THE DORMANCY OF PARLIAMENTS: THE INVISIBLE CAUSE OF JUDICIARY EMPOWERMENT IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE

REFERENCES

• ALEXANDER, GEORGE and ANDREW BENNETT. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• ALTER, KAREN J. 2009. The European Court's Political Power: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BOBEK, MICHAL. 2008. The fortress of judicial independence and the mental transitions of the Central European judiciaries. European Public Law 14 (1): 99–123.
   Google Scholar
• CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN LAW INITIATIVE. 2002. Judicial reform index for Moldova. Available at www.abanet.org/ceeli, accessed 12 February 2008.
   Google Scholar
• COHEN, ANTONIN. 2010. Legal professionals or political entrepreneurs? Constitution making as a process of social construction and political mobilization. International Political Sociology 4 (2): 107–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00095.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COHEN, ANTONIN and MIKAEL R. MADSEN. 2007. Cold war law: legal entrepreneurs and the emergence of a European legal field (1945–1965). In European Ways of Law: Towards a European Sociology of Law, edited by Volkmaar Gessner and David Nelken. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 175–203.
   Google Scholar
• COLLIER, DAVID, HENRY E. BRADY and JASON SEAWRIGHT. 2004. Sources of leverage in causal inference: toward an alternative view of methodology. In Rethinking Social Inquiry, edited by Henry E. Brady and David Collier. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 161–99.
   Google Scholar
• COROCHII, NICHIFOR. 2012. President, judiciary council in Moldova. Author interview. Chisinau. 31 October.
   Google Scholar
• DELAZAY, YVES and BRYANT G. GARTH. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economics, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• DICEY, ALBERT VENN. 1897. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London and New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• FINER, S. E. 2011. The history of government from the earliest times: volume II: the intermediate ages. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207900.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• GINSBURG, TOM. 2002. Economic analysis and the design of constitutional courts. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 3 (1): 1–38. doi: 10.2202/1565-3404.1042
   Google Scholar
• GINSBURG, TOM. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GLASER, BARNEY G. and AMSELM L. STRAUSS. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• GOETZ, KLAUS H. and SIMON HIX (eds). 2011. Europeanised Politics? European Integration and National Political Systems. Ilford: Cass.
   Google Scholar
• GRABER, MARK A. 1993. The nonmajoritarian difficulty: legislative deference to the judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7 (1): 35–73. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X00000687
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2008. The judicialization of politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen and Gregory A. Caldeira. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–42.
   Google Scholar
• INGRAM, MATTHEW C. 2011. Crafting courts in new democracies: ideology and judicial council reforms in three Mexican states. Comparative Politics 4 (4): 439–58.
   Google Scholar
• IORGOVAN, ANTONIE. 1998. Odiseea elaborării Constituţiei. Târgu Mureş: Vatra Româneascã.
   Google Scholar
• KECK, MARGARET E. and KATHRYN SIKKINK. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KHMELKO, IRINA S. and DANIEL J. BEERS. 2011. Legislative oversight in the Ukrainian rada: assessing the effectiveness of parliamentary committees. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (4): 501–24. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.617553
   Google Scholar
• KING, GARY, ROBERT O. KEOHANE and SIDNEY VERBA. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KOMAREK, JAN. 2010. Former legal secretary to the President of the Czech Constitutional Court (2009–10). Author interview. Prague. 13 April.
   Google Scholar
• KORBEL, FRANTIŠEK. 2010. Deputy to Minister of Justice (2007–9). Author interview. Prague. 12 April.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, zdeněk. 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe. Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• KÜHN, ZDENĚK. 2012. Judicial administration reforms in Central-Eastern Europe. In Judicial Independence in Transition, edited by Anja Seibert-Fohr. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 603–19.
   Google Scholar
• LINEK, LUKÁŠ and ZDENKA MANSFELDOVÁ. 2007. The parliament of the Czech Republic, 1993–2004. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13 (1): 12–37. doi: 10.1080/13572330601165238
   Google Scholar
• LOCK, GEOFFREY. 1989. The 1689 bill of rights. Political Studies 37 (4): 540–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAGALHÃES, PEDRO C. 1999. The politics of judicial reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 32 (1): 43–62. doi: 10.2307/422432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARINOVIĆ ANTIČEVIĆ, INGRID. 2011. Vice-President of the Social Democratic Party (2004–6); Minister of Justice (2001–3). Author interview. Zagreb. 26 January.
   Google Scholar
• MATCZAK, MARCIN, MATYAS BENCZE and ZDENĚK KÜHN 2010. Constitutions, EU law and judicial strategies in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Journal of Public Policy 30 (1): 81–99. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X09990195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCADAM, DOUG, JOHN D. MCCARTHY and MAYER N. ZALD. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MCCUBBINS, MATHEW D. and THOMAS SCHWARTZ. 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–79. doi: 10.2307/2110792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILL, JOHN STUART. 1975 [1861]. Considerations on Representative Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MIMICA, NEVEN. 2010. MP, Social Democratic Party, and Chairman of the Committee for European Integration. Author interview. Zagreb. 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. 2012. Reform of the judiciary system. Available at http://www.justice.gov.md/category.php?l=ro&idc=155&nod=1&, accessed 10 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NICOL, DANNY. 1999. The legal constitution: United Kingdom parliament and European court of justice. The Journal of Legislative Studies 5 (1): 135–51.
   Google Scholar
• OBERTO, GIACOMO. 2010. Judge, Court of Appeal Turin; expert of the Council of Europe in the field of legal co-operation with and advice to CEE; Deputy Secretary General of the International Association of Judges. Author interview. Turin. 4 October.
   Google Scholar
• OLSON, DAVID M. and W. CROWTHER. 2002. Committees in Post-Communist Parliaments. Columbus: The Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE. 2001. Monitoring the EU accession process: judicial independence in Romania, available at http://www.eumap.org/reports/2002/judicial/international/sections/overview/2002_j_05_overview.pdf, accessed 12 March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2010. East side story: how transnational networks contested EU accession conditionality. Europe-Asia Studies 62 (9): 1527–54. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2010.515797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2012. The drive for judicial supremacy in Central and Eastern Europe. In Judicial Independence in Transition, edited by Anja Seibert-fohr. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 619–67.
   Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2013. Romania's transnational constitution: a tradition of elite learning and self-empowerment. In The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by Denis Galligan and Mila Versteeg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 497–531.
   Google Scholar
• PARAU, CRISTINA E. 2014 (forthcoming). Explaining judiciary governance in Central and Eastern Europe: external incentives, transnational elites and parliament inaction. Europe-Asia Studies (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• PARLAMENTUL REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. 2012. Dezbateri parlamentare. Sesiunea a iv-a ordinară - iulie 2012. Şedinţa din ziua de 5 iulie 2012. Chisinau: Parlamentul Republicii Moldova.
   Google Scholar
• PARLAMENTUL ROMANIEI. 2003. Dezbateri generale asupra Propunerii legislative de revizuire a Constituţiei. Şedinţa Camerei Deputaţilor din 18 iunie 2003. Bucuresti: Parlamentul Romaniei.
   Google Scholar
• PERILLI, LUCA 2011. Judge, Court of Verona; and European Commission TAIEX expert on judiciary reform. Author interview. Verona. 16 April.
   Google Scholar
• PIANA, DANIELA. 2007. Unpacking policy transfer, discovering actors: the French model of judicial education between enlargement and judicial cooperation in the EU. French Politics 5: 33–65. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200109
   Google Scholar
• PIANA, DANIELA. 2009. The power knocks at the court's back door: two waves of postcommunist judicial reform. Comparative Political Studies 42 (6): 816–40. doi: 10.1177/0010414009333049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIANA, DANIELA. 2010. Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• RAMSEYER, MARK J. 1994. The puzzling (in)dependence of courts: a comparative approach. The Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2): 721–47. doi: 10.1086/467943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RASCH, BJØRN E. and GEORGE TSEBELIS. 2011. The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda-Setting. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• REKOSH, EDWIN. 2002. Emerging Lessons from Reform Efforts in Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: Office for Democracy and Governance, U.S. Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• SACRISTE, GUILLAUME and ANTOINE VAUCHEZ. 2007. The force of international law: lawyers' diplomacy on the international scene in the 1920s. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (1): 83–107.
   Google Scholar
• SADURSKI, WOJCIECH. 2008. Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts of Post-Communist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• SADURSKI, WOJCIECH. 2012. Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCHARPF, FRITZ WILHELM. 1997. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCHWARTZ, HERMAN 2000. The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• SEIBERT-FOHR, ANJA (ed.). 2012. Judicial Independence in Transition. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ŠEKS, VLADIMIR. 2011. Attorney (1972–81); main drafter of the 1991 Constitution of Croatia; Deputy Speaker, Croatian Parliament (2003–8). Author interview. Zagreb. 26 January.
   Google Scholar
• SHAPIRO, MARTIN. 2002. Political jurisprudence. In On Law, Politics & Judicialization, edited by Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• SMITHEY, SHANNON ISHIYAMA and JOHN ISHIYAMA. 2000. Judicious choices: designing courts in post-communist politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 33: 163–82. doi: 10.1016/S0967-067X(00)00002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STANOIU, RODICA. 2009. Romanian Justice Minister (2001–4). Author interview. Bucharest. 10 October.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2000. Governing with Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TARKOW, I. NAAMANI. 1943. The significance of the act of settlement in the evolution of English democracy. Political Science Quarterly 58 (4): 537–61. doi: 10.2307/2144947
   Google Scholar
• THATCHER, MARK and ALEC STONE SWEET. 2003. Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. In The Politics of Delegation, edited by Mark Thatcher and Alec Stone Sweet. Portland, OR and London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• TSEBELIS, GEORGE. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VAUCHEZ, ANTOINE. 2008. The force of a weak field: law and lawyers in the government of the European Union (for a renewed research agenda). International Political Sociology 2: 128–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAUCHEZ, ANTOINE. 2010. The making of the European Union's constitutional foundations: the brokering role of legal entrepreneurs and networks. In Transnational Networks in Regional Integration: Governing Europe 1945–1983, edited by Wolfram Kaiser, Brigitte Leucht and Michael Gehler. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 108–29.
   Google Scholar
• VOIGT, STEFAN and ELI M. SALZBERGER. 2002. Choosing not to choose: when politicians choose to delegate powers. Kyklos 55 (2): 289–310. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHITTINGTON, KEITH E. 2005. ‘Interpose your friendly hand’: political supports for the exercise of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court. The American Political Science Review 99 (4): 583–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZUBEK, RADOSLAW. 2011. Negative agenda control and executive-legislative relations in East Central Europe, 1997–2008. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (2): 172–92. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.574025
   Google Scholar