Who Represents the Poor? The Corrective Potential of Populism in Spain

References

• Alonso, S. (2012). Challenging the State: Devolution and the battle for partisan credibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, S., Gómez, B., & Cabeza, L. (2013). Measuring centre–periphery preferences: The Regional Manifestos Project. Regional & Federal Studies, 23(2), 189–211. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2012.754351
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., & Beramendi, P. (2012). Left parties, poor voters, and electoral participation in advanced industrial societies. Comparative Political Studies, 45(6), 714–746. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. doi: 10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., & Däubler, T. (2014). Putting text in context: How to estimate better left-right positions by scaling party Manifesto data using item response theory. ‘Mapping policy preferences from texts’ conference, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Bornschier, S. (2017). Populist mobilization across time and space: An introduction. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 301–312. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Party competition: Selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In H. Daalder, & P. Mair (Eds.), Western European party systems (pp. 267–271). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44(2), 99–110. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079573
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2015). Manifesto discourse and the substantive representation of ethnic minorities: Analysis of UK state-wide and meso elections, 1964–2011. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1), 154–181. doi: 10.1093/pa/gst010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciudadanos Castilla y León. (2015). Castilla y León pide cambio. Programa elecciones autonómicas 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EAPN. (2018). State of poverty. Follow up on the indicator on poverty and social exclusion 2008-2017 (8th Report). Retrieved from https://www.eapn.es/estadodepobreza/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• Elsässer, L., Hense, S., & Schäfer, A. (2017). ‘Dem Deutschen Volke’? Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 27(2), 161–180. doi: 10.1007/s41358-017-0097-9
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Albertos, J., & Manzano, D. (2012). The lack of partisan conflict over the welfare state in Spain. South European Society and Politics, 17(3), 427–447. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2012.701895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, B., & Trujillo, M. (2011). Los excluidos también pueden votar: abstención y exclusión social en España. Documento de trabajo 169. Madrid: Fundación Alternativas.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 203–224. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159–1185. doi: 10.1177/0010414015575030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, A., Kevins, A., Jensen, C., & Van Kersbergen, K. (2017). Research note: Peeping at the corpus – What is really going on behind the equality and welfare items of the Manifesto Project? Journal of European Social Policy, 27(5), 403–416. doi: 10.1177/0958928716688263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Ruth, S. P. (2017). Mind the gap! Populism, participation and representation in Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 462–484. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusko, K. L. (2008). The political representation of the poor (Dissertation University of Michigan).
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.572619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leonisio, R., & Scantamburlo, M. (2019). La competición política en el País Vasco, 1980–2016. El equilibrio entre la dimensión económica y la nacionalista. In B. Gómez, S. Alonso, & L. Cabeza (Eds.), En busca del poder territorial. Cuatro décadas de elecciones autonómicas en España (pp. 255–279). Madrid: CiS.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, H., Plaza-Colodro, C., & Freyburg, T. (2019). Who votes for new parties? Economic voting, political ideology and populist attitudes, West European Politics (early view).
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. (2008). Party competition between unequals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. doi: 10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podemos Castilla y León. (2015). Medidas para el cambio en Castilla y León. Programa elecciones autonómicas 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson, J., & Rueda, D. (2010). The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies, 43(6), 675–705. doi: 10.1177/0010414009358672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, D. (2012). Opposition parties and the urban poor in African democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 45(11), 1351–1378. doi: 10.1177/0010414012437166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, E., & Wright, G. D. (2013). Political parties and representation of the poor in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 552–565. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (1995). Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: The Peruvian case. World Politics, 48(1), 82–116. doi: 10.1353/wp.1995.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2016). Populism and political representation. In C. Lancaster, & N. van de Walle (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the politics of development (pp. 517–536). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, S. P., & Hawkins, K. (2017). Populism and democratic representation in Latin America. In R. Heinisch, O. Mazzoleni, & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Handbook on political populism (pp. 255–273). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2006). The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(3), 297–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
   Google Scholar
• Scantamburlo, M., Alonso, A., & Gómez, B. (2018). Democratic regeneration in European peripheral regions: New politics for the territory? West European Politics, 41(2), 615–639. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1403148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A. (2018). The poor representation of the poor. In J. Andersson, & O. Godechot (Eds.), Destabilizing orders – Understanding the consequences of neoliberalism (pp. 86–89). Paris: MaxPo Discussion Paper 18/1.
   Google Scholar
• Sola, J., & Rendueles, C. (2018). Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), 99–116. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2017.1304899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vampa, D. (2016). The regional politics of welfare in Italy, Spain and Great Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar