6,018
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

THE DEMOCRATIC QUALITIES OF COURTS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THREE ARGUMENTS

Pages 333-346 | Published online: 17 Oct 2013

REFERENCES

  • ACKERMAN, B. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • BELLAMY, R. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • BELLAMY, R. 2011. Political constitutionalism and the Human Rights Act. International Journal of Constitutional Law (I-Con) 9: 86–111. doi: 10.1093/icon/mor024
  • BELLAMY, R. 2012. Rights as democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4): 449–71. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2012.699398
  • BICKEL, A. 1986, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • CHRISTIANO, T. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • DAHL, R. A. 1957. Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as national policymaker. Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.
  • DWORKIN, R. 1996. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • ELY, J. H. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • HABERMAS, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • HAND, L. 1953. The contribution of an independent judiciary to civilization. In The Spirit of Liberty, edited by I. Dillard. New York: Knopf.
  • HAND, L. 1958. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • HAY, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • HIRSCHL, R. 2004 .Towards Juristocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • HOLMES, S. 2003. Lineages of the rule of law. In Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by J. M. Maravall and A. Przeworski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chap. 1.
  • IRONS, PETER H. 1988. The Courage of their Convictions. New York: Free Press.
  • KAVANAGH, A. 2003. Participation and judicial review: a reply to Jeremy Waldron. Law and Philosophy 22: 451–86.
  • KLINGERMANN, H.-D., R. I. HOFFERBERT and I. BUDGE. 1994. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Oxford: Westview Press.
  • KYRITSIS, D. 2006. Representation and Waldron's objection to judicial review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4): 733–51. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gql029
  • MANSBRIDGE, J. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
  • ORDESHOOK, P. C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • PETTIT, P. 2000. Democracy: electoral and contestatory. In Designing Democratic Institutions, edited by I. Shapiro and S. Macedo. New York: New York University Press, pp. 105–44.
  • PITKIN, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • RAWLS, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • ROSENBERG, G. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • SEGAL, J. A. and H. J. SPAETH. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • TUSHNET, M. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • WALDRON, J. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.