JUDICIALISATION, DEMOCRACY AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION

REFERENCES

• ALTER, KAREN. 1998. Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’?: European governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1): 121–47. doi: 10.1162/002081898550572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALTER, KAREN. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ALTER, KAREN. 2009. The European Court's Political Power: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BARAK, AHARON. 2006. The Judge in a Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BELLAMY, RICHARD. 2008. The democratic constitution: why Europeans should avoid American style constitutional judicial review. European Political Science 7: 9–20. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BICKEL, ALEXANDER. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• blauberger, michael. 2012. With Luxembourg in mind … the remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (1):109–26.
   Google Scholar
• BURLEY, ANNE-MARIE and WALTER MATTLI. 1993. Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration. International Organization 47: 41–76. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAPORASO, JAMES and SYDNEY TARROW. 2009. Polanyi in Brusssels. International Organization 63 (4): 593–620. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309990099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL. 2006. Courts, rights and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies 39: 50–75. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL and ALEC STONE SWEET. 2003. Participation, representative democracy and the courts. In Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Bruce E. Cain, Russell J. Dalton and Susan E. Scarrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192–220.
   Google Scholar
• CONANT, LISA. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CONANT, LISA. 2006. Individuals, courts, and the development of European social rights. Comparative Political Studies 39 (1): 76–100. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAHL, ROBERT. 1957. Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.
   Google Scholar
• DAVIS, MICHAEL H. 1987. A government of judges: an historical re-view. American Journal of Comparative Law 35: 559–80. doi: 10.2307/840481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DWORKIN, RONALD. 1996. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EISGRUBER, CHRISTOPHER. 2001. Constitutional Self-government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• everson, michelle. 2010. Is the European Court of Justice a legal or political institution now? The Guardian, 10 August. Available at www.theguardian.com (accessed 30 September 2013).
   Google Scholar
• FEREJOHN, JOHN. 2002. Judicializing politics, politicizing law. Law & Contemporary Problems 65 (3): 41–68. doi: 10.2307/1192402
   Google Scholar
• FEREJOHN, JOHN and PASQUALE, PASQUINO. 2003. Rule of democracy and rule of law. In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by J. M. Maraval and A. Przeworski. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–60.
   Google Scholar
• FEREJOHN, JOHN and PASQUALE PASQUINO. 2010. The countermajoritarian opportunity. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13: 353.
   Google Scholar
• FERRY, JEAN MARC and PAUL THIBAUD. 1992. Discussion sur l'Europe. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
   Google Scholar
• FOLLESDAL, ANDREAS and SIMON HIX. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (3): 533–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• friedman, barry. 1998. History of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part one. NYU Law Review 73 (2): 333.
   Google Scholar
• friedman, barry. 2009. The Will of the People. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• GUARNIERI, CARLO and PATRIZIA PEDERZOLI. 2001. The Power of Judges: A Comparatvive Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• habermas, jürgen. 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review 11 (Sept–Oct): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• HERZOG, ROMAN and LÜDER GERKEN. 2008. Stoppt den Europäischen Gerichtshof. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 9 August.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2008. The judicialization of politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by K. Whittington and G. Calderia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–41.
   Google Scholar
• HÖPNER, MARTIN and ARMIN SCHÄFER. 2012. Embeddedness and regional integration: waiting for Polanyi in a Hayekian setting. International Organization 66 (3): 429–55. doi: 10.1017/S002081831200015X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2006. Suing for Europe: adversarial legalism and European governance. Comparative Political Studies 39 (1): 101–27. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2012a. Eurolegalism and democracy. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (S1): 55–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2012c. Talking about the European Court: discourses of judging in the European Union. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 58: 139–57. doi: 10.1108/S1059-4337(2012)0000058009
   Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2012d. The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (1): 43–58. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.632127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• keller, helen and alec stone sweet (eds). 2008. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KOMMERS, DONALD. 1997. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LACROIX, JUSTINE. 2002. For a European constitutional patriotism. Political Studies 50: 944–58. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAMBERT, EDOUARD. 1921. Le gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation social aux Etats-Unis. Paris: M. Giard & Cie.
   Google Scholar
• LANDFRIED, CHRISTINE. 1992. Judicial policy-making in Germany: the federal constitutional court. West European Politics 15: 50–67. doi: 10.1080/01402389208424920
   Google Scholar
• MADURO, MIGUEL. 1998. We, the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MORAVCSIK, ANDREW. 2000. The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2): 217–52. doi: 10.1162/002081800551163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEDERZOLI, PATRICIA and CARLO GUARNIERI. 1997. The judicialization of politics, Italian style. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 2 (3): 321–36. doi: 10.1080/13545719708454956
   Google Scholar
• rasmussen, hjalte. 1986. On law and policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• rawls, john. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• scharpf, fritz. 2009. Legitimacy in the multilevel European polity. MPIfG Working Paper 09/1. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• SCHEPEL, HARM and ERHARD BLANKENBURG. 2001. Mobilizing the European Court of Justice. In The European Court of Justice, edited by G. De Búrca and J. Weiler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• schmidt, susanne and r. daniel kelemen (eds) 2012. Perpectual Momentum? Reconsidering the power of the European Court of Justice. Special issue of Journal of European Public Policy 19 (1).
   Google Scholar
• SHAPIRO, MARTIN. 1981. Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• shapiro, martin. 2001. The institutionalization of European administrative space. In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz and Neil Fligstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–112.
   Google Scholar
• SHAPIRO, MARTIN and ALEC STONE SWEET. 1994. The new constitutional politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 397–420. doi: 10.1177/0010414094026004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• shapiro, martin and alec stone sweet. 2002. On Law, Politics and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SLAUGHTER, ANNE-MARIE, ALEC, STONE SWEET and JOSEPH WEILER (eds). 1998. The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• STARR-DEELEN, DONNA and BART DEELEN. 1996. The European Court of Justice as a federator. Publius 26 (4): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2010. The European Court of Justice and the judicialization of EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance 5. Available at http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2010-2/.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC and THOMAS. BRUNELL 2013. Trustee courts and the judicialization of international regimes: the politics of majoritarian activism in the ECTHR, the EU, and the WTO. Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1): 61–88. doi: 10.1086/668499
   Google Scholar
• TATE, C. NEAL and TORBJÖRN VALLINDER (eds). 1997. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VOLCANSEK, MARY. 1994. Political power and judicial review in Italy. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4): 492–509. doi: 10.1177/0010414094026004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VOLCANSEK, MARY. 1999. Constitutional Politics in Italy: The Constitutional Court. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• WALDRON, JEREMY. 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. The Yale Law Journal 115: 1346–406. doi: 10.2307/20455656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEILER, JOSEPH H. H. 1991. The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–83. doi: 10.2307/796898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIND, MARLENE. 2010. The Nordics, the EU and the reluctance towards supranational judicial review. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 1039–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02085.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar