The Democratic Deficit in South Korea: The 2012 Presidential Election and its Aftermath

REFERENCES

• Anderson, C. J. and M. M. Singer. 2008. The sensitive left and the impervious right: multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 564–99. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J. and Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2001. Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–38. doi: 10.1177/0192512101022004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrain, Charles F. and James Thomas Smith. 2006. Political Democracy, Trust, and Social Justice: A Comparative Overview. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2004. Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior 26 (3): 271–87. doi: 10.1023/B:POBE.0000043456.87303.3a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, John M. and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catterberg, Gabriela and Alejandro Moreno. 2006. The individual bases of political trust: trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1): 31–48. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Eric C. C. and Yun-Han Chu. 2006. Corruption and trust: exceptionalism in Asian democracies? Journal of Politics 68 (2): 259–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croissant, Aurel. 2002. Electoral politics in Southeast and East Asia: A comparative perspective. In Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia, edited by Gabriele Bruns, Marei John and Aurel Croissant. Singapore: Friederich Ebert Stiftung, pp. 321–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Stefan, Jonas Linde and Soren Holmberg. 2013. Dissatisfied democrats. QoG Working Paper Series (8): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S. and R. R. Kaufman. 1994. The challenges of consolidation. Journal of Democracy 5 (4): 5–16. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0067
   Google Scholar
• Hahm, Chaibong. 2008. South Korea's miraculous democracy. Journal of Democracy 19 (3): 128–42. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, John R. and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2001. What Is It about Government That Americans Dislike? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, John R. and Susan Welch. 1997. The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections, 1982–1990. The Journal of Politics 59 (1): 226–39. doi: 10.2307/2998224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Vol. 4. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C. and Michael A. Dimock. 1994. Checking out: the effects of bank overdrafts on the 1992 house elections. American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 601–24. doi: 10.2307/2111599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Samuel S. 2003. Korea's Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Heemin, Jun Young Choi and Jinman Cho. 2008. Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: an empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral Studies 27 (1): 136–50. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Development Institute. 2006. A Report on a Survey and Policy Analysis for Enhancing Social Capital in South Korea [in Korean]. Seoul: Korea Development Institute, School of Public Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Arthur and Ola Listhaug. 1999. Political performance and institutional trust. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance, edited by Norris, Pippa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 204–16. doi: 10.1093/0198295685.003.0010
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard and AndrÉ Blais. 1993. Accepting the election outcome: the effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 553–63. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006736
   Google Scholar
• National Assembly Research Service (NARS). 2014. Analyses of Legislative Effects of Legislative Gender Quotas by Election Law 47–3 and 47–4 [in Korean]. Seoul: National Assembly of Korea: 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Chong-Min. 2004. Support for democracy in Korea: its trends and determinants. Presented at the Conference on ‘The State of Democracy in Asia’, Bangkok, Thailand, 21 October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. BinghamJr and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414. doi: 10.2307/2111378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes and Bernard Manin. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo. 2009. Creating political legitimacy electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist 53 (3): 311–30. doi: 10.1177/0002764209338795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Bo and Jan Teorell. 2008. What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21 (2): 165–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, David. 2004. Presidentialism and accountability for the economy in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review 98 (3): 425–36. doi: 10.1017/S000305540400125X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew Soberg and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C. 2005. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99 (03): 315–25. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert. 2011. Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges: evidence from Ireland. The Journal of Politics 73 (01): 187–201. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, Steven. 2004. Perceptions of administrative performance: the key to trust in government? KUL.Nieuwe Reeks Van Doctoraten in De Sociale Wetenschappen 79.
   Google Scholar