Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation Volume 79, 2019 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
514
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance of automated urine analyzers using flow cytometric and digital image-based technology in routine urinalysis

Canan KucukgerginDepartment of Biochemistry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-5889
ORCID Icon,
Evin AdemogluDepartment of Biochemistry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-3119
ORCID Icon,
Beyhan OmerDepartment of Biochemistry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-6281
ORCID Icon &
Sema GencDepartment of Biochemistry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2577-9263
ORCID Icon
Pages 468-474 | Received 19 Dec 2018, Accepted 19 Aug 2019, Published online: 28 Aug 2019

References

  • Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the IQ200 automated analyzer. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;358:167–174.
  • Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR, et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;301:1–18.
  • Bartolini L, Caldini A, Rapi S, et al. Urine sediment analysis: comparison between microscopic evaluation and fully automated flow cytometric analysis. Eur J Histochem. 1997;41:93–94.
  • Previtali G, Ravasio R, Seghezzi M, et al. Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;472:123–130.
  • Benovska M, Wiewiorka O, Pinkavova J. Evaluation of FUS-2000 urine analyzer: analytical properties and particle recognition. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 2018;78:143–148.
  • Andersen H, Daae LN, Wien TN. Urine microscopy-an important diagnostic tool. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2014;134:1765–1768.
  • Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Urinalysis; approved guideline-third edition. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2009. (CLSI document GP16-A3).
  • European confederation of Laboratory Medicine. European urinalysis guidelines. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 2000;231:1–86.
  • Oyaert M, Delanghe JR. Semiquantitative, fully automated urine test strip analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019;33:e22870.
  • Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods, approved guideline, third ed. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2014. (CLSI document EP10-A2).
  • Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Evaluation of linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: a statistical approach: approved guideline. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2003. (CLSI document EP06-A).
  • Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Use verification of precision and estimation of bias: approved guideline, third edition. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2014. (CLSI document EP15-A3).
  • Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples: approved guideline. third ed. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2013. (CLSI document EP09-A3).
  • Fogazzi GB, Passerini P, Bazzi M, et al. Use of high power field in the evaluation of formed elements of urine. J Nephrol. 1989;2:107–112.
  • Cohen J. A coeffcient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
  • Wesarachkitti B, Khejonnit V, Pratumvinit B, et al. Performance evaluation and comparison of the fully automated urinanalysis analyzers UX-2000 and Cobas 6500. Lab Med. 2016;47:124–133.
  • Zaman Z, Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, et al. Urine sediment analysis: analytical and diagnostic performance of SediMAX-A new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyzer. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:147–154.
  • Jiang T, Chen P, Ouyang J, et al. Urine particle analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination. Scan J Clin Lab Invest. 2011;71:30–37.
  • Gras JM, Henry N, Othmane M, et al. Assessment of FUS-2000 performance: comparison with quantitative urine culture shows that identifying the right cutoff for optimizing analyzer performance is challenging. J App Lab Med. 2017;1:365–375.
  • Ince FD, Ellidag HY, Koseoglu M, et al. The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis. Prac Lab Med. 2016;5:14–20.
  • Yuksel H, Kılıc E, Ekinci A, et al. Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy. J Clin Lab Anal. 2013;27:312–316.
  • Kocer D, Sarıguzel FM, Karakukcu C. Cut off values for bacteria and leucocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary tract infections. Scan J Lab Invest. 2014;74:414–417.
  • Bartosova K, Kubicek Z, Franekova J, et al. Analysis of four automated urinalysis systems compared to reference methods. Clin Lab. 2016;62:2115–2123.
  • De Rosa R, Grosso S, Bruschetta G, et al. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1137–1142.
  • Tessari A, Osti N, Scarin M. Screening of presumptive urinary tract infectious by the automated urine sediment analyser SediMAX. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1503–1508.
  • Hashimoto A, Tanaka Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Evaluation of fully automated urine particle analyzer Sysmex UF-5000. Japanese J Med Tech. 2017;66:255–265.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.