Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent

REFERENCES

• Agnello, L., Fazio, G., & Sousa, R. M. (2016). National fiscal consolidations and regional inequality in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béal, V., Cauchi-Duval, N., & Rousseau, M. (Eds.). (2021). Déclin urbain. La France dans une perspective internationale. du Croquant.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, C., & Fothergill, S. (2016). The uneven impact of welfare reform: The financial losses to places and people. Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, M., Day, R., & Leach, M. (2020). England’s overlooked neighbourhoods: Defining, understanding and regenerating ‘left-behind’ communities. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 13(2), 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Cagé, J., & Piketty, T. (2024). A history of political conflict. Elections and social inequalities in France, 1789–2022. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coquard, B. (2019). Ceux qui restent. Faire sa vie dans les campagnes en déclin. La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange, S., van der Brug, W., & Harteveld, E. (2023). Regional resentment in The Netherlands: A rural or peripheral phenomenon? Regional Studies, 57(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2084527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruyter, A., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2021). Geographies of discontent: Sources, manifestations and consequences. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 379–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diemer, A., Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2022). The regional development trap in Europe. Economic Geography, 98(5), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvořák, T., & Zouhar, J. (2023). Peripheralization processes as a contextual source of populist vote choices: Evidence from the Czech Republic and Eastern Germany. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 37(3), 983–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221131590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, R., & Rauhut, D. (2023). Regional development, power and topological reach: To reach out or fold in? Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2231504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2017). Profecy – Processes, features and cycles of inner peripheries in Europe. Final Report. ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, M. T. (2016). Root shock. How tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America, and what we can do about it. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, I. R. (2018). In what sense left behind by globalisation? Looking for a less reductionist geography of the populist surge in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görmar, F., Lang, T., Nagy, E., & Raagmaa, G. (2019). Re-thinking regional and local policies in times of polarisation: An introduction. In T. Lang & F. Görmar (Eds.), Regional and local development in times of polarisation: Re-thinking spatial policies in Europe (pp. 1–24). Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Gudgin, G. (1995). Regional problems and policy in the UK. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11(2), 18–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/11.2.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannemann, M., Henn, S., & Schäfer, S. (2023). Regions, emotions and left-behindness: A phase model for understanding the emergence of regional embitterment. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2218886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, C., Muro, M., & Galston, W. A. (2018). Countering the geography of discontent: Strategies for left-behind places. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. (2007). Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701291617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, M., & Luca, D. (2021). The urban–rural polarisation of political disenchantment: An investigation of social and political attitudes in 30 European countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., & Le Galès, P. (Eds.). (2017). Reconfiguring European states in crisis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinossian, N. (2018). Planning strategies and practices in non-core regions: A critical response. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1361606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibert, T., & Golinski, S. (2016). Peripheralisation: The missing link in dealing with demographic change? Comparative Population Studies, 41, 255–284. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-02en
   Google Scholar
• Lobao, L., Gray, M., Cox, K., & Kitson, M. (2018). The shrinking state? Understanding the assault on the public sector. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., & Jones, M. (2018). Explaining ‘Brexit capital’: Uneven development and the austerity state. Space and Polity, 22(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1535272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Gardiner, B., Pike, A., Sunley, P., & Tyler, P. (2021). Levelling up left-behind places: The scale and nature of the policy challenge. Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Martinelli, F., & Clifton, J. (2022). Rethinking spatial policy in an era of multiple crises. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab037
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1979). In what sense a regional problem? Regional Studies, 13(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237900185191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2020). Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: Insights from the UK. Regional Studies, 54(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1619928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, M. (2017). The revolt of the Rust Belt: Place and politics in the age of anger. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S120–S152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel, P. (2018). Hinterland: America’s new landscape of class and conflict. Reaktion.
   Google Scholar
• Özatağan, G., & Eraydin, A. (2023). Political twists and turns in left-behind places: Reactions of an extractive heartland to changing state strategies. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2249505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Béal, V., Cauchi-Duval, N., Franklin, F., Kinossian, N., Lang, T., Leibert, T., MacKinnon, D., Rousseau, M., Royer, J., Servillo, L., Tomaney, J., & Velthuis, S. (2023). Left-behind places’: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1–2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., Dijkstra, L., & Poelman, H. (2023). The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. In Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy, WP 03/2023. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, M., Béal, V., & Cauchi-Duval, N. (2022). Abandon des territoires et politisation du ressentiment. AOC, 3 February. https://aoc.media/analyse/2022/02/02/abandon-des-territoires-et-politisation-du-ressentiment/
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, J., Weller, S., Barnes, T., & Beer, A. (2023). Left-behind neighbourhoods in old industrial regions. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2234942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., Blackman, M., Natarajan, L., Panayotopoulos-Tsiros, D., Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, F., & Taylor, M. (2023). Social infrastructure and ‘left-behind places’. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2224828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tups, G., Sakala, E. N., & Dannenberg, P. (2023). Hope and path development in ‘left-behind’ places – A Southern perspective. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2235396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (2019). The left-behind: Decline and rage in small-town America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar