geography, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2015). Distributive politics and regional development: Assessing the territorial distribution of Turkey’s public investment. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(11), 1518–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1028536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2019). Building consensus: Shifting strategies in the territorial targeting of Turkey’s public transport investment. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1591–1602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1594750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. (2021). Governing uneven development: The northern powerhouse as a ‘state spatial strategy’. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(5), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1743202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., & Shaw, J. (2010). New state spaces, agency and scale: Devolution and the regionalisation of transport governance in Scotland. Antipode, 42(5), 1226–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeavy, J., & Jones, M. (2021). Brexit as Britain in decline and its crises (Revisited). The Political Quarterly, 92(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2018). Explaining ‘Brexit capital’: Uneven development and the austerity state. Space and Polity, 22(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1535272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, I., & Kearon, T. (2018). Social quality and Brexit in Stoke-on-Trent, England. International Journal of Social Quality, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2018.080102
   Google Scholar
• Marr, A. (2016, July 1). The biggest blunder of them all. The New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2016/07/the-biggest-blunder-of-them-all
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2004). State, strategy, and scale in the competitive city: A neo-Gramscian analysis of the governance of ‘global Sydney’. Environment and Planning A, 36(6), 1019–1043. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2005). Neoliberalist planning? Re-thinking and re-casting Sydney’s metropolitan planning. Geographical Research, 43(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, L. (2019). ‘Left behind’ people, or places? The role of local economies in perceived community representation. Electoral Studies, 60, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, L. (2017a). ‘It’s not ideal’: Reconsidering ‘anger’ and ‘apathy’ in the Brexit vote among an invisible working class. Competition and Change, 21(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417704134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, L. (2017b). The class politics of prejudice: Brexit and the land of no-hope and glory. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S265–S280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, M. (2017). The revolt of the Rust Belt: Place and politics in the age of anger. British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S120–S152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2014). Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3290–3305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, P. (2017). Local economies of Brexit. Local Economy, 32(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217705818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurse, A., & Sykes, O. (2019). It’s more complicated than that!: Unpacking ‘Left Behind Britain’ and some other spatial tropes following the UK’s 2016 EU referendum. Local Economy, 34, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219881356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S. (2010). Regulating regionally uneven development and the politics of reconfiguring Belgian state space. Antipode, 42(5), 1151–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özatağan, G., & Eraydin, A. (2021). Emerging policy responses in shrinking cities: Shifting policy agendas to align with growth machine politics. Environment and Planning A, 53(5), 1096–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20975032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, G. B., & Gündüz, U. (2015). Political connectedness and business performance: Evidence from Turkish industry rankings. Business and Politics, 17(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2013-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B.-G. (2008). Uneven development, inter-scalar tensions, and the politics of decentralization in South Korea. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2010). Zombie neoliberalism and the ambidextrous state. Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480609352784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Postneoliberalism and its malcontents. Antipode, 41(1), 1236–1258.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, J. (2017). Between coercion and consent: The politics of ‘cooperative governance’ at a time of ‘austerity localism’ in London. Urban Geography, 38(9), 1352–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1235932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike A, Béal V, Cauchi-Duval N, Franklin N, Kinossian N, Lang T, Leibert T, MacKinnon D, Rousseau M, Royer R, Servillo L, Tomaney J & Velthuis S (2023). ‘Left behind places’: a geographical etymology. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaşkan, O. (2021). Political dynamics of local government reform in a development context: The case of Turkey. EPC: Politics and Space, 39(1), 204–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensier, M., & Devine, F. (2017). Social mobility and Brexit, economics discussion paper series, EDP-1709. University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2010). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Surridge, P., Wager, A., & Wincott, D. (2021). Comfortable leavers: The expectations and hopes of the overlooked Brexit voters (UK in a Changing Europe Briefing Paper). https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Comfortable-Leavers-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, O. (2020). A many and invisible kingdom? – The lost and found territories of ‘Brexit Britain’ (No. 94/3). L’Union européenne à l’épreuve de ses territoires. https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.16013
   Google Scholar
• Şengül, H. T., & Aytekin, A. (2011). Zonguldak coalfield and the past and future of Turkish coal-mining communities. In J. Kirk, S. Jefferys, & S. Contrepois (Eds.), Changing work and community identities in European regions (pp. 154–183). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Şenses, F. (2012). Turkey’s experience with neoliberal policies since 1980 in retrospect and prospect. New Perspectives on Turkey, 47, 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600001680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansel, C. B. (2019). Reproducing authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey: Urban governance and state restructuring in the shadow of executive centralisation. Globalizations, 16(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telford, L., & Wistow, J. (2020). Brexit and the working class on Teesside: Moving beyond reductionism. Capital and Class, 44(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819873310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., & Pike, A. (2018). Brexit, devolution and economic development in ‘left-behind’ regions. Welsh Economic Review, 26(0), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.18573/wer.231
   Google Scholar
• Tomba, L. (2014). The government next door: Neighbourhood politics in urban China. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TTK. (2018). 2018 Yılı Taşkömürü Sektör Raporu. http://www.taskomuru.gov.tr/file//duyuru/ttk_sektor_raporu_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich-Shad, J. D., & Duncan, C. M. (2018). People and places left behind: Work, culture and politics in the rural United States. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1410702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varró, K. (2010). Re-politicising the analysis of ‘New state spaces’ in Hungary and beyond: Towards an effective engagement with ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode, 42(5), 1253–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, W. (2019). The density divide: Urbanization, polarization and populist backlash (Research Paper, June 26). Niskanen Center. https://www.niskanencenter.org/the-density-divide-urbanization-polarization-and-populist-backlash/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. (2017). Democracy in Britain: Retrospect and prospect. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2016). China’s emergent city-region governance: A new form of state spatial selectivity through state-orchestrated rescaling. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(6), 1134–1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F. (2018). Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 55(7), 1383–1399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017721828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeşilbağ, M. (2020). The state-orchestrated financialization of housing in Turkey. Housing Policy Debate, 30(4), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1670715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeşilbağ, M. (2022). Statecraft on cement: The politics of land-based accumulation in Erdoğan’s Turkey. Urban Studies, 59(13), 2679–2694. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211044044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G. (2023). Rescaling the socialist state: Territorial politics and city-region restructuring in Maoist China. Political Geography, 102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., & He, S. (2021). From dissensus to consensus: State rescaling and modalities of power under the belt and road initiative in Western China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(5), 1519–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1823808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonguldak Valiliği. (2018). Zonguldak’ta Doğa ve Kültür Turizmi. Retrieved 07 May, 2019, from https://www.kivi.com.tr/sehirler/zonguldak/.
   Google Scholar