MOBILISATION, LITIGATION AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

REFERENCES

• ALTER, KAREN J. 2012. The global spread of European style international courts. West European Politics 35: 135–54. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANAGNOSTOU, DIA. 2010. Does European human rights law matter? Implementation and domestic impact of Strasbourg Court judgments on minority-related policies. International Journal of Human Rights 14 (5): 721–43. doi: 10.1080/13642980903205417
   Google Scholar
• BARCLAY, SCOTT, LYNN JONES and ANNA-MARIA MARSHALL. 2011. Two spinning wheels: studying law and social movements. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 54: 1–16. doi: 10.1108/S1059-4337(2011)0000054004
   Google Scholar
• bernstein, MARY, ANNA-MARIA MARSHALL and SCOTT BARCLAY. 2009. The challenges of law: sexual orientation, gender identity and social movements. In Queer Mobilisations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, edited by Scott Barclay, Anna-Maire Marshall and Michael Bernstein. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• CAFLISCH, LUCIUS. 2006. The reform of the European Court of Human Rights: Protocol No. 14 and beyond. Human Rights Law Review 6: 403–15. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngl007
   Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL A. 2006a. Courts, rights and democratic participation. Comparative Political Studies 39: 50–75. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL A. 2006b. Courts, democracy and governance. Comparative Political Studies 39: 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL A. 2011. Civil society and the European Court of Human Rights. In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Mikael Madsen and Jonas Christoffersen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• CICHOWSKI, RACHEL and ALEC STONE SWEET. 2003. Participation, representative democracy and the courts. In Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Bruce Cain, Russell Dalton and Susan Scarrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192–220.
   Google Scholar
• COLLINS, PAUL. 2008. Friends of the Court: Interests Groups and Judicial Decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• costain, anne n. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DOLIDZE, ANNA. 2013. Making international property law: the role of amici curiae in international decision-making. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 40: 119–54.
   Google Scholar
• DOR, GAL and MENACHEM HOFNUNG. 2006. Litigation as political participation. Israel Studies 11 (2): 131–57. doi: 10.2979/ISR.2006.11.2.131
   Google Scholar
• GINSBURG, TOM. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GREER, STEVEN. 2006. The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HARLOW, CAROL and RICHARD RAWLINGS. 1992. Pressure Through Law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HELFER, LAURENCE and ERIK VOETEN. 2012. International courts as agents of legal change: evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. SSRN Working paper. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfmabstract_id=1850526
   Google Scholar
• HODSON, LOVEDAY. 2011. NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• KATZENSTEIN, MARY. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and Military. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MADSEN, MIKAEL RASK. 2007. From Cold War instrument to supreme European Court: the European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics. Law & Social Inquiry 32 (1): 109–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00053.x
   Google Scholar
• MARKS, GARY and DOUG MCADAM. 1996. Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. In Governance in the European Union, edited by Gary Marks, Fritz Scharpf, Phillipe Schmitter and Wolfgang Streek. London: Sage Publications, pp. 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• MARSHALL, ANNA-MARIA. 2006. Social movement strategies and the participatory potential of litigation. In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, edited by Austin Sarat and Stuart Scheingold. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 166–81.
   Google Scholar
• MCCANN, MICHAEL W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• morris, aldon. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOWBRAY, ALASTAIR. 2009. Crisis measures of institutional reform for the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 9 (4): 647–56. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngp023
   Google Scholar
• o'connor, karen. 1980. Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• POLAKIEWCZ, JORG. 1996. The application of the European Convention on Human Rights in domestic law. Human Rights Law Journal 17: 405–11.
   Google Scholar
• POLAKIEWCZ, JORG and VALERIE JACOB-foltzer. 1991. The European Human Rights Convention in domestic law. Human Rights Law Journal 12 (3): 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• SARAT, AUSTIN and STUART SCHEINGOLD (eds). 2006. Cause Lawyering and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SHAPIRO, MARTIN. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• SIMMONS, BETH. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SMITH-CANNOY, HEATHER. 2012. Insincere Commitments, Human Rights Treaties, Abusive States, and Citizen Activism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. HELENKELLER, 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC and HELEN KELLER. 2008. The reception of the ECHR in national legal orders. In A Europe of Rights, edited by Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• TARROW, SIDNEY. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TOLLEY, MICHAEL C. 2012. Judicialisation of politics in Europe: keeping pace with Strasbourg. Journal of Human Rights 11 (1): 66–84. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2012.648151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VANHALA, LISA. 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ZEMANS, FRANCES. 1983. Legal mobilisation: the neglected role of the law in political systems. American Political Science Review 77: 690–70. doi: 10.2307/1957268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar