Electoral Reform & Strategic Voting in Chilean Legislative Elections

References

• Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Blais, A., Diamond, M., Diskin, A., Indridason, I. H., …Levine, R. (2009). Comparing strategic voting under FPTP and PR. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 61–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Blais, A., Lee, D., & Levine, R. (2008). Coalition considerations and the vote. In Elections in Israel. New Brusnwick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M., Boehmke, F. J., & Nagler, J. (2006). Strategic voting in British elections. Electoral Studies, 25(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach for modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R., & Yaish, M. (2003). Social cleavages, electoral reform and party choice: Israel's 'natural' experiment. Electoral Studies, 22(3), 399–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, N. A. M., Andrade, J. S., & Herrmann, H. J. (2010). Tactical voting in plurality elections. PLoS ONE, 5(9), 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargsted, M. A., & Kedar, O. (2009). Coalition-targeted duvergerian voting: How expectations affect voter choice under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. (2002). Why is there so little strategic voting in canadian plurality rule elections? Political Studies, 50(3), 445–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Dostie-Goulet, E., & Bodet, M. A.. (2009). Voting strategically in Canada and Britain. In B. Grofman, A. Blais, & S. Bowler (Eds.), Duverger's law of plurality voting (pp. 13–25). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Nadeau, R. (1996). Measuring strategic voting: A two-step procedure. Electoral Studies, 15(1), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2001). Measuring strategic voting in multiparty plurality elections. Electoral Studies, 20(3), 343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Turgeon, M. (2004). How good are voters at sorting out the weakest candidate in their constituency? Electoral Studies, 23(3), 455–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad, J., Dinas, E., & Riera, P. (2013). Tactical voting and party preferences: A test of cognitive dissonance theory. Political Behavior, 35(3), 429–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Karp, J. A., & Donovan, T. (2010). Strategic coalition voting: Evidence from New Zealand. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 350–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (2009). Ingeniería electoral: ¿Qué nos muestran las investigaciones académicas sobre los efectos anticipados de las reformas electorales? In A. Fontaine, C. Larroulet, J. Navarrete, & I. Walker (Eds.), Reforma del sistema electoral chileno (pp. 233–244). Santiago, Chile: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. (2006). Las virtudes del sistema binominal. Revista de ciencia politica, 26(1), 226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. (2015). Chile's electoral reform.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. (2016). Malapportionment and ideological bias in Chilean electoral districts. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(3), 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Hix, S. (2013, February). Policy consequences of electoral rules. American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Siavelis, P. M. (2005). Insurance for good losers and the survival of Chile's concertación. Latin American Politics and Society, 47(2), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaramonte, A., & D'Alimonte, R. (2018). The new Italian electoral system and its effects on strategic coordination and disproportionality. Italian Political Science, 13(1), 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chile Library of National Congress. (1990). Organic constitutional law on popular elections and vote counting.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems (Vol. 7). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & Shugart, M. S. (1996). Strategic voting under proportional representation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 12(2), 299–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSES. (2015). The comparative study of electoral systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 2 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module2.2015-12-15.
   Google Scholar
• CSES. (2009). The comparative study of electoral systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15.
   Google Scholar
• CSES. (2017). The comparative study of electoral systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 5 THIRD ADVANCE RELEASE [dataset and documentation]. July 20, 2021 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module5.2021-07-20.
   Google Scholar
• Droop, H. R. (1881). On methods of electing representatives. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 44(2), 141–202.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. (1951). Les partis politiques. Paris, France: Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. (2000). Case study and theory in political science. In Case study method (1st ed., pp. 119–164). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Heath, A. (1993). A tactical error in the analysis of tactical voting: A response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin. British Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. (2001). Extending the rational voter theory of tactical voting. Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends, 94, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. (2004). Definition and measurement of tactical voting: The role of rational choice. British Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 152–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M., Niemi, R., & Whitten, G. (1994). The two faces of tactical voting. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 549–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. W., & Rae, N. C. (1989). A test of the importance of tactical voting: Great Britain, 1987. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamboa, R., & Morales, M. (2016). Chile's 2015 electoral reform: Changing the rules of the game. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(4), 126–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannetti, D., & Grofman, B. (2011). A natural experiment on electoral law reform: Evaluating the long run consequences of 1990s electoral reform in Italy and Japan. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T. (2007). Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 46(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T. (2009). District magnitude and the comparative study of strategic voting. In H.-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral system (pp. 289–310). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T., & Stoiber, M. (2012, May). Strategic voting in proportional systems: The case of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, R. (1989). Electoral laws, party systems, and elites: The case of Spain. The American Political Science Reveiw, 83(3), 835–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, I. D. (2020). Abandon ship? An analysis of strategic voting among liberal democrat voters in the 2015 UK election. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(3), 503–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A., & Evans, G. (1994). Tactical voting: Concepts, measurement and findings. British Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 557–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J., & Long, J. (2016). Strategic voting, information, and ethnicity in emerging democracies: Evidence from Kenya. Electoral Studies, 44, 351–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., & Pattie, C. (1991). Tactical voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: An alternative approach. British Journal of Political Science, 21(1), 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D. R. (2013). The ecology of tactical voting in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23(1), 86–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Fording, R. (2001). Does tactical voting matter? The political impact of tactical voting in recent British elections. Comparative Political Studies, 34(3), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). “Effective” number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londregan, J. B. (2000). Legislative institutions and ideology in Chile. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meffert, M. F., & Gschwend, T. (2011). Polls, coalition signals and strategic voting: An experimental investigation of perceptions and effects. European Journal of Political Research, 50(5), 636–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moke, M. (2006). Political advertising in Chile. In L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The SAGE book of political advertising (pp. 145–159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., Whitten, G., & Franklin, M. (1992). Constituency characteristics, individual characteristics and tactical voting in the 1987 British general election. The Britsh Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPALC (2009). Chili: Système électoral.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. R. (1999). Strategic voting in the 1996 Japanese general election. Comparative Political Studies, 32(2), 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera, P. (2020). Voting after the change: A natural experiment on the effect of electoral reform on party system fragmentation. International Political Science Review, 41(2), 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajuria, J. (2017). Chile just went to the polls – and transformed its legislature.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1968). Political development and political engineering. Public Policy, 17, 261–298.
   Google Scholar
• Shikano, S., Herrmann, M., & Thurner, P. W. (2009). Strategic voting under proportional representation: Threshold insurance in German elections. West European Politics, 32(3), 634–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., & Taagepera, R. (2017). Votes from seats: Logical models of electoral systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. (2005). Chile: The unexpected (and expected) consequences of electoral engineering. In M. Gallagher & P. Mitchell (Eds.), The politics of electoral systems (pp. 433–452). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (2010). President and congress in postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional constraints to democratic consolidation (1st ed). University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taagepera, R. (2007). Predicting party sizes: The logic of simple electoral systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1986). A general model of tactical and inverse tactical voting. British Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 395–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, A., & Siavelis, P. (1991). Ley electoral y estabilidad democrática: Un ejercicio de simulación para el caso de Chile. Estudios Públicos, 43, 27–87.
   Google Scholar
• Van Holsteyn, J. J., & Irwin, G. A. (2003). Never a dull moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch parliamentary election of 2002. West European Politics, 26(2), 41–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar