Populist Radical Right Party-Voter Policy Representation in Western Europe

References

• Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2005). Anti-immigration parties and the defence of liberal values: The exceptional case of the List Pim Fortuyn. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(3), 337–354.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2015). Gender and the radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis of policy agendas. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Art, D. (2011). Inside the radical right: The development of anti-immigrant parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K. (2008). Protest, neo-liberalism or anti-immigrant sentiment: What motivates the voters of the extreme right in Western Europe? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 2(2), 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K. (2015). The AfD: Finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany? West European Politics, 38(3), 535–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, K., & Carter, E. (2006). Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 419–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1S), 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., Jolly, S., & Polk, J. (2012). Complexity in the European party space: exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics, 13(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, T., Green-Pedersen, C., Krouwel, A., Luther, K. R., & Sitter, N. (2009). If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies, 58(3), 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berbuir, N., Lewandowsky, M., & Siri, J. (2015). The AfD and its sympathisers: Finally a right-wing populist movement in Germany? German Politics, 24(2), 154–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, H.-G., & Meret, S. (2009). Revisiting Lepanto: The political mobilization against Islam in contemporary Western Europe. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3–4), 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Bodet, M. A. (2006). Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers? Comparative Political Studies, 39(10), 1243–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenau, J., Eggers, A. C., Hangartner, D., & Hix, S. (2017). Open/closed list and party choice: Experimental evidence from the UK. British Journal of Political Science, 47(04), 809–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I. (2000). Expert judgements of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research. European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 103–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(01), 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. (2005). The extreme right in Western Europe: Success or failure?. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, S., de Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2017). How people organise cultural attitudes: Cultural belief systems and the populist radical right. West European Politics, 40(4), 791–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., & Sundell, A. (2012). A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 353–363. Special Symposium: Generational Differences in Electoral Behaviour.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koster, W., Achterberg, P., Van der Waal, J., Van Bohemen, S., & Kemmers, R. (2014). Progressiveness and the new right: The electoral relevance of culturally progressive values in the Netherlands. West European Politics, 37(3), 584–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, S. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, S., & Mügge, L. (2015). Gender and right-wing populism in the low countries: Ideological variations across parties and time. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison, J., & Goodwin, M. (2015). Immigration, issue ownership and the rise of UKIP. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(suppl. 1), 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, W. M. (2002). How effective is the cordon sanitaire? Lessons from efforts to contain the far right in Belgium, France, Denmark, and Norway. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung, 4(1), 32–51.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, R. M., May, J., & Armstrong, D. A. (2010). Coalition-directed voting in multiparty democracies. American Political Science Review, 104(04), 698–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eatwell, R. (1998). The dynamics of right-wing electoral breakthrough. Patterns of Prejudice, 32(3), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eatwell, R. (2003). Ten theories of the extreme right. In P. Merkl & L. Weinberg (Eds.), Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century (pp. 45–70). London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Eeckhout, B., & Paternotte, D. (2011). A paradise for LGBT rights? The paradox of Belgium. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(8), 1058–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. (2014). Round 7, data file edition 2.1. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Mellon, J. (2019). Immigration, Euroscepticism, and the rise and fall of UKIP. Party Politics, 25(1), 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., De Vries, C., Steenbergen, M., & Edwards, E. (2011). Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters? Party Politics, 17(3), 275–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giger, N., & Lefkofridi, Z. (2014). Salience-based congruence between parties & their voters: The Swiss case. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(2), 287–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 687–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J. D., & Powell, G. B. (1994). Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics, 46(3), 291–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Ruth, S. P. (2017). Mind the gap! Populism, participation and representation in Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 462–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2017). On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivaldi, G. (2016). A new course for the French radical right? The Front National and ‘de-demonisation’. In T. Akkerman, S. De Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe (pp. 225–246). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, E. (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungar, A.-C. (2016). From the mainstream to the margin? The radicalisation of the True Finns. In T. Akkerman, S. De Lange, & M. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right in Western Europe. Into the mainstream? (pp. 113–143). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jungar, A.-C., & Edenborg, E. (2018, July 23). Homonationalism in the nordic region: PRR Parties and LGBTQ rights. Paper presented at the XXV IPSA World Congress, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Jungar, A.-C., & Jupskås, A. R. (2014). Populist radical right parties in the nordic region: A new and distinct party family? Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 215–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancing in parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99(02), 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (1997). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. (2012). Social class and the radical right: Conceptualizing political preference formation and partisan choice. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Class politics and the radical right (pp. 224–251). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2011, June 16–18). Party alignments: Change and continuity. Paper presented at the Conference on ‘The Future of Democratic Capitalism', University of Zurich, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen–politician linkages: An introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies (pp. 1–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laible, J. (2008). Europeanizing the nationalist agenda: Vlaams belang. In Separatism and sovereignty in the new Europe (pp. 121–148). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z., & Casado-Asensio, J. (2013). European vox radicis: Representation and policy congruence on the extremes. Comparative European Politics, 11(1), 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z., Wagner, M., & Willmann, J. E. (2013). Left-authoritarians and policy representation in Western Europe: Electoral choice across ideological dimensions. West European Politics, 37(1), 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. MPIfG Working Paper 09/8. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M., & Bakker, R. (2007). Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2000). The renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition, 35(02), 170–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2002). The new radical right in the political process: Interaction effects in France and Germany. In M. Schain, A. Zolberg, & P. Hossay (Eds.), Shadows over Europe: The development and impact of the extreme right in Western Europe (pp. 245–268). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2013). From pariah to policy-maker? The radical right in Europe, west and east: Between margin and mainstream. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(1), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, M. (2015). Profiles, patterns, process: Studying the east European radical right in its political environment. In M. Minkenberg (Ed.), Transforming the transformation? The east European radical right in the political process (pp. 27–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (1999). The single-issue party thesis: Extreme right parties and the immigration issue. West European Politics, 22(3), 182–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2010). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odmalm, P., & Hepburn, E. (2017). The European mainstream and the populist radical right. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2015). Populists in parliament: Comparing left-wing and right-wing populism in the Netherlands. Political Studies, 63(1), 60–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., … Zilovic, M. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey data. Research & Politics, 4(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteat, V. P., & Mereish, E. H. (2012). Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations: Sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology, 33(2), 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 273–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. (2009). The ideological congruence controversy: The impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1475–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, G. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. The American Political Science Review, 83(1), 93–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review, 5(01), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedin, D., & Morales, L. (2012, September 7). Obtaining party positions on immigration from party manifestos. Paper presented at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) Conference, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, R. (2017). The ‘alternative für deutschland in the electorate’: Between single-issue and right-wing populist party. German Politics, 26(1), 124–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S., & Popa, S. (2015a). Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, 16(3), 347–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., Popa, S., Hobolt, S., & Teperoglou, E. (2015b). European Parliament election study 2014, voter study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (2007). A balance sheet of the vices and virtues of ‘populisms’. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences, 02, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. (1994). Empirical research into political representation: Failing democracy or failing models? In K. M. Jennings & T. E. Mann (Eds.), Elections at home and abroad (pp. 237–264). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. (2012). The blind corner of political representation. Representation, 48(1), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J., & Schmitt, H. (1997). Policy representation. European Journal of Political Research, 32, 165–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2000). Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, W., & Van Spanje, J. (2009). Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C. (2001). Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales. Quality and Quantity, 35(3), 325–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. N. (1991). European community politics and electoral representation: Evidence from the 1989 European elections study. European Journal of Political Research, 19(1), 105–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hecke, S., Bursens, P., Wolfs, W., & Jadot, C. (2012, September 13–15). A tale of two cities? The limited impact of Europe on Belgian political parties. Paper presented at the Sixth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, University of Tampere, Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• van Kessel, S. (2013). A matter of supply and demand: The electoral performance of populist parties in three European countries. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 175–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious parties anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Mertz, N., Regel, S., & Werner, A. (2013). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR): Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Retrieved from manifesto-project.wzb.eu
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. (1999). System characteristics matter: Empirical evidence from ten representation studies. In W. E. Miller (Ed.), Policy representation in Western democracies (pp. 137–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhirkov, K. (2014). Nativist but not alienated: A comparative perspective on the radical right vote in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(2), 286–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar