Intra-Party Democracy and Party Unity: Varied Rules, Varied Consequences

References

• Aylott, N., & Bolin, N. (2017). Managed intra-party democracy: Pre-cursory delegation and party leadership selection. Party Politics, 23(1), 55–65. doi: 10.1177/1354068816655569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. (2007). Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 363–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.101608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (2011). Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bøggild, T., & Pedersen, H. H. (2018). Campaigning on behalf of the party? Party constraints on candidate campaign personalization. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 883–899. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M., & Katz, R. S. (1999). Party cohesion, party discipline, and parliaments. In S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, & R. S. Katz (Eds.), Party discipline and parliamentary government (pp. 3–22). Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buell Jr., E. H. (1986). Divisive primaries and participation in fall presidential campaigns: A study of the 1984 New Hampshire primary activists. American Politics Quarterly, 14(4), 376–90. doi: 10.1177/1532673X8601400406
   Google Scholar
• Close, C., & Gherghina, S. (2019). Rethinking intra-party cohesion: Towards a conceptual and analytical framework. Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:1354068819836044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close, C., Gherghina, S., & Sierens, V. (2019). Prompting legislative agreement and loyalty: What role for intra-party democracy? Parliamentary Affairs, 72(2), 387–405. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, E. E. (2015). Institutions and vote unity in parliaments: Evidence from 33 national chambers. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(3), 360–389. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2015.1040246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., & Coller, X. (2015). Cohesion and candidate selection in parliamentary groups. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(3), 592–615. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsu008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., & Blais, A. (2012). Politics at the centre: The selection and removal of party leaders in the Anglo parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., & Gauja, A. (2019). Selecting party leaders, reform processes and methods: Examining the Australian and New Zealand Labour parties. International Political Science Review. Advance online publication. doi:0192512119888295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., Kenig, O., Rahaṭ, G., & Pruysers, S. (2016). The promise and challenge of party primary elections: A comparative perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W. P., & Pruysers, S. (2019). Sore losers? The costs of intra-party democracy. Party Politics, 25(4), 483–94. doi: 10.1177/1354068817728216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., & Weldon, S. (2007). Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Party Politics, 13(2), 179–196. doi: 10.1177/1354068807073856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca, M., & Venturino, F. (2017). The effects of primaries on electoral performance: France and Italy in comparative perspective. French Politics, 15(1), 43–56. doi: 10.1057/s41253-016-0007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2008). Legislative party discipline and cohesion in comparative perspective. In D. Giannetti & K. Benoit (Eds.), Intra-party politics and coalition governments (pp. 119–136). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Schumacher, G. (2015). Why some leaders die hard (and others don’t): party goals, party institutions, and how they interact. In W. P. Cross & J.-B. Pilet (Eds.), The politics of party leadership (pp. 90–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K., Kenney, P., Wintersieck, A., & Carle, J. (2017). The upside of the long campaign: How presidential elections engage the electorate. American Politics Research, 45(2), 186–223. doi: 10.1177/1532673X16677278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Z., & Haber, M. (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37, 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. (2014). Candidate selection: Implications and challenges for legislative behavior. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. Strom (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 90–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R., & Rahat, G. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytic framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Hillygus, D. S., & Tompson, T. (2010). “Sour grapes” or rational voting? Voter decision making among thwarted primary voters in 2008. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(3), 499–529. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, G. (2018). Knesset bans campaign contributions for primaries, Jerusalam Post on-line edition. January 2. https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Knesset-bans-campaign-contributions-for-primaries-522658 accessed 3/6/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hofnung, M. (2008). Unaccounted competition: The finance of intra-party elections. Party Politics, 14(6), 726–744. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortala-Vallve, R., & Mueller, H. (2015). Primaries: The unifying force. Public Choice, 163(3-4), 289–305. doi: 10.1007/s11127-015-0249-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indriðason, I. H., & Kristinsson, G. H. (2015). Primary consequences: The effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics, 21(4), 565–576. doi: 10.1177/1354068813487117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzkovitch-Malka, R., & Hazan, R. H. (2017). Unpacking party unity: The combined effects of electoral systems and candidate selection methods on legislative attitudes and behavioural norms. Political Studies, 65(2), 452–474. doi: 10.1177/0032321716634094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. (2014). No man can serve two masters: Party politicians, party members, citizens and principal–agent models of democracy. Party Politics, 20(2), 183–193. doi: 10.1177/1354068813519967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. (2009). Classifying party leaders’ selection methods in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19(4), 433–47. doi: 10.1080/17457280903275261
   Google Scholar
• Kenig, O., & Atmor, N. (2019). Candidate spending and success in Israel’s party primaries: How far does money go? Party Politics. Advance online publication. doi:1354068819833348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O., Cross, W., Pruysers, S., & Rahat, G. (2015). Party primaries: Towards a definition and typology. Representation, 51(2), 147–60. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2015.1061044
