Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation Volume 80, 2020 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,813
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An experimental study of methods for the analysis of variance components in the inference of laboratory information

Anders KallnerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Elvar TheodorssonDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, SwedenView further author information
Pages 73-80 | Received 22 Sep 2019, Accepted 24 Nov 2019, Published online: 14 Dec 2019

References

  • Kallner A, McQueen M, Heuck C. The Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine, 25-26 April 1999. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:475.
  • Panteghini M, Sandberg S. Defining analytical performance specifications 15 years after the Stockholm conference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:829–32.
  • Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: G. Allen & Unwin; 1940.
  • Kallner A, Theodorsson E. Repeatability imprecision from analysis of duplicates of patient samples. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2020;80(1):73-80.
  • CLSI. EP15-A3. User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness Approved Guideline - Third Edition. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014. Standard No.: ISBN 1-56238-000-0.
  • Kallner A. Measurement verification. [cited 2019 May 8]. Available from: http://www.acb.org.uk/whatwedo/science/best_practice/measurement_verification/measurement-verification-2018
  • Aronsson T, Groth T. Nested control procedures for internal analytical quality control. Theoretical design and practical evaluation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1984;172:51–64.
  • ISO. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. Geneva: International Standards Organisation; 1994. Standard No.: ISO/DIS 5725-2:1994.
  • Kallner A. A study of simulated normal probability functions using Microsoft Excel. Accred Qual Assur. 2016;21:271–76.
  • Kallner A. Laboratory statistics: handbook of formulas and terms. 2nd ed. ISBN: 978-0-12-814348-3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018.
  • Hyslop NP, White WH. Estimating precision using duplicate measurements. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009;59:1032–39.
  • Tukey JW. Variances of variance components: II. The unbalanced single classification. Ann Math Statist. 1957;28:43–56.
  • Tukey JW. Variances of variance components: I. Balanced Designs. Ann Math Statist. 1956;27:722–36.
  • Kallner A, Petersmann A, Nauck M, et al. Measurement repeatability profiles of eight frequently requested measurands in clinical chemistry determined by duplicate measurements of patient samples. Forthcoming. 2019.
  • CLSI. EP5-A3. Establishment of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2014. Standard No.: ISBN 1-56238-000-0.
  • Ayling P, Hill R, Jassam N, et al. A practical tool for monitoring the performance of measuring systems in a laboratory network: report of an ACB Working Group. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017;54:702–06.
  • Springate SD. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg’s formula. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:158–63.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.