Evaluation of the Atellica^® UAS 800: a new member of the automated urine sediment analyzer family

References

• Oyaert M, Delanghe J. Progress in automated urinalysis. Ann Lab Med. 2019;39(1):15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho EJ, Ko DH, Lee W, et al. The efficient workflow to decrease the manual microscopic examination of urine sediment using on-screen review of images. Clin Biochem. 2018;56:70–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho J, Oh KJ, Jeon BC, et al. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(11):1744–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Wittwer C. Flow cytometry: principles and clinical applications in hematology. Clin Chem. 2000;46(8):1221–1229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Den Broek D, Keularts IMLW, Wielders JPM, et al. Benefits of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(11):1635–1640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman Z, Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, et al. Urine sediment analysis: analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX – a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411(3–4):147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linko S, Kouri TT, Toivonen E, et al. Analytical performance of the iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;372(1–2):54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falbo R, Sala MR, Bussetti M, et al. Performance evaluation of a new and improved cuvette-based automated urinalysis analyzer with phase contrast microscopy. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;491:126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Ha JS, Ryoo NH. Comparison of the automated cobas u 701 urine microscopy and UF-1000i flow cytometry systems and manual microscopy in the examination of urine sediments. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016;30(5):663–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesarachkitti B, Khejonnit V, Pratumvinit B, et al. Performance evaluation and comparison of the fully automated urinalysis analyzers UX-2000 and cobas 6500. Lab Med. 2016;47(2):124–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altekin E, Kadiçesme O, Akan P, et al. New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber. J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(2):67–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince FD, Ellidağ HY, Koseoğlu M, et al. The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis. Pract Lab Med. 2016;5:14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chien TI, Lu JY, Kao JT, et al. Comparison of three automated urinalysis systems-Bayer Clinitek Atlas, Roche Urisys 2400 and Arkray Aution Max for testing urine chemistry and detection of bacteriuria. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;377(1–2):98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimech W, Roney K. Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture. Pathology. 2002;34(2):170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott JA, Johnson WR, Luke KE. Evaluation of an automated urine chemistry reagent-strip analyzer. J Clin Lab Anal. 1995;9(3):212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias VC, Moschopedis T, Prosser C, et al. Evaluation of the CLINITEK® ATLASTM for routine macroscopic urinalysis. Clin Biochem. 1995;28(3):338.
   Google Scholar
• Huussen J, Koene RAP, Hilbrands LB. The (fixed) urinary sediment, a simple and useful diagnostic tool in patients with haematuria. Neth J Med. 2004;62(1):4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luimstra JJ, Koçer RG, Demir AY. As time goes by, on that you can rely … preservation of urine samples for morphological analysis of erythrocytes and casts. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021;59(5):e201–e204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Snoek BE, Hoitsma AJ, Van Weel C, et al. Dysmorphic erythrocytes in urinary sediment in differentiating urological from nephrological causes of hematuria. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994;138(14):721–726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, et al. Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(18):iii–iiv. xi–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogazzi GB, Edefonti A, Garigali G, et al. Urine erythrocyte morphology in patients with microscopic haematuria caused by a glomerulopathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23(7):1093–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crop MJ, De Rijke YB, Verhagen PCMS, et al. Diagnostic value of urinary dysmorphic erythrocytes in clinical practice. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;115(3):c203–c212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dutch guideline on hematuria. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/hematurie.
   Google Scholar
• Shang Y, Wang Q, Zhang J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of flow cytometry in urinary tract infection screening. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz M, Hörl WH. Common errors in diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection. I: pathophysiology and diagnostic techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14(11):2746–2753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foudraine DE, Bauer MP, Russcher A, et al. Use of automated urine microscopy analysis in clinical diagnosis of urinary tract infection: defining an optimal diagnostic score in an academic medical center population. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(6):e02030–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millán-Lou MI, García-Lechuz JM, Ruiz-Andrés MA, et al. Comparing two automated techniques for the primary screening-out of urine culture. Front Med. 2018;5:353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez MHM, Bottini PV, Levy CE, et al. UriSed as a screening tool for presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;425:77–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Íñigo M, Coello A, Fernández-Rivas G, et al. Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;456:31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessari A, Osti N, Scarin M. Screening of presumptive urinary tract infections by the automated urine sediment analyser sediMAX. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:s1503–s1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Song SA, Urm SH, et al. Evaluation of the Cobas U 701 microscopy analyser compared with urine culture in screening for urinary tract infection. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66(8):1110–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocer D, Sariguzel FM, Karakukcu C. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary-tract infections. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014;74(5):414–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Previtali G, Ravasio R, Seghezzi M, et al. Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;472:123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, et al. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(8):1107–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enko D, Stelzer I, Böckl M, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(2):268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiwejpithaya S, Wongkrajang P, Reesukumal K, et al. UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: a comparative performance analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(2):e22249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boven LA, Kemperman H, Demir AY. A comparative analysis of the iris iQ200 with manual microscopy as a diagnostic tool for dysmorphic erythrocytes in urine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50(4):751–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luimstra JJ, Koçer RG, Jerman A, et al. Current state of the morphological assessment of urinary erythrocytes in The Netherlands: a nation-wide questionnaire. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(11):1891–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar