Evaluation of venous plasma glucose measured by point-of-care testing (Accu-Chek Inform II) and a hospital laboratory hexokinase method (Cobas c701) in oral glucose tolerance testing during pregnancy – a challenge in diagnostic accuracy

References

• Claerhout H, De Prins M, Mesotten D, et al. Performance of strip-based glucose meters and cassette-based blood gas analyzer for monitoring glucose levels in a surgical intensive care setting. Clin Chem Lab Med.2016;54(1):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzee A, Vyver M, Hoffmann M, et al. A comparison between point-of-care testing and venous glucose determination for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus 6-12 weeks after gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 2019;36(5):591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Claver A, Ramos-Corral R, Lavina-Fananas C, et al. Capillary glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(2):234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsios JV, Ashby LA, Haverstick DM, et al. Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(5):1282–1287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puntmann I, Wosniok W, Haeckel R. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.Clin Chem Lab Med.2003;41(6):809–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floré KMJ, Fiers T, Delanghe JR. Critical evaluation of connectivity-based point of care testing systems of glucose in a hospital environment. Clin Chem Lab Med.2008;46(12):1763–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche. Evaluation report: ACCU-CHEK® inform II test strips. [Internet]; 2013 [cited 2021 Jun 2]; Available from: https://diagnostics.roche.com/content/dam/diagnostics/us/en/products/a/accu-chek-inform-ii/toolkit/IMG-UPE-0613.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Equalis. Swedish national goals for measurement of glucose, guidance for the laboratory; 2018 [cited 2021 Jun 2. Available from: https://www.equalis.se/media/b2cj1rmk/pr008_eng_swedish-national-quality-goals-for-measurement-of-glucose_2018-12-10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nevander S, Landberg E, Blomberg M, et al. Comparison of venous and capillary sampling in oral glucose testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study using Accu-Chek inform II. Diagnostics. 2020;10(12):1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti S, Braga F, Panteghini M. Pre-analytical and analytical aspects affecting clinical reliability of plasma glucose results. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(10–11):587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. WHO/NMH/MND/13.2 [Internet]; 2013 [cited 2021 Jun 2];[46]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85975/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf;jsessionid=24191948D212A22DB0DAC4981FAB5820?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991–2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieu J, McPhee AJ, Crowther CA, et al. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD007222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students.London: George Allen and Unwin; 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen K, Wangel AM, Katsarou A, et al. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus with point-of-Care methods for glucose versus hospital laboratory method using isotope dilution gas Chromatography-Mass spectrometry as reference. J Diabetes Res.2020;2020(Mar 20):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong TD, Cho EJ, Ko DH, et al. Large-scale performance evaluation of Accu-Chek Inform II point-of-care glucose meters. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2016;76(8):657–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukve T, Sandberg S, Vie WS, et al. Commutability of a whole-blood external quality assessment material for point-of-care C-reactive protein, glucose, and hemoglobin testing. Clin Chem. 2019;65(6):791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, et al. Commutability of external quality assessment materials for point-of-care glucose testing using the clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry approaches. J Clin Lab Anal.2020;34(8):e23327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambino R. Glucose harmonization: the role of accurate calibrators. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(1):12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GH, Farrance I, AACB of Unceratinty and Measurement Working Group. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(4):S1–S24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicin. EFLM biological variation database [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 2]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/search?q=glucose.
   Google Scholar
• Coustan DR. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2014;244(suppl 244):27–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nesbitt GS, Smye M, Sheridan B, HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, et al. Integration of local and Central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study: experience from the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Clin Trials. 2006;3(4):397–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida K, Matuse R, Toyoda E, et al. A new method of inhibiting glycolysis in blood samples. Clin Chim Acta.1988;172(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambino R, Piscitelli J, Ackattupathil TA, et al. Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis. Clin Chem. 2009;55(5):1019–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns DE, Knowler WC. Stabilization of glucose in blood samples: why it matters. Clin Chem. 2009;55(5):850–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan AY, Swaminathan R, Cockram CS. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood. Clin Chem. 1989;35(2):315–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2011;57(6):e1–e47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonetti G, Giavarina D, Carta M. Clinical impact of citrate-containing tubes on the detection of glucose abnormalities by the oral glucose tolerance test. Diagnosis.2019;6(4):377–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly N, Flynn I, Carroll C, et al. Comparison of citrate-fluoride-EDTA with fluoride-EDTA additives to stabilize plasma glucose measurements in women being screened during pregnancy with an oral glucose tolerance test: a prospective observational study. Clin Chem. 2016;62(6):886–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar