INTRODUCTION: DEMOCRACY, COURTS AND THE DILEMMAS OF REPRESENTATION

REFERENCES

• AYLING, STANLEY. 1988. Edmund Burke: His Life and Opinions. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, RICHARD. 2003. The advent of masses and the making of the modern theory of democracy. In The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought, edited by Terence Ball and Richard Bellamy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–103.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, RICHARD. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, RICHARD. 2012. Democracy, compromise and the representation paradox: on coalition government and political integrity. Government and Opposition 47 (3): 441–65.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, RICHARD and DARIO CASTIGLIONE. 2011. Democracy by delegation? Who represents whom and how in European governance. Government and Opposition 46 (1): 101–25.
   Google Scholar
• BICKEL, ALEXANDER M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• BOBBIO, NORBERTO. 1987. The Future of Democracy: A Defence of The Rules of the Game, edited and introduced by Richard Belamy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• BURKE, EDMUND. 1774. Speech to the Electors of Bristol. London: Henry G. Bohn.
   Google Scholar
• BURKE, EDMUND. 1780. Speech on a Bill for Shortening the Duration of Parliaments. London: John C. Nimmo.
   Google Scholar
• CALDEIRA, GREGORY A., DANIEL R. KELEMEN and KEITH E. WHITTINGTON (eds). 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CHEIBUB, JOSE ANTONIO and ADAM PRZEWORSKI. 1999. Democracy, elections, and accountability for economic outcomes. In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes and Bernard Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–251.
   Google Scholar
• CHRISTIANO, THOMAS. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CONDORCET, MARQUIS DE. 1976. Essay on the application of mathematics to the theory of decision making. In Condorcet: Selected Writings, edited by K. M. Barker. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• COX, GARY W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DAHL, R. A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DEWOLFE HOWE, MARK. 1939. Juries as judges of criminal law. Harvard Law Review 52 (4): 582–616. doi: 10.2307/1334259
   Google Scholar
• DEZALAY, YVES and BRYANT G. GARTH. 2002. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• DIGGS, B. J. 1968. Practical representation. In Representation, edited by Roland J. Pennock and John W. Chapman. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• DWORKIN, RONALD. 1998. Law's Empire. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• ELY, JOHN HART. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EPSTEIN, DAVID and O'HALLORAN SHARYN. 1994. Admnistrative procedures, information, and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 697–772. doi: 10.2307/2111603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESAIASSON, PETER and SÖREN HOLMBERG. 1996. Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden. Aldershot: Darthmouth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• FEDERAL JUDICIAL CENTER. 1996. Benchbook for U.S. District Court Judges. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
   Google Scholar
• GRIFFITHS, A. PHILLIPS and RICHARD WOLLHEIM. 1960. Symposium: how can one person represent another? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 34: 187–224.
   Google Scholar
• GUARNIERI, CARLO. 2013. Judicial independence in Europe: threat or resource for democracy? Representation 49 (3): 347–59.
   Google Scholar
• GUARNIERI, CARLO and PATRIZIA PEDERZOLI. 2002. The Power of Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HOBOLT, SARA B. 2009. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HUBER, JOHN D. and CHARLES R. SHIPAN. 2000. The costs of control: legislators, agencies, and transaction costs. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 25–52. doi: 10.2307/440392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAVANAGH, AILEEN. 2009. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KLINGERMANN, H.-D., R. I. HOFFERBERT and I. BUDGE. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• KYRISTSIS, DIMITROS. 2006. Representation and Waldron's objection to judicial review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4): 733–51. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gql029
   Google Scholar
• MANIN, BERNARD. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MANIN, BERNARD, ADAM PRZEWORSKI and SUSAN C. STOKES. 1999. Introduction. In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, edited by Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes and Bernard Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–55.
   Google Scholar
• MAY, K. 1952. A set of independent, necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica 10: 680–4. doi: 10.2307/1907651
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS, PIPPA. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS, PIPPA and JONI LOVENDUSKI. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OSTROWSKI, JAMES. 2001. The rise and fall of jury nullification. Journal of Libertarian Studies 15 (2): 89–115.
   Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2012. The drive for judicial supremacy in Central and Eastern Europe. In Judicial Independence in Transition, edited by Anja Seibert-Fohr. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 619–67.
   Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2013. Romania's transnational constitution: a tradition of elite learning and self-empowerment. In The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by Denis Galligan and Mila Versteeg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 497–531.
   Google Scholar
• PETTIT, PHILIP H. 2006. Equity and the Law of Trusts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PIANA, DANIELA. 2010. Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. Farnham: Ashgate
   Google Scholar
• PITKIN, HANNA FENICHEL. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• PITKIN, HANNA FENICHEL. 2004. Representation and democracy: uneasy alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2004.00109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROGOWSKI, RONALD. 1981. Representation in political theory and in law. Ethics 91 (3): 395–430. doi: 10.1086/292250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAJÓ, ANDRÁS. 2012. Courts as representatives (lecture), available at www.fljs.org.
   Google Scholar
• SAND, LEONARD B. and JED S. RAKOFF (eds). 1993. Modern Federal Jury Instructions. New York: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• SAWARD, MICHAEL. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCHEPPELE, KIM. 2005. Democracy by judiciary. Or, why courts can be more democratic than parliaments. In Rethinking the Rule of Law After Communism, edited by Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier and Wojciech Sadurski. Budapest: Central University Press, pp. 25–61.
   Google Scholar
• SPOONER, LYSANDER. 1852. An Essay on the Trial by Jury. Boston, MA: B. Marsh.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2000. Governing with Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. (2003) Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy in The Politics of Delegation edited by Mark Thatcherr and Alec Stone Sweet. London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass, pp. 77–101
   Google Scholar
• TATE, C. NEAL and TORBJÖRN VALLINDER. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WALDRON, JEREMY. 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. The Yale Law Journal 115: 1346–406.
   Google Scholar