Ballot Reform and the Decline of Third Parties in State Legislatures

REFERENCES

• Albright, S. D. 1942. The American Ballot. Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Argersinger, P. H. 1980. ‘A place on the ballot’: fusion politics and antifusion laws. The American Historical Review 85 (2): 287–306. doi: 10.2307/1860557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. 2007. Electoral laws as political consequences: explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions. Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 363–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.101608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensel, R. F. 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby, J. F. and L. S. Maisel 2003. Two Parties-or More? The American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burden, B. C. 2007. Ballot regulations and multiparty politics in the states. PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (04): 669–73. doi: 10.1017/S1049096507071065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, C. and M. P. Wattenberg. 1999. Strategically unambitious: Minor party and independent candidates in the 1996 congressional elections. In The State of the Parties, edited by J. C. Green and D. M. Shea, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 229–250.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W. and J. M. Kousser. 1981. Turnout and rural corruption: New York as a test case. American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 646–63. doi: 10.2307/2110757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespin, M. H. 2004. Direct Primaries and the Openness of the Two Party System, 1904–1920. Unpublished Manuscript. Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Dakota, S. 1897. Enabling Act and Constitution of South Dakota: Constitution Adopted October 1, 1889: Amendments to Date, 1897: Official Publication. Pierre, SD: Carter Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, M. J. 2007. Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures: A Year by Year Summary, 1796–2006. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. 1964. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, E. J. and S. Kernell. 2005. Manufactured responsiveness: the impact of state electoral laws on unified party control of the presidency and House of Representatives, 1840–1940. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 531–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, E. C. 1917. A History of the Australian Ballot System in the United States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, R. W. 1982. North Carolina democrats and silver fusion politics. North Carolina Historical Review 59 (3): 230–251.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J. D. 2012. Challengers to Duopoly Why Third Parties Matter in American Two-party Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haines, M. R. 2010. Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790–2002 Available at http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02896.v3.
   Google Scholar
• Heckelman, J. C. 1995. The effect of the secret ballot on voter turnout rates. Public Choice 82 (1/2): 107–24. doi: 10.1007/BF01047732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, S. and J. M. Snyder Jr. 2007. The decline of third-party voting in the United States. The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.2307/4639929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, V. O. J. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keyssar, A. 2001. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S. and P. Squire. 1995. The politics of institutional choice: presidential ballot access for third parties in the United States. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 419–27. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ludington, A. C. 1911. American Ballot Laws, 1888–1910 (reprint ed.). Charleston, SC: BiblioLife, LLC (2009 reprint).
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. F. and R. A. Moffitt. 1980. The uses of Tobit analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics 62 (2): 318–21. doi: 10.2307/1924766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, C. E. 1908. Primary Elections: A Study of the History and Tendencies of Primary Election Legislation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, C. E. and L. Overacker. 1928. Primary Elections. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. D. 2014. The effect of the secret ballot on party system fragmentation: a test of three competing arguments. Politics 34 (4): 378–90. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. F. and R. L. McCormick 1986. Outlawing ‘treachery’: split tickets and ballot laws in New York and New Jersey, 1880–1910. The Journal of American History 72 (4): 835–58. doi: 10.2307/1908893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. 1982. The two-party system and Duverger’s law: an essay on the history of political science. The American Political Science Review 76 (4): 753–66. doi: 10.2307/1962968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, S. J., R. L. Behr and E. H. Lazarus. 1996. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, J. G. 1970. The effect of the Australian ballot reform on split ticket voting: 1876–1908. The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1220–38. doi: 10.2307/1958367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusk, J. G. 2001. A Statistical History of the American Electorate. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, H. A. 1986. Ballot format in plurality partisan elections. In Electoral laws and their political consequences, edited by B. Grofman and A. Lijphart. New York: Algora Publishing, pp. 242–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schraufnagel, S. 2011. Third Party Blues: The Truth and Consequences of Two Party Dominance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schraufnagel, S. and K. Milita. 2010. The partisan duopoly in us house elections: an analysis of minor party failure. Representation 46 (2): 241–53. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2010.485855
   Google Scholar
• Squire, P., K. E. Hamm, R. D. Hedlund and G. F. Moncrief. 2005. Electoral reforms, membership stability and the existence of committee property rights in American state legislatures. British Journal of Political Science 35 (01): 169–81. doi: 10.1017/S0007123405000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, M. S. J. and S. W. Stedman. 1950. Discontent at the Polls; a Study of Farmer and Labor Parties, 1827–1948. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, J. L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. 1984. Diffusion of public policy innovation among the American states. The American Political Science Review 63 (3 (Sep., 1969)): 880–99. doi: 10.3886/icpsr00066.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. D. 2005. The ballot as a party-system switch: the role of the Australian ballot in party-system change and development in the USA. Party Politics 11 (2): 217–41. doi: 10.1177/1354068805049777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A. 2000. Anti-partism and party control of political reform in the United States: the case of the Australian ballot. British Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A. 2002. The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigmore, J. H. 1889. The Australian Ballot System as Embodied in the Legislation of Various Countries: With an Historical Introduction, and an Appendix of Decisions since 1856 in Great Britain, Ireland, Canada, and Australia. Boston, MA: Boston Book Company.
   Google Scholar