   Google Scholar
• Kenig, O., & Pruysers, S. (2018). The challenges of inclusive intra-party selection methods. In G. Cordero, & X. Coller (Eds.), Democratizing candidate selection (pp. 25–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kerevel, Y. P. (2017). The costs and benefits of party switching in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(1), 28–51. doi: 10.1111/laps.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernell, G. (2015). Party nomination rules and campaign participation. Comparative Political Studies, 48(13), 1814–1843. doi: 10.1177/0010414015574876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R. (2012). Intra-party democracy and party responsiveness. West European Politics, 35(6), 1295–1319. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Ezrow, L., Ward, H., & Böhmelt, T. (2017). Intraparty democracy and responsiveness to rival parties’ policies. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 1026–1044. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGiollabhui, S. (2018). Battleground: Candidate selection and violence in Africa’s dominant political parties. Democratization, 25(6), 978–995. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1451841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In R. S. Katz & W. J. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 204–27). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D. Z., & Shomer, Y. (2013). A cross-national analysis of party switching. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(1), 111–141. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. H., & Schumacher, G. (2015). Do leadership changes improve electoral performance? In W. P. Cross & J.-B. Pilet (Eds.), The politics of party leadership (pp. 149–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S. E., Webb, P. D., Allern, E. H., Aylott, N., Van Biezen, I., … Enyedi, Z. (2016). Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies: How parties organise in the 21st century. Party Politics, 22(6), 661–678. doi: 10.1177/1354068816662493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T., Scarrow, S. E., & Webb, P. D. (2018). Political party database round 1b.1 & political party database version 1a.3, harvard dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LCZTAN.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, J., & Kölln, A.-K. (2018). Electoral infidelity: Why party members cast defecting votes. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 539–560. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruysers, S., Cross, W. P., Gauja, A., & Rahat, G. (2017). The impact of parties on women’s representation. In S. E. Scarrow, T. Poguntke, & P. D. Webb (Eds.), Organizing political parties: Representation, participation, and power (pp. 208–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, B., & Seeberg, M. B. (2018). Fighting your friends? A study of intra-party violence in sub-Saharan Africa. Democratization, 25, 1033–1051. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2018.1441291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri, G., Seddone, A., & Venturino, F. (Eds.). (2015). Party primaries in comparative perspective. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E. (2015). Beyond party members. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shomer, Y. (2017). The conditional effect of electoral systems and intraparty candidate selection processes on parties’ behavior. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 63–96. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shomer, Y., Put, G.-J., & Gedalya-Lavy, E. (2016). Intra-party politics and public opinion: How candidate selection processes affect citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. Political Behavior, 38(3), 509–534. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9324-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich. (2006). Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(2), 150–178. doi: 10.1080/13572330600739413
   Google Scholar
• So, F. (2020). Don't air your dirty laundry: Party leadership contests and parliamentary election outcomes. European Journal of Political Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, P. L. (1986). The politics of disgruntlement: Nonvoting and defections among supporters of nomination losers, 1968-1984. Political Behavior, 8(1), 81–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00987593
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, P. L. (2010). The effect of nomination divisiveness on the 2008 presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43(2), 255–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, D. C., & Kaiser, A. (2014). Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics, 20(4), 576–590. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeleene, A., & Sandri, G. (2019). The more, the smoother? Candidate selection and intraparty competition. In A. Vandeleene, L. de Winter, & P. Baudewyns (Eds.), Candidates, parties and voters in the Belgian partitocracy (pp. 77–103). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vonno, C. M. C., Malka, R. I., Depauw, S., Hazan, R. Y., & Andeweg, R. B. (2014). Agreement, loyalty and discipline: A sequential approach to party unity. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Eds.), Representing the People: A Survey among members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments (pp. 110–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Nostitz, F.-C., & Sandri, G. (2018). State funding and party primaries. In J. Mendilow & E. Phélippeau (Eds.), Handbook of political party funding (pp. 203–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J., & Bale, T. (2019). Populism as an intra-party phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1), 99–115. doi: 10.1177/1369148118806115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. D., Scarrow, S. E., & Poguntke, T. (2019). Party organization and satisfaction with democracy: Inside the blackbox of linkage. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17457289.2019.1698047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. (1962). On the superiority of national conventions. The Review of Politics, 24(3), 307–319. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500010470
   Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F. (2019). Party reforms and electoral systems: Proportional representation is more hospitable to internal democratisation. Representation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1652204.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., Jungherr, A., & Schoen, H. (2019). More than opinion expression: Secondary effects of intraparty referendums on party members. Party Politics, 25(6), 817–827. doi: 10.1177/1354068817745729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar