Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity: comparison of three Nordic dosimetric methods

References

• Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, et al. Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Eur Respir J. 1993;6:53–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg P, Larsson K, Thunberg S. Increased lung deposition and biological effect of methacholine by use of a drying device for bronchial provocation tests. Eur Respir J. 1991;4:890–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen MM, Lahdensuo A, Kellomaeki L, et al. Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing. Thorax. 1988;43:896–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovijärvi ARA, Malmberg LP, Reinikainen K, et al. A rapid dosimetric method with controlled tidal breathing for histamine challenge: repeatability and distribution of bronchial reactivity in a clinical material. Chest. 1993;104:164–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juusela M, Poussa T, Kotaniemi J, et al. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in a population of north Finland with no previous diagnosis of asthma or chronic bronchitis assessed with histamine and methacholine tests. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2008;67:308–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins BG, Britton JR, Chinn S, et al. Comparison of histamine and methacholine for use in bronchial challenge tests in community studies. Thorax. 1988;43:605–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:309–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates AL, Wanger J, Cockcroft DW, et al. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:1601526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund L, Sundblad BM, Malmberg P, et al. The salt output of a nebulizer-a comparison between two nebulizer types. Respir Med. 2000;94:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundblad BM, Larsson M, Palmberg L, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide and bronchial responsiveness in healthy subjects exposed to organic dust. Eur Respir J. 2002;20:426–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen MM, Holli H, Lahdensuo A, et al. Aerosol deposition in automatic dosimeter nebulization. Eur Respir JDis. 1987;71:145–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg LP, Kauppi P, Mäkelä MJ. Standardizing dose in dosimetric bronchial challenge tests. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging . 2018;38:903–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.medicinescomplete.com/#/content/martindale/4520-n#content%2Fmartindale%2F4520-n%234520-a4-b
   Google Scholar
• Simard B, Turcotte H, Cockcroft DW, et al. Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma. Chest. 2005;127:135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper EF, Frith PA, Dunnett C, et al. Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine. Thorax. 1978;33:705–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. JStat Softw. 2015;67.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen R. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzhov TV, Mullen KM, Spiess AN, et al. minpack.lm: R Interface to the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least-squares algorithm found in MINPACK, plus support for bounds [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=minpack.lm
   Google Scholar
• Hallstrand TS, Leuppi JD, Joos G, et al. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing. Eur Respir J. 2018;52:1801033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrs PO, Sundblad BM, Larsson K. Quality of life and inflammatory markers in mild asthma. Chest. 2006;129:624–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen MM. Unimodal distribution of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic patients. Chest. 1992;102:1537–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor G, Sparrow D, Taylor D, et al. Analysis of dose-response curves to methacholine: an approach suitable for population studies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;136:1412–1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peat JK, Salome CM, Berry G, et al. Relation of dose-response slope to respiratory symptoms and lung function in a population study of adults living in Busselton, Western Australia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:860–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peat JK, Salome CM, Bauman A, et al. Repeatability of histamine bronchial challenge and comparability with methacholine bronchial challenge in a population of Australian schoolchildren. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundblad BM, Malmberg P, Larsson K. Different response to doubling and fourfold dose increases in methacholine provocation tests in healthy subjects. Chest. 2000;118:1371–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundblad BM, Larsson K. Effect of deep inhalations after a bronchial methacholine provocation in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects. Respir Med. 2002;96:477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juusela M, Pallasaho P, Rönmark E, et al. Dose-dependent association of smoking and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1503–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juusela M, Pallasaho P, Sarna S, et al. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in an adult population in Helsinki: decreased FEV1, the main determinant. Clin Respir J. 2013;7:34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela HO, Purokivi MK. Airway oxidative stress in chronic cough. Cough. 2013;9:26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koskela HO, Purokivi MK. Capability of hypertonic saline cough provocation test to predict the response to inhaled corticosteroids in chronic cough: a prospective, open-label study. Cough. 2013;9:15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng M, Yang Z, Pan L, et al. Associations of early life exposures and environmental factors with asthma among children in rural and urban areas of Guangdong, China. Chest. 2016;149:1030–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selinheimo S, Vuokko A, Sainio M, et al. Comparing cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy and psychoeducation for non-specific symptoms associated with indoor air: a randomised control trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela HO, Lätti AM, Purokivi MK. Long-term prognosis of chronic cough: a prospective, observational cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17:146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suojalehto H, Karvala K, Ahonen S, et al. 3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)- benzoic acid: a new cause of sensitiser induced occupational asthma, rhinitis and urticaria. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75:277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmberg L, Sundblad BM, Lindberg A, et al. Long term effect and allergic sensitization in newly employed workers in laboratory animal facilities. Respir Med. 2015;109:1164–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmberg L, Sundblad BM, Ji J, et al. Cholinergic mechanisms in an organic dust model simulating an acute exacerbation in patients with COPD. COPD. 2018; 13:3611–3624.
   Google Scholar
• Hedelin AS, Sundblad BM, Sahlander K, et al. Comparing human respiratory adverse effects after acute exposure to particulate matter in conventional and particle-reduced swine building environments. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73:648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backman H, Hedman L, Stridsman C, et al. A population-based cohort of adults with asthma: mortality and participation in a long-term follow-up. Eur Clin Respir J. 2017;4:1334508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberga G, Groes L, Dahl R. SQ-standardized house dust mite immunotherapy as an immunomodulatory treatment in patients with asthma. Allergy. 2011;66:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollsaeter M, Skromme K, Satrell E, et al. Children born preterm at the turn of the millennium had better lung function than children born similarly preterm in the early 1990s. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0144243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Larsen V, Potts JF, Del Giacco S, et al. Changes in symptoms of asthma and rhinitis by sensitization status over ten years in a cohort of young Chilean adults. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljanen AA, Halttunen PK, Kreus KE, et al. Spirometric studies in non-smoking, healthy adults. Scand J Clin Lab Investig. 1982;42:5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar