Resilience to disruptions: the role of regional soft spaces

REFERENCES

• Allmendinger, P. (2016). Neoliberal spatial governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Soft spaces, planning and emerging practices of territorial governance. In A. Phil, H. Graham, K. Jörg, & O. Frank (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 3–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Crescenzi, R., Roller, E., Anguelovski, I., Datta, A., & Harrison, J. (2021). Regions in COVID-19 recovery. Regional Studies, 55(12), 1955–1965. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.2003768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, E., & Juhola, S. (2015). Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1234–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014527483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassett, J., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2013). The politics of resilience from a practitioner’s perspective: An interview with Helen Braithwaite OBE. Politics, 33(4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Academy. (2021). The COVID decade: Understanding the long-term societal impacts of COVID-19. British Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., & Gray, N. (2022). Understanding resilient places: Multi-level governance in times of crisis. Local Economy, 37(1–2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942221100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2013a). The role of local resilience forums: A reference document.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2013b). Emergency response and recovery: Non statutory guidance accompanying the civil contingencies Act 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2022). The UK government resilience framework. HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, B. (2017). European groupings of territorial cooperation: A means to harden spatially dispersed cooperation? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4(1), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1394216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Adger, W., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01759-110208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco, C., Mourato, J., Costa, J. P., & Ferrão, J. (2023). Beyond soft planning: Towards a soft turn in planning theory and practice? Planning Theory, 22(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221087389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelleri, L., Waters, J. J., Olazabal, M., & Minucci, G. (2015). Resilience trade-offs: Addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environment and Urbanization, 27(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814550780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmutina, K., Lizarralde, G., Dainty, A., & Bosher, L. (2016). Unpacking resilience policy discourse. Cities, 58, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., et al. (2020). Complexity, uncertainty and resilience. In S. Davoudi (Ed.), The Routledge companion to environmental planning (pp. 93–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., Therrien, M.-C., Chelleri, L., Henstra, D., Aldrich, D., Mitchell, C., Tsenkova, S., & Rigaud, É. (2018). Urban resilience implementation: A policy challenge and research agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(3), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., & Wood, A. (2006). Security is coming home: Rethinking scale and constructing resilience in the global urban response to terrorist risk. International Relations, 20(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117806069416
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. L. (2016). Resilience to what? Resilience for whom? The Geographical Journal, 182(2), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., Brooks, E., & Mehmood, A. (2013). Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Planning Practice and Research, 28(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., & Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2015). Triangulation. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dzigbede, K. D., Gehl, S. B., & Willoughby, K. (2020). Disaster resiliency of U.S. Local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastenrath, S., & Coenen, L. (2021). Future-proof cities through governance experiments? Insights from the resilient Melbourne strategy (RMS). Regional Studies, 55(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1744551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastiggi, M., Meerow, S., & Miller, T. R. (2021). Governing urban resilience: Organisational structures and coordination strategies in 20 north American city governments. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1262–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020907277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferm, J., Trigo, S. F., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2022). Documenting the ‘soft spaces’ of London planning: Opportunity areas as institutional fix in a growth-oriented city. Regional Studies, 56(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1902976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons, J., & Mitchell, C. L. (2019). Just urban futures? Exploring equity in ‘100 resilient cities’. World Development, 122, 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherhes, C., Hoole, C., & Vorley, T. (2023). The ‘imaginary’ challenge of remaking subnational governance: Regional identity and contested city-region-building in the UK. Regional Studies, 57(1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen, G. S., Mydske, P. K., & Dahle, E. (2013). Multi-level coordination of climate change adaptation: By national hierarchical steering or by regional network governance? Local Environment, 18(8), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.738657
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. M., Chu, E. K., & Ziervogel, G. (2018). Negotiated resilience. Resilience, 6(3), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., Smith, D. P., & Kinton, C. (2017). Relational regions ‘in the making’: Institutionalizing new regional geographies of higher education. Regional Studies, 51(7), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1301663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2007). ‘Soft spaces’ in planning. Town & Country Planning, 76, 306–308.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The New spatial planning. Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2013). Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: Soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. (2022). Levelling up the United Kingdom, presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities by command of Her Majesty, 2 February 2022. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kythreotis, A. P., & Bristow, G. I. (2017). The ‘resilience trap’: Exploring the practical utility of resilience for climate change adaptation in UK city-regions. Regional Studies, 51(10), 1530–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01606-110119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512454775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H., & Heinilä, A. (2022). Soft spaces, soft planning, soft law: Examining the institutionalisation of city-regional planning in Finland. Land Use Policy, 119, 106156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, A. G., Shaw, D., O’Grady, N., & Fattoum, A. (2023). Recovery for development: A multi-dimensional, practice-oriented framework for transformative change post-disaster. The Journal of Development Studies, 59(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2130055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo Zurita, M. L., Cook, B., Harms, L., & March, A. (2015). Towards New disaster governance: Subsidiarity as a critical tool. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012). When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(2), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., & Kenny, M. (2023). Devolving English government. Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, G., & Read, P. (2005). Future UK emergency management: New wine, old skin? Disaster Prevention and Management, 14(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560510605018
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, P., White, I., & Connelly, A. (2015). Insurance as maladaptation: Resilience and the ‘business as usual’ paradox. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(6), 1175–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15602022
   Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F., Knieling, J., Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Conclusion – What difference Do soft spaces make? In A. Phil, H. Graham, K. Jörg, & O. Frank (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 215–235). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Zimmerbauer, K. (2016). Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitidis, V., Coaffee, J., & Bouikidis, A. (2023). Creating ‘resilience imaginaries’ for city-regional planning. Regional Studies, 57(4), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2047916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., & Granqvist, K. (2021). Soft spaces as a traveling planning idea: Uncovering the origin and development of an academic concept on the rise. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, J. G., & Hill, R. (2023). Rethinking local resilience for extreme heat events. Public Health, 218, 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoch-Spana, M. (2020). An epidemic recovery framework to jump-start analysis, planning, and action on a neglected aspect of global health security. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(9), 2516–2520. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutt, R. K. (2006). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., & Maythorne, L. (2013). Managing for local resilience: Towards a strategic approach. Public Policy and Administration, 28(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076711432578
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sou, G., Shaw, D., & Aponte-Gonzalez, F. (2021). A multidimensional framework for disaster recovery: Longitudinal qualitative evidence from Puerto Rican households. World Development, 144, 105489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2015). Evolving regional spaces: Shifting spaces in the southern part of the Randstad. In A. Phil, H. Graham, K. Jörg, & O. Frank (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 95–128). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, I. (2023). The rise, fall and resurrection of soft spaces? The regional governance of transport policy in Wales. Regional Studies, 57(9), 1769–1783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2151997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, T. (2016). Moving away from local-based flood risk policy in Austria. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1195282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). United nations common guidance on helping build resilient societies.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J. (2014). The politics of resilient cities: Whose resilience and whose city? Building Research & Information, 42(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, P., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Kempton, L. (2019). Facilitating spaces for place-based leadership in centralized governance systems: The case of Newcastle City Futures. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1723–1733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1598620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., & Wilkinson, C. (2015). Enacting resilience: A performative account of governing for urban resilience. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1265–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I., & O’Hare, P. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., & Paasi, A. (2020). Hard work with soft spaces (and vice versa): Problematizing the transforming planning spaces. European Planning Studies, 28(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar