The Expanding Techniques of Progress: Agricultural Biotechnology and UN-REDD+

References

• Agrawal, A. and Redford, K. (2009) “Conservation and Displacement: An Overview,” Conservation and Society7: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Altieria, M. A. and Rosset, P. (1999) “Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World,” The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics2: 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, W. (2004) Deglobalization, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, W. (2009) Food Wars, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T. A., Alinon, K., Buhaug, H., et al., (2012) “Does Climate Change Drive Land-Use Conflicts in the Sahel?” Journal of Peace Research49: 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen, T. A. and Bryceson, I. (2012) “Conservation, Green-Blue Grabbing and Accumulation by Dispossession in Tanzania,” The Journal of Peasant Studies39: 335–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boas, H. (2011) No REDD Papers, Vol. 1,Portland: Eberhardt Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. E. (1995) “Economic Growth and the Limits of Environmental Regulation: A Social Economic Analysis,” Review of Social Economy53: 553–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockington, D. and Rosaleen, D. (2010) “Antipode Special Issue on Capitalism and Conservation,” Antipode42: 469–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caygill, H. (2000 [1995]) A Kant Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011) Stripping Our Lands of Forests and Gold: Mining, Deforestation, and Development Aggression. Official Publication of the Center for Environmental Concerns Philippines (CEC). Available at: www.cecphils.org/system/files/CEC%20Feedback2011_01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CHR & GJ (Center for Human Rights & Global Justice) (2011) Every Thirty Minutes: Farmer Suicides, Human Rights, and the Agrarian Crisis in India, New York: NYU School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, W. (2003) Acts of Rebellion: The Ward Churchill Reader, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E. (2012) “Problematizing REDD+ as an Experiment in Payment for Ecosystem Services,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability4: 612–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Schutter, O. (2011) “The Green Rush: The Global Race for Farmland and the Rights of Land Users,” Harvard International Law Journal52: 503–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devetter, F.-X. and Rousseau, S. (2011) “Working Hours and Sustainable Development,” Review of Social Economy69: 333–355.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr, T. F., Heskamp, A. B., Madison, I. B., et al., (2013) Missing the Poorest for the Trees? REDD+ and the Links Between Forestry, Resilience and Peace Building. London: Alert International, London School of Economics (LSE).
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. (2000) Killing for Conservation: Wildlife Policy in Zimbabwe, Bloomington: James Curry.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. (1980) “Power: An Institutional Framework of Analysis,” Journal of Economic Issues14: 897–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. (1988) “An Institutioanl Analysis of Corporate Power,” Journal of Economic Issues22: 79–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. (1989) Corporate Hegemony, Westport: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. (2011) “Book Review: Green Economics: Confronting the Ecological Crisis,” Journal of Economic Issues45: 1020–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. (2014a) “Power: Foucault, Dugger, and Social War,” in: B.COLLECTIVE (ed) The BASTARD Chronicles: Social War etc, Berkeley, CA: Ardent Press, pp. 52–105.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, A. (2014b) “Permanent War: Grids, Boomerangs, and Counterinsurgency,” Anarchist Studies22: 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, F. (2005) “Public Relations as Structuration: Prescriptive Critique of the StarLink Global Food Contamination Case,” Journal of Public Relations Research17: 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2012 [1995]) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiechter, A. (2000) History of Modern Biotechnology I, Berlin: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2012) “Capitalizing on Chaos: Climate Change and Disaster Capitalism,” Ephemera12: 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003 [1997]) “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the College De France 1975–1976, New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007 [2004]) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France 1977–1978, New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• FPP (2012) “Update on Recent UN-REDD Social and Environmental Principles and Criteria (SEPC) and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) Workshops,” Available at: http://www.forestpeoples.org/topics/un-redd/news/2012/02/update-recent-un-redd-social-and-environmental-principles-and-criteria-s.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. (2007 [1967]) The New Industrial State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GFC (Global Forest Coalition) (2010) Getting to the Roots: Underlying Causes of Deforestationand Forest Degradation, and Drivers of Forest Restoration. Available at: http://www.globalforestcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Report-Getting-to-the-roots1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gurian-Sherman, D. (2009) Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops, Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel, R. (2011) Green Economics: Confronting the Ecological Crisis, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, R. K. (1995) “Centralization, Resource Depletion, and Coercive Conservation Among the Tyua of the Northeastern Kalahari,” Human Ecology23: 169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISD (2009) “The REDD Negotiations: Moving into Copenhagen,” Available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/redd_negotiations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1978) Towards a History of Needs, New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kende, I. (1989) “The History of Peace: Concept and Organization from the Late Middle Ages to the 1870s,” Journal of Peace Research26: 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbrell, A. (1996) “The Patenting of Life and the Global Market in Body Parts,” in J.Mander and E.Goldsmith (eds) The Case Against the Global Economy and For a Turn Toward the Local, Berkeley: Sierra Club Books, pp. 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. (2010) “Sustainble Mining,” Dialectical Antrhopology34: 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. and Burrows, B. (1996) “Biotechnology to the Rescue? Twelve Reasons Why Biotechnology is Incompatible with Sustainble Agriculture,” The Ecologist26: 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, K., Winthal, E. and Olander, L. (2010) “Institutions and Policies to Protect Rural Livelihoods in REDD+ Regimes,” Global Environmental Politics10: 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K. (2006) Veblen in Plain English: A Complete Introduction to Thorstein Veblen's Economics, New York: Cambria.
   Google Scholar
• McCullum, C., Benbrook, C., Knowles, L., et al., (2003) “Appliction of Modern Biotechnology to Food and Agriculture: Food Systems Perspective,” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior35: 319–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlouglin, M. (1996) “Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important to the Developing World,” The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics2: 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, C. (1983) The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (2002 [1951]) White Collar: The American Middle Classes, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto-Corporation, “Monsanto Company Website”. Available at: http://www.monsanto.com.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. P. (2004) “Moral and Discursive Geographies in the War for Biodiversity in Africa,” Political Geography23: 813–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2009) “Bio-Hegemony: The Political Economy of Agricultural Biotechnology in Argentina,” Journal of Latin American Studies47: 27–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2010) “Democratising Biotechnology? Deliberation, Participation and Social Regulation in a Neo-Liberal World,” Review of International Studies36: 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. A. (2009) “Genetrically Modified Foods and the Attack on Nature,” Capitalism, Nature, Socialim23: 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ojeda, D. (2012) “Green Pretexts: Ecotourism, Neoliberal Conservation and Land Grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia,” The Journal of Peasant Studies39: 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, G. and Pechlaner, G. (2009) “Is Biotechnology the Answer? The Evidence from NAFTA,” NACLA: Report on the Americas42: 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, A., Videras, J. and Wu, S. (2010) “Identity and Environmentalism: The Influence of Community Characteristics,” Review of Social Economy68: 465–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. (1993) “Coercing Conservation? The Politics of State Resource Control,” Global Environmental Change3: 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. and Vandergeest, P. (2001) “Geneologies of Political Forests and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand,” The Journal of Asian Studies60: 761–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. and Vandergeest, P. (2011) “Political Ecologies of War and Forests: Counterinsurgencies and the Making of National Natures,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers101: 587–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, M. (2007) “Primitive Accumulation from Feudalism to Neoliberalism,” Capitalism, Nature, Socialim18: 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• REDD-Monitor (2011) “REDD: An Introduction,” Available at: http://www.redd-monitor.org/redd-an-introduction/.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. (2010) “Agency in International Climate Negotiations: The Case of Indigenous Peoples and Avoided Deforestation,” International Environmental Agreements10: 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. (1997) “The Idea of Progress,” in M.Rahnema and V.Bawtree (eds) The Post-Development Reader, London: Zed Books, pp. 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (2002 [1989]) Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development, London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. (2013) Making Peace with the Earth, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer, S. (2001) In Biotech We Trust? Having Faith in the Companies That Genetically Engineer Our Food, Available at: http://www.iatp.org/documents/in-biotech-we-trust-having-faith-in-the-companies-that-genetically-engineer-our-food.
   Google Scholar
• Staveren, Iv. (2009) “Communitarianism and the Market: A Paradox,” Review of Social Economy67: 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2009) “Green Capitalism, and the Cultural Poverty of Constructing Nature as Service Provider,” Radical Anthropology3: 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2010) “‘Ecosystem Service Commodities’—A New Imperial Ecology? Implications Foranimist Immanent Ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari,” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics69: 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2013a) “Banking Nature? The Spectacular Financialisation of Environmental Conservation,” Antipode45: 198–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2013b) “After the Green Rush? Biodiversity Offsets, Uranium Power and the ‘Calculus of Casualties’ in Greening Growth,” Human Geography6: 80–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tänzler, D. (2013) “Forest and Conflict: The Relevance of REDD+,” in M.Parker (ed) Backdraft: The Conflict Potential of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation, Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, pp. 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Trocchi, A. (2011) “For the Insurrection to Succeed, We Must First Destroy Ourselves,” in A.Vradis and D.Dalakoglou (eds) Revolt and Crisis in Greece: Between a Present Yet to Pass and a Future Still to Come, Oakland: AK Press, pp. 299–327.
   Google Scholar
• UN (2012a) “Measurement Reporting and Verification,” Available at: http://www.un-redd.org/UNREDDProgramme/InternationalSupport/MeasurementReportingandVerification/tabid/1050/language/en-US/Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• UN (2012b) “The United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries,” Available at: http://www.un-redd.org/Stakeholder_Engagement/History/tabid/55719/Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2009) “REDD Finance Mechanisms,” Available at: http://unfccc.int/files/methods_science/redd/application/pdf/tfdredd-finance-background-paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD (2011) “The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011–2015,” Available at: http://www.un-redd.org/PublicationsResources/tabid/587/Default.aspx#foundation_docs.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD (2012) “Climate Funds Update: The Latest Information on Climate Funds,” Available at: http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/listing/un-redd-programme.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1965 [1918]) The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men, New York: Sentry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1996 [1904]) The Theory of Business Enterprise, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (2009 [1899]) Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946) From Max Weber: Essay's in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ybarra, M. (2012) “Taming the Jungle, Saving the Maya Forest: Sedimented Counterinsurgency Practices in Contemporary Guatemalan Conservation,” The Journal of Peasant Studies39: 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerbe, N. (2007) “Contesting Privatization: NGOs and Farmers' Rights in the African Model Law,” Global Environmental Politics7: 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar