‘Friends and Neighbors’ Voting Under Mixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems: Evidence from Lithuania

References

• André, A., Depauw, S., Shugart, M. S., & Chytilek, R. (Forthcoming). Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems: Do preference votes matter? Party Politics. doi: 10.1177/1354068815610974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, A., Wauters, B., & Pilet, J.-B. (2012). It's not only about lists: Explaining preference voting in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 22(3), 293–313. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2012.692374
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954 [1986]). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. E., & Schoppa, L. J. (2002). Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems: Theory and evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies, 35(9), 1027–1053. doi: 10.1177/001041402237505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. F., Olivella, S., Malecki, M., & Sher, M. (2013). Vote-earning strategies in flexible list systems: seats at the price of unity. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 658–669. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, H. (1986). Politics, self, and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Arzheimer, K., Campbell, R., & Cowley, P. (2017). Candidate localness and voter choice in the 2015 general election in England. Political Geography, 59, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Duran, J. J., Poire, A., & Rojas Nandapaya, L. (2004). Spatial and temporal effects in Mexican direct elections for the Chamber of Deputies. Political Geography, 23, 529–548. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F., & Herron, E. S. (2005). Going it alone? Strategic entry under mixed electoral rules. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 16–31. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F., Herron, E. S., & Nishikawa, M. (2005). Mixed electoral systems: Contamination and its consequences. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, J. (2003). Parliamentary elections in Lithuania, October 2000. Electoral Studies, 22(1), 161–165. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimpel, J. G., Karnes, K., McTague, J., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2008). Distance-decay in the political geography of friends and neighbors voting. Political Geography, 27, 231–252. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorecki, M. A., & Marsh, M. (2012). Not just 'friends and neighbours’: Canvassing, geographic proximity and voter choice. European Journal of Political Research, 51(5), 563–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S. (2002). Mixed electoral rules and party strategies: Responses to incentives by Ukraine's Rukh and Russia's Yabloko. Party Politics, 8(6), 719–733. doi: 10.1177/1354068802008006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S., Nemoto, K., & Nishikawa, M. (2018a). Reconciling approaches in the study of mixed-member electoral systems. In E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), Oxford handbook of electoral systems (pp. 445–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S., Pekkanen, R., & Shugart, M. S. (2018b). Terminology and basic rules of electoral systems. In E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S., & Nishikawa, M. (2001). Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed-superposition electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 20(1), 63–86. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (2006). Putting voters in their place: Geography and elections in Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jurkynas, M. (2005). The 2004 presidential and parliamentary elections in Lithuania. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkynas, M. (2009). The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2008. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 329–333. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkynas, M. (2014). The parliamentary election in Lithuania, October 2012. Electoral Studies, 34, 334–338. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. S., & Steen, J. A. (2004). The effects of ballot position on election outcomes. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 267–281. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, E., Nemoto, K., & Pekkanen, R. (2012). Reverse contamination: Burning and building bridges in mixed-member systems. Comparative Political Studies, 45(6), 747–773. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuzer, M., & Pettai, V. (2003). Patterns of political Instability: affiliation patterns of politicians and voters in post-Communist Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(2), 76–98. doi: 10.1007/BF02686269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupavicius, A. (1997). The Lithuanian parliamentary elections of 1996. Electoral Studies, 16(4), 541–549. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(97)87813-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Rice, T. W. (1983). Localism in presidential elections: The home state advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 27(3), 548–556. doi: 10.2307/2110984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, G. (2010). First come, first served: The effect of ballot position on electoral success in open ballot PR elections. Representation, 46(2), 167–181. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2010.485808
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, K. (2014). Electoral contexts that assist voter coordination: Ballot position effects in Poland. Electoral Studies, 33(March), 322–334. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, K., & Stegmaier, M. (2015). Ballot position effects under compulsory and optional preferential-list PR electoral systems. Political Behavior, 37(2), 465–486. doi: 10.1007/s11109-014-9294-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massicotte, L., & Blais, A. (1999). Mixed electoral systems: A conceptual and empirical survey. Electoral Studies, 18(3), 341–366. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G. (2001). Unexpected outcomes: Electoral systems, political parties, and representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G., & Scheiner, E. (2005). Strategic ticket splitting and the personal vote in mixed-member electoral systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 259–276. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G., & Scheiner, E. (2012). Electoral systems and political context: How the effects of rules vary across new and established democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, T. W., & Macht, A. A. (1987). Friends and neighbors voting in statewide general elections. American Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 448–452. doi: 10.2307/2111084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., & Wattenberg, M. (2001). Mixed member electoral systems: Best of both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. (2010). Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag. Electoral Studies, 29(3) 484–496. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatalovich, R. (1975). "Friends and neighbors" voting: Mississippi, 1943-73. The Journal of Politics, 37(3), 807–814. doi: 10.2307/2129327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2010). Effect of local ties on electoral success and parliamentary behaviour: The Case of Estonia. Party Politics, 16(2), 215–235. doi: 10.1177/1354068809341053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar