The only way is up: proportions and portfolios for women in cabinet in Malaysia, 2008–2023

References

• Ahmad Zakuan, U. A. (2023). Challenges for women in political parties in Malaysia and acceleration strategies to leadership in politics. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. https://www.kas.de/en/web/malaysia/single-title/-/content/challenges-for-women-in-political-parties-in-malaysia
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, A. C. (2015). Big jumps in women’s presence in parliaments: Are these sufficient for improving beliefs in women’s ability to govern? Advancing Women in Leadership, 35, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v35.a122
   Google Scholar
• Annesley, C., Beckwith, K., & Franceschet, S. (2019). Cabinets, ministers, and gender. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2018). Women cabinet ministers in highly visible posts and empowerment of women: Are the two related? In A. C. Alexander, C. Bolzendahl, & F. Jalalzai, (Eds.), Measuring women’s political empowerment across the globe: Strategies, challenges, and future research (pp. 229–256). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Batista, M. (2017). Taking portfolios difference seriously: A composite measure based on policy, office, and budget in Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700010006
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, E., & Kenny, M. (2016). Comparing candidate selection: A feminist institutionalist approach. Government and Opposition, 51(3), 370–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, B. C. (1994). A woman’s place is in the house: Campaigning for congress in the feminist era. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar-Lemmon, M., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2009). Getting to the top: Career paths of women in Latin American cabinets. Political Research Quarterly, 62(4), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908322414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, D. (2019). Entering the men’s domain? Gender and portfolio allocation in European governments. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K. S. (2002). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage and profits (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höhmann, D. (2022). Political parties, issue salience, and the appointment of women cabinet members. European Political Science Review, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeber, C., & Hüffelmann, J. (2022). It’s a long way to the top: Women’s ministerial career paths. Politics and Gender, 18(3), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krook, M. L., & O’Brien, D. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., & Ben Hunt, W. (1992). Policy and party competition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1996). Making and Breaking Governments. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiquee, N. A. (Ed.). (2013). Public management and governance in Malaysia: Transformation and trends. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J. (2008). Privatization in Malaysia: Regulation, rent-seeking and policy failure. 2007. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
   Google Scholar
• Wan Azizah. (2002). Women in politics: Reflections from Malaysia. International IDEA. 191-202. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/women-in-parliament/perempuan-di-parlemen-bukan-sekedar-jumlah-EN-case-study-malaysia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, P. V., & Druckman, J. N. (2001). Portfolio salience and the proportionality of payoffs in coalition governments. British Journal of Political Science, 31(4), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000242
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, P. V., & Druckman, J. N. (2006). The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship. European Journal of Political Research, 45(4), 635–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washida, H. (2018). Distributive politics in Malaysia: Maintaining authoritarian party dominance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yeong, P. Y. (2018). How women matter: Gender representation in Malaysia’s 14th general election. The Round Table, 107(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2018.1545943
   Google Scholar