References
- Barendt, E. (2002). Freedom of speech (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Daly, P. (2021). Understanding administrative law in the common law world. Oxford University Press.
- Factually. (2020, May 13). Corrections and clarifications regarding falsehoods and misleading statements by Mr Thum Ping Tjin. https://www.gov.sg/article/corrections-and-clarifications-regarding-falsehoods-and-misleading-statements-by-mr-thum-ping-tjin
- Hickman, T. (2010). Public law after the human rights act. Bloomsbury.
- Lim, A. (2019, May 1). NMPs suggest 4 amendments to fake news Bill, including having independent council to review govt decisions. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/nmps-suggest-four-amendments-to-draft-fake-news-law-including-having-independent-council-to
- Marshall, M. (2021). The truth justification for freedom of speech. In A. Stone & F. Schauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of freedom of speech (pp. 44). Oxford University Press.
- Mill, J. S. (2015). On liberty, utilitarianism, and other essays. Oxford University Press.
- Nehal, H. S. (2021, September 28). Anti-foreign interference Bill - 3 areas of concern. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/anti-foreign-interference-bill-3-areas-of-concern
- Perera, L. (2021, October 4). Speech on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act (FICA). The Workers’ Party. https://www.wp.sg/foreign-interference-countermeasures-act-fica-speech-by-leon-perera/
- Post, R. (2011). Participatory democracy and free speech. Virginia Law Review, 97(3), 477–489. https://virginialawreview.org/articles/participatory-democracy-and-free-speech/
- Shanmugam, K. (2019, May 7). Second reading speech on the protection from online falsehoods and manipulation Bill. [Singapore Parliamentary Debates Official Report vol. 94]. Singapore Parliament.
- Shanmugam, K. (2021, October 4). Second reading speech on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Bill. [Singapore Parliamentary Debates Official Report vol. 95]. Singapore Parliament.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (1988, December 8). Chng Suan Tze v Minister for Home Affairs [1988] 2 SLR(R) 525.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2008, March 12). Kay Swee Pin v Singapore island country club [2008] 2 SLR(R) 802.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2009, October 7). Review Publishing Co Ltd v Lee Hsien Loong [2010] 1 SLR 52.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2015, November 25). Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General [2016] 1 SLR 779.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2017, January 16). Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng [2017] 1 SLR 373.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2019, May 27). Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v public prosecutor [2019] 2 SLR 216.
- Singapore Court of Appeal. (2021, October 8). The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General [2021] 2 SLR 1358.
- Singapore High Court. (1993, December 10). Chiam See Tong v Singapore Democratic Party [1993] 3 SLR(R) 774.
- Singapore High Court. (2015, December 17). Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2015] SGHC 320.
- Singapore High Court. (2020a, February 5) Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 25.
- Singapore High Court. (2020b, February 19) The Online Citizen v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 36.
- Singh, P. (2020, January 28). POFMA: A shield, not a sword. The Workers’ Party. https://www2.wp.sg/pofma-a-shield-not-a-sword-speech-by-pritam-singh/
- Singh, P. (2021, October 4). Speech on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act (FICA). The Workers’ Party. https://www.wp.sg/foreign-interference-countermeasures-act-fica-speech-by-lo-pritam-singh/
- Teo, M. (2021). A case for proportionality review in Singaporean constitutional adjudication. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 174–205. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2529340420
- Teo, M. (2022). Proportionality as Epistemic Independence. Public Law, 245–268. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/agispt.20220324064220
- Teo, M., & Kiu, Y. Y. (2021). Burden of proof and false statements of fact under the protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act 2019. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33, 760–776. https://journalsonline.academypublishing.org.sg/Journals/Singapore-Academy-of-Law-Journal/Current-Issue/ctl/eFirstSALPDFJournalView/mid/494/ArticleId/1627/Citation/JournalsOnlinePDF
- UK House of Lords. (1968, December 17) Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147.