226
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Measurement uncertainty in clinical chemistry: ISO 20914 versus nordtest or intermediate precision versus bias

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 147-153 | Received 08 Dec 2023, Accepted 01 Apr 2024, Published online: 14 May 2024

References

  • Milinković N, Ignjatović S, Šumarac Z, et al. Uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine. J Med Biochem. 2018;37(3):279–288. doi:10.2478/jomb-2018-0002.
  • JCGM 200:2012 International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms. 3rd ed. 2008 Version with minor corrections. Paris, France: BIPM, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures; 2012.
  • Ćelap I, Vukasović I, Juričić G, et al. Minimum requirements for the estimation of measurement uncertainty: recommendations of the joint working group for uncertainty of measurement of the CSMBLM and CCMB. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017;27(3):030502.
  • Çubukçu HC, Yavuz Ö, Devrim E. Uncertainty of measurement for 14 immunoassay analytes: application to laboratory result interpretation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2019;79(1-2):117–122. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.155080630626224
  • ISO/TS 20914:2019(E). Medical laboratories—practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2019.
  • Pasqualetti S, Braga F, Panteghini M. Pre-analytical and analytical aspects affecting clinical reliability of plasma glucose results. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(10-11):587–594. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.009.
  • Lee JH, Choi JH, Youn JS, et al. Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(7):1025–1032. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-0801.
  • ISO 15189:2022. Medical laboratories—requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2022.
  • Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Bernardi D, et al. What information on measurement uncertainty should be communicated to clinicians, and how? Clin Biochem. 2018;57:18–22. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.017.
  • Farrance I, Badrick T, Sikaris KA. Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(8):1309–1311. doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0314.
  • Farrance I, Badrick T, Frenkel R. Uncertainty in measurement and total error: different roads to the same quality destination? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(12):2010–2014. doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-0421.
  • Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, et al. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. Nordtest Report TR 537 (ed. 4). 2017. www.nordtest.info
  • Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, et al. The EFLM Biological Variation Database. https://biologicalvariation.eu/
  • 2024 CLIA Proposed Acceptance Limits for Proficiency Testing. https://www.westgard.com/2024-clia-requirements.htm
  • Çat A, Uçar KT. Calculation of measurement uncertainty of 20 clinical chemistry analytes according to the practical ISO approach. Acibadem Univ Saglik Bilim Derg. 2023;14(1):1–9. doi:10.31067/acusaglik.1174521.
  • Tan R, Kurtulmuş Y, Yilmaz M. A practical approach example to measurement uncertