Collective Mandates in Brazil: Democratic Innovations to Boost Participation in Legislature

References

• Almeida, D. R. (2019). The constructivist turn in political representation and its challenges to democratic legitimacy: Lessons from participatory institutions in Brazil. Representation, 55(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2018.1551241
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R. B., & Thomassen, J. J. A. (2005). Modes of political representation: Toward a new typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. (2000). Teoria democrática e deliberação pública. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, 50(50), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452000000200003
   Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2012). Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? New Media & Society, 14(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811413191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, C. V. (2021). Candidaturas Coletivas nas Eleições Municipais do Brasil: Estratégia de campanha e razões para adoção. Curso de Administração Pública da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina [Bachelor’s degree monograph]. UDESC.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., Glazer, A., & Hammond, T. H. (2001). Theories of delegation. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 235–269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błesznowski, B. (2012). In defence of the political the crisis of democracy and the return of the people from the perspective of Foucault and Rancière. Polish Sociological Review, 179(3), 331–348. https://polish-sociological-review.eu/In-Defence-of-the-Political-nThe-Crisis-of-Democracy-and-the-Return-of-the-People,125709,0,2.html
   Google Scholar
• Blum, C., & Zuber, C. I. (2016). Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunkett, D. (2012). Politics as theory and politics as practice. The Political Quarterly, 83(4), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, A. (2015). Midlife crisis? Spanish democracy at 40. Juncture, 22(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00839.x
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, C. E., & Nelson-Núñez, J. (2014). Civil society and support for the political system in times of crisis. Latin American Research Review, 49(1), 128–154. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43670156. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2014.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Câmara Federal. (2022). A nova composição da Câmara: deputados eleitos em 2022. https://www.camara.leg.br/internet/agencia/infograficos-html5/composicao-da-camara-2023/index.html, access on November, 4 2022
   Google Scholar
• Campos, B. L. (2021). Juntas em um único número de urna? Uma análise das experiências de mandato coletivo no Brasil (2016-2020) [PhD dissertation]. Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Política, Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, E. (2012). The Indignados of Spain: A precedent to occupy wall street. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.708830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro, R. A. (2019). Democracia e inovação: Análise de propostas de mandatos compartilhados no início do século XXI. Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração [PhD dissertation]. UDESC.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2015). From crisis to crisis: Democracy, crisis and the occupy movement. Political Studies Review, 13(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E., & Pierce, R. (1986). Political representation in France. Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, W. Q., Secchi, L., & Cavalheiro, R. A. (2021). A relação entre estado e políticas públicas: Uma análise teórica sobre o caso brasileiro. Revista Debates, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.72132
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, C., & Harris, J. (2013). Globalization and the crisis of democracy. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 12, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341250
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1959). An economic theory of democracy. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Eulau, H., Wahlke, J. C., Buchanan, W., & Ferguson, L. C. (1959). The role of the representative: Some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund Burke. American Political Science Review, 53(3), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folha. (2022). Candidaturas coletivas 2018–2022. Retrieved October 24, 2022, from https://noticias.uol.com.br/eleicoes/2022/apuracao/1turno/
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4096571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking about empowered participatory governance. In A. Fung, & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance (pp. 3–42). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. C., & Secchi, L. (2015). Public administration in Brazil: Structure, reforms, and participation. In The international handbook of public administration and governance. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781954492.00017
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (2012). How can deliberative democracy get a grip? The Political Quarterly, 83(4), 806–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. (2020). Democratic frustration: Concept, dimensions and behavioural consequences. Societies, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. (2019). Democratic innovation beyond deliberative reflection: The plebiscitary rebound and the advent of action-oriented democracy. Democratization, 26(3), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1547896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, J., & Scheele, C. E. (2014). Theoretical approaches to digital services and digital democracy: The merits of the contextual new medium theory model. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI368
   Google Scholar
• Högström, J. (2014). Democracies in crisis. Contemporary Politics, 20(4), 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2014.969122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INESC. (2022). Perfil do Poder Eleições 2022: #5 Candidaturas coletivas. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://www.inesc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Eleicoes-2022-Candidaturas-Coletivas.pdf?fbclid=PAAaZDtoyiafUJd6Vd5JvETQ9NZRugnkZ0bNluWZwXROIa8iac8lbGIr0U_PI
   Google Scholar
• IPU. (2022). Global parliamentary report 2022: Public engagement in the work of parliament. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.ipu.org/our-impact/strong-parliaments/setting-standards/global-parliamentary-report/global-parliamentary-report-2022-public-engagement-in-work-parliament
   Google Scholar
• King, L. A. (2003). Deliberation, legitimacy, and multilateral democracy. Governance, 16(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.t01-1-00203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. P. (1999). Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, G. P. (2019). Megafonizar as lutas: A experiência das Muitas e da Gabinetona em Belo Horizonte [Master’s thesis]. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, M. A. F., & Ribeiro, T. B. (2016). Para além da democracia representativa: uma crítica ao modelo tradicional de representatividade política nas democracias modernas. Revista Juridica, 2(39), 321–345.
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, D. J., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1979). The delegate theory of representation. American Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, R. F. (2016). Antes de Habermas, para além de Habermas: Uma abordagem pragmatista da democracia deliberativa. Sociedade e Estado, 31(3), 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69922016.00030009
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, R. F., Gelape, L. O., & Cruz, C. E. (2023). Collective candidacies and mandates in Brazil: Challenges and pitfalls of a gambiarra. In A. Bua, & S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming participatory governance: Social movements and the reinvention of democratic innovations (pp. 154–169). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, R. F., & Gurza Lavalle, A. (2019). Brazil, 40 years of struggles over political legitimacy through the lenses of representation. Representation, 55(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1679241
   Google Scholar
• Moss, G., & Coleman, S. (2014). Deliberative manoeuvres in the digital darkness: E-Democracy policy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(3), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau, J. M. (2012). Sistemas eleitorais (6th ed.). Editora da FGV.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donell, G. A. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. J., Putnam, R. D., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). A quarter-century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogrebinschi, T. (2022). Exploring worldwide democratic innovations – a regional case study of Latin America. European Democracy Hub. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://epd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/case-study-latin-america.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pogrebinschi, T., & Santos, F. (2011). Participação como representação: O impacto das conferências nacionais de políticas públicas no congresso nacional. Dados, 54(3), 259–305. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582011000300002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. (2017). International policy diffusion and participatory budgeting. Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43337-0.
   Google Scholar
• RAPS. (2019). Mandatos coletivos e compartilhados: desafios e possibilidades para a representação legislativa no século XXI. Retrieved March 7, 2023, from https://www.raps.org.br/2020/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/mandatos_v5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. (2009). Representation rethought: On trustees, delegates, and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, P. (2019). Political representation as collective representation. Considerations based on the Brazilian case. Representation, 55(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1594351
   Google Scholar
• Ronderos, S., Chicarino, T., & Segurado, R. (2022). Collectivizing political mandates: A discursive approach to the Brazilian Bancada Ativista’s campaign in the 2018 elections. Politics, 42(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721990276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, D. J. (1999). Incentives to cultivate a party vote in candidate-centric electoral systems: Evidence from Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 32(4), 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, L., & Leal, L. (Eds.). (2020). As candidaturas coletivas nas eleições municipais de 2020: análise descritiva e propostas para uma agenda de pesquisa sobre mandatos coletivos no Brasil. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4423739
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. (2017). Collusion in restraint of democracy: Against political deliberation. Daedalus, 146(3), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, W. Q. (2019). Mandatos coletivos e compartilhados: experimentações de inovações democráticas no poder legislativo no Brasil. Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração [Master’s degree thesis]. UDESC.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, C., & Scalia, V. (2020). Democracy on the five star movement’s Rousseau platform. European Politics and Society, 21(5), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1705564
   Google Scholar
• Subirats, J. (2011). Otra sociedade, otra política? De “no nos representan” a la democracia de lo común. Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J., & van Ham, C. (2017). A legitimacy crisis of representative democracy? In C. van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and reality of the legitimacy crisis: Explaining trends and cross-national differences in established democracies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793717.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• TSE. (2021). Resolução 23.675, de 16 de dezembro de 2021. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://www.tse.jus.br/legislacao/compilada/res/2021/resolucao-no-23-675-de-16-de-dezembro-de-2021
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, T. (2016). Democracia e participação. Inovações democráticas e trajetória participativa no Brasil. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 14(3), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395131003
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2008). A difusão do Orçamento Participativo brasileiro: “Boas práticas” devem ser promovidas? Opinião Pública, 14(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-62762008000100003
   Google Scholar
• Zucco, C., & Power, T. (2021). Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics, 53(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15941508069585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuquete, J. P. (2012). “This is what democracy looks like”: Is representation under siege? New Global Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1940-0004.1167
   Google Scholar