Reference standard analysis of multiple new and old plasma clearance models and renal clearance with special attention to measurement of reduced glomerular filtration rate

References

• Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Assessing kidney function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2473–2483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Babyn PS, Puetter RC. An improved method for determining renal sufficiency using volume of distribution and weight from bolus 99mTc-DTPA, two blood sample, paediatric data. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27(12):963–970. doi: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000237988.52572.2c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AE, Park-Holohan SJ, Blake GM, et al. Conventional measurements of GFR using 51 Cr-EDTA overestimate true renal clearance by 10 percent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(1):4–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1007-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloerb PR. Total body water distribution of creatinine and urea in nephrectomized dogs. Am J Physiol. 1960;199(4):661–665. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.199.4.661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brøchner-Mortensen J, Freund LG. Reliability of routine clearance methods for assessment of glomerular filtration rate in advanced renal insufficiency. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1981;41(1):91–97. doi: 10.3109/00365518109092020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brøchner-Mortensen J. Current status on assessment and measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Physiol. 1985;5(1):1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1985.tb00742.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickham F, Burniston MT, Xirouchakis E, et al. Development of a modified sampling and calculation method for isotope plasma clearance assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(11):1124–1132. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32836529ab.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFrance ND, Drew HH, Walser M. Radioisotopic measurement of glomerular filtration rate in severe chronic renal failure. J Nuc Med. 1988;29(12):1927–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantler C, Barratt TM. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from plasma clearance of 51-chromium edetic acid. Arch Dis Child. 1972;47(254):613–617. doi: 10.1136/adc.47.254.613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröchner-Mortensen J. A simple method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1972;30(3):271–274. doi: 10.3109/00365517209084290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray AW, Barnfield MC, Waller ML, et al. Assessment of glomerular filtration rate measurement with plasma sampling: a technical review. J Nucl Med Technol. 2013;41(2):67–75. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.121004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming JS. An improved equation for correcting slope–intercept measurements of glomerular filtration rate for the single exponential approximation. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(4):315–320. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328014a14a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jødal L, Brøchner-Mortensen J. Reassessment of a classical single injection 51Cr-EDTA clearance method for determination of renal function in children and adults. Part I: analytically correct relationship between total and one-Pool clearance. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(3):305–313. doi: 10.1080/00365510802566882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng DKS, Schwartz GJ, Jacobson LP, et al. Universal GFR determination based on two time points during plasma iohexol disappearance. Kidney Int. 2011;80(4):423–430. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolph EF. Quantitative relations in the physiological constitutions of mammals. Science. 1949;109(2841):579–585. doi: 10.1126/science.109.2841.579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton R. Defining acute renal failure. CMAJ. 2011;183(10):1167–1169. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prueksaritanont T, Lui CY, Lee MG, et al. Renal and non-renal clearances of iothalamate. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1986;7(4):347–355. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510070405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado C, Baweja M, Crews DC, et al. A unifying approach for GFR estimation: recommendations of the NKF-ASN task force on reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79(2):268.e1–288.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gault MH, Longerich LL, Harnett JD, et al. Predicting glomerular function from adjusted serum creatinine. Nephron. 1992;62(3):249–256. doi: 10.1159/000187054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Ling L, Xirouchakis E, et al. Validation of tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting with 24-h plasma clearance in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(12):2247–2256. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1887-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanasundara SN, Wesolowski MJ, Barnfield MC, et al. Accurate and precise plasma clearance measurement using four 99mTc-DTPA plasma samples over 4 h. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37(1):79–86. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Puetter RC, Ling L, et al. Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting to assess plasma clearance of inert renal markers. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2010;37(5):435–474. doi: 10.1007/s10928-010-9167-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Babyn PS, Puetter RC, et al. Wesolowski, assignee. Method for evaluating renal function US Patent 8,738,345; 2014. https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/8738345.
   Google Scholar
• Wanasundara SN, Wesolowski MJ, Puetter RC, et al. The early plasma concentration of 51Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a comparison of three models. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36(4):392–397. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins C, Gunasekera RD, Mubashar M, et al. Comparative kinetics of microvascular inulin and 99mTc-labelled diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid exchange. Clin Sci. 1997;93(5):471–477. doi: 10.1042/cs0930471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen UL, Hansen HB, Ring-Larsen H, et al. Total plasma clearance versus urinary plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis with and without fluid retention. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015;75(1):64–72. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.980313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell CD, Bischoff PG, Kontzen FN, et al. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate: single injection plasma clearance method without urine collection. J Nuc Med. 1985;26(11):1243–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen JE, Møller ML, Lund JO, et al. Comparison of four commercial Tc-99m (Sn) DTPA preparations used for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate: concise communication. J Nuc Med. 1980;21(2):126–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeusen JW, Kasozi RN, Larson TS, et al. Clinical impact of the refit CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine-based eGFR equation. Clin Chem. 2022;68(4):534–539. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walser M, Bodenlos LJ. Urea metabolism in man. J Clin Invest. 1959;38(9):1617–1626. doi: 10.1172/JCI103940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins RP, Nashat FS, Portal RW, et al. The use of labelled vitamin B12 in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate. J Physiol. 1966;186(2):347–362. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John KA, Cogswell ME, Campbell NR, et al. Accuracy and usefulness of select methods for assessing complete collection of 24-hour urine: a systematic review. J Clin Hypertens. 2016;18(5):456–467. doi: 10.1111/jch.12763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünsal A, Çimentepe E. Voiding position does not affect uroflowmetric parameters and post-void residual urine volume in healthy volunteers. Scand J Clin Lab. 2004;38(6):469–471. doi: 10.1080/00365590410018675.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths DJ, Harrison G, Moore K, et al. Variability of post-void residual urine volume in the elderly. Urol Res. 1996;24(1):23–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00296729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currarino G, Weinberg A, Putnam R. Resorption of contrast material from the bladder during cystourethrography causing an excretory urogram. Radiology. 1977;123(1):149–150. doi: 10.1148/123.1.149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton JT, Weintjes MG, Au JL. Effects of bladder resorption on pharmacokinetic data analysis. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1994;22(3):183–205. doi: 10.1007/bf02353328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood JH, Leonard TW. Kinetic implications of drug resorption from the bladder. Drug Metab Rev. 1983;14(3):407–423. doi: 10.3109/03602538308991395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller ML, Millard RJ. The accuracy of a catheterized residual urine. J Urol. 1989;141(1):15–16. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40572-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves RD. Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC). J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992;20(3):211–226. doi: 10.1007/BF01062525.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Wanasundara SN, Babyn PS, et al. Comparison of the gamma-Pareto convolution with conventional methods of characterising metformin pharmacokinetics in dogs. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020;47(1):19–45. doi: 10.1007/s10928-019-09666-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell CD, Taylor AT, Dubovsky EV. A bayesian regression model for plasma clearance. J Nuc Med. 2002;43(6):762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;21:709–720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke KA. The phantom menace: omitted variable bias in econometric research. Confl Manag Peace Sci. 2005;22(4):341–352. doi: 10.1080/07388940500339183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost C, Thompson SG. Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variable. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A. 2000;163(2):173–189. doi: 10.1111/1467-985X.00164.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox R. A note on the Theil-Sen regression estimator when the regressor is random and the error term is heteroscedastic. Biom J. 1998;40(3):261–268. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199807)40:3<261::AID-BIMJ261>3.0.CO;2-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistini N, Virgili F, Severi S, et al. Relative expansion of extracellular water in obese vs. normal children. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79(1):94–96. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.1.94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidanza F, Keys A, Anderson JT. Density of body fat in man and other mammals. J Appl Physiol. 1953;6(4):252–256. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1953.6.4.252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. The problem of overfitting. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004;44(1):1–12. doi: 10.1021/ci0342472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Wesolowski MJ, Babyn PS, et al. Time varying apparent volume of distribution and drug half-lives following intravenous bolus injections. PLOS One. 2016;11(7):e0158798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz IL, Schachter D, Freinkel N. The measurement of extracellular fluid in man by means of a constant infusion technique. J Clin Invest. 1949;28(5 Pt 2):1117–1125. doi: 10.1172/JCI102145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Wanasundara SN, Wesolowski MJ, et al. A gamma-distribution convolution model of 99mTc-MIBI thyroid time-activity curves. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40658-016-0166-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rostgaard J, Qvortrup K. Electron microscopic demonstrations of filamentous molecular sieve plugs in capillary fenestrae. Microvasc Res. 1997;53(1):1–13. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1996.1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappenheimer JR, Renkin EM, Borrero LM. Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through peripheral capillary membranes: a contribution to the pore theory of capillary permeability. Am J Physiol. 1951;167(1):13–46. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.167.1.13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pappenheimer JR. Passage of molecules through capillary walls. Physiol Rev. 1953;33(3):387–423. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1953.33.3.387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niazi S. Volume of distribution as a function of time. J Pharm Sci. 1976;65(3):452–454. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600650339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Draper NR, et al. Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Vol. 424. New York: Wiley; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmel H, Zegers I. Performance criteria for reference measurement procedures and reference materials. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):899–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard P, Fang H, Davis R. Foundation for the redefinition of the kilogram. Metrologia. 2016;53(5):A6–A11. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/53/5/A6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptáčník V, Terš J, Šámal M, et al. The importance of sampling time in radionuclide measurement of glomerular filtration rate in adults using single blood sample. Clin Transl Imaging. 2023;11(5):493–504. doi: 10.1007/s40336-023-00583-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Hogendoorn P, Vandierendonck R, et al. Bolus injections of measured amounts of radioactivity. J Nucl Med Technol. 1988;16(1):1–4. https://tech.snmjournals.org/content/jnmt/16/1/1.full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science. 1999;284(5420):1677–1679. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5420.1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesolowski CA, Babyn PS, Puetter RC. A power law for determining renal sufficiency using volume of distribution and weight from bolus 99mTc-DTPA, two blood sample, pediatric data. In: 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Vol. 4, pp. 1986–1994). IEEE; 2006.
   Google Scholar