133
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of eight commercial on-site screening devices for drugs-of-abuse testing

Pages 325-331 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

REFERENCES

  • Buchan BJ, Walsh JM, Leaverton PE. Evaluation of the accuracy of on-site multi-analyte drug testing devices in the determination of the prevalence of illicit drugs in drivers. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 395–9.
  • Taylor EH, Oertli EH, Wolfgang JW, Mueller E. Accuracy of five on-site immunoassay drugs-of-abuse testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 1999; 23: 119–24.
  • Crouch DJ, Frank JF, Farrell LJ, Karsch HM, Klaunig JE. A multiple-site laboratory evaluation of three on-site urinanalysis drug-testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 1998; 22: 493–502.
  • Crouch DJ, Cheever ML, Andrenyak DM, Kunz DJ, Loughmiller DL. A Comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUPTh, AbuscreenONTRAK®, AbuscreenONLINE®, and GC/MS urinalysis test results. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 35–40.
  • Peace MR, Tarnai LD, Poklis A. Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine. J Anal Toxicol 2000; 24: 589–94.
  • Lillsunde P, Korte T. Comprehensive drug screening in urine using solid phase extraction and combined TLC and GC/MS identification. J Anal Toxicol 1991; 15: 71–81.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.