Filling the Void? Political Responsiveness of Populist Parties

References

• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In D. Albertazzi & D. Mcdonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andreadis, I., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). European populist parties in government: How well are voters Represented? Evidence from Greece. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 485–508. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpu011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardi, L., Bartolini, S., & Trechsel, A. H. (2014). Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics, 37(2), 235–252. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biorcio, R. (2014). The reasons for the success and transformations of the 5 Star movement. Contemporary Italian Politics, 6(1), 37–53. doi: 10.1080/23248823.2014.884376
   Google Scholar
• Bodlos, A., & Plescia, C. (2018). The 2017 Austrian snap election: A shift rightward. West European Politics, 41(6), 1354–1363. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1429057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). # ausvotes: How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics and Culture, 44(2), 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1984). ‘People’, politicians and populism 1. Government and Opposition, 19(3), 312–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1984.tb01048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloca, P., & Corbetta, P. (2015). Beyond protest: Issues and ideological inconsistencies in the voters of the movimento 5 Stelle. In F. Tronconi (Ed.), Beppe Grillo’s five Star movement: Organisation, communication and ideology (pp. 195–211). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• De Sio, L., & Weber, T. (2014). Issue yield: A model of party strategy in multidimensional space. American Political Science Review, 108(4), 870–885. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, F. (2015). Alternative für Deutschland und Pegida: Die Ankunft des neuen Rechtspopulismus in der Bundesrepublik. In F. Decker, B. Henningsen, & K. A. Jakobsen (Eds.), Rechtspopulismus und Rechtsextremismus in Europa (pp. 75–90). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• De Sio, L., De Angelis, A., & Emanuele, V. (2017). Issue yield and party strategy in Multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies. doi: 0010414017730082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sio, L., & Lachat, R. (2018). Making sense of party strategy innovation: Challenge to ideology and conflict mobilisation as dimensions of party competition. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Diamanti, I. (1996). Il male del Nord: Lega, localismo, secessione (Vol. 33). Donzelli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Ferrera, M. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., & Hellwig, T. (2014). Responding to voters or responding to markets? Political parties and public opinion in an era of globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 816–827. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van't Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61(2), 399–442. doi: 10.1017/S0020818307070142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 202–230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T. T. (2001). Interdependence, government constraints, and economic voting. The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1141–1162. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hino, A. (2012). New challenger parties in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. doi: 10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Ruth, S. P. (2017). Mind the gap! populism, participation and representation in Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 462–484. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, R., & Rovira, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.572619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J. C., & Lefkofridi, Z. (2018). Responsive versus responsible? Party democracy in times of crisis. Party Politics (forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancinging parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 185–199. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., & Spoon, J.-J. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties and issue attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 633–654. doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., & Pappas, T. S. (2015). Populism and crisis: A fuzzy relationship. In H. Kriesi, & T. S. Pappas (Eds.), European populism in the shadow of the great recession (pp. 303–325). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, M., Giebler, H., & Wagner, A. (2016). Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland. Eine empirische Einordnung der Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2013 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der AfD. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 57(2), 247–275. doi: 10.5771/0032-3470-2016-2-247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther, K. R. (1987). Austria's future and Waldheim's past: The significance of the 1986 elections. West European Politics, 10(3), 376–399. doi: 10.1080/01402388708424639
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus Responsible Government. MplfG Working Paper 09/8.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2011). Bini Smaghi vs. The Parties: Representative Government and Institutional Constraints, EUI Working Paper, RSCAS 2011/22.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2014). Representative versus responsible government. In P. Mair (Ed.), On parties, party systems and democracy (pp. 581–596). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2001). Democracies and the populist challenge. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. 2008. Democracy and changes: how research tails reality. West European Politics 31 (1-2): 40–59. doi: 10.1080/01402380701833715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. (2012). The class basis of the cleavage between the New left and the radical right: An analysis for Austria, Denmark, Norway and Switzerland. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Class politics and the radical right (pp. 31–52). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. (2011). Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(1), 97–119. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2011.539483
   Google Scholar
• Plescia, C., Kritzinger, S., & Oberluggauer, P. (in press). Parties’ issue strategies on the drawing board: The 2017 Austrian Case. West European Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. doi: 10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarzazu, I., & Klüver, H. (2017). Coalition governments and party competition: Political communication strategies of coalition parties. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2), 333–349. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: Explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics, 40(4), 821–847. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1287448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar