Welfare State and Representation: Do Women Make the Welfare State or Does the Welfare State Make Women Representatives?

REFERENCES

• Adema, W. and M. Ladaique. 2009. How expensive is the welfare state?: gross and net indicators in the OECD social expenditure database (SOCX). OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No 92, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzendahl, C. and C. Brooks. 2007. Women's political representation and welfare state spending in 12 capitalist democracies. Social Forces 85: 1509–34. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, N. K. and S. Guo. 2012. Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, K. 2006. Substantive representation of women: the representation of women's interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian parliament (1900–1979). Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (2): 85–114. doi:10.1300/J501v28n02_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croissant, Y. and G. Millo. 2008. Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/plm/vignettes/plm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, R., S. Welch and J. Clark. 1994. Women, Elections, & Representation. 2nd re. ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, xiv, 276p.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, C., M. Franklin, F. Demant and W. van der Brug. 2007. The endogenous economy: “real” economic conditions, subjective economic evaluations and government support. Acta Politica 42 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity, xi,248p.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M. 1998. Women in politics & gender equity in policy: South Africa & Uganda. Review of African Political Economy 25 (76): 241–62. doi: 10.1080/03056249808704312
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E. and J. D. Stephens. 2000. Partisan governance, women's employment, and the social democratic service state. American Sociological Review 65: 323–4. doi: 10.2307/2657460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E. and J. D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. and F. Rosenbluth. 2008. Work and power: the connection between female labor force participation and female political representation. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 479–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.151342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, L. and M. Malami. 1999. Gender inequality in political representation: a worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68. doi: 10.2307/3005796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M. C. 2011. Women, parties and platforms in post-industrial democracies. Party Politics 17 (1): 66–92. doi: 10.1177/1354068809361012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L. 2010. Women's representation in parliament: a qualitative comparative analysis. Political Studies 58 (5): 886–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunovich, S., and P. Paxton. 2005. Pathways to power: the role of political parties in women's national political representation. American Journal of Sociology 111 (2): 505–52. doi: 10.1086/444445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. and P. Norris. 2003. Westminster women: the politics of presence. Political Studies 51 (1): 84–102. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E. 1998. Women's representation in national legislatures: developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–25. doi: 10.2307/440217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh, E. 2010. It takes a state: a policy feedback model of women's political representation. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 69–91. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709992672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. and G. Shackman. 1996. Gender and authority: a cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly 77 (2): 273–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narud, H. M. and H. Valen. 2000. Does social background matter? In Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience, edited by P. Esaiasson and K. Heidar. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. and J. Lovenduski. 1993. Gender and party politics in Britain. In Gender and Party Politics, edited by J. Lovenduski and P. Norris. London: Sage, x, 358p.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, A. and E. Almquist. 1993. Women in national legislatures. Population Research and Policy Review 12 (1): 71–81. doi: 10.1007/BF01074510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2015). Social Expenditure Database (SOCX) 1980-2011-2014 (downloaded 23.10.2015). Available at http://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. 1997. Women in national legislatures: a cross-national analysis. Social Science Research 26: 442–64. doi: 10.1006/ssre.1997.0603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggione, S. 2004. Exploring gender differences in state legislators' policy preferences. Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbluth, F., R. Salmond and M. F. Thies. 2006. Welfare works: explaining female legislative representation. Politics and Gender 2 (2): 165–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, W. 1987. Electoral systems, contextual factors and women's opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. The Western Political Quarterly 40 (3): 477–98. doi: 10.2307/448386
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E. and R. G. Lomax. 2004. A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. 2006. Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A. 2000. Women's representation in legislatures and cabinets in industrial democracies. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 21 (2): 197–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solvak, M. 2011. Private member's bills in parliament—a comprehensive study of Finland and Estonia. PhD thesis. Tartu University.
   Google Scholar
• Stockemer, D. and M. Byrne. 2011. Women's representation around the world: the importance of women's participation in the workforce. Parliamentary Affairs 65 (4): 802–821. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, D. 2013. Comparative Political Parties Dataset: Electoral, Legislative, and Government Strength of Political Parties by Ideological Group in 21 Capitalist Democracies, 1950–2011. Department of Political Science, Marquette University. Available at http://www.marquette.edu/polisci/faculty_swank.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. 1998. Are women more likely to vote for women's issue bills than their male colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48. doi: 10.2307/440362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, F. C. and M. S. Williams. 2010. Incentives for personal votes and women's representation in legislatures. Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1575–600. doi: 10.1177/0010414010374017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vega, A. and J. M. Firestone. 1995. The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22. doi: 10.2307/440448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. 2000a. Testing the politics of presence: women's representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 67–91. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. 2000b. Representing women. In Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience, edited by P. Esaiasson and K. Heidar. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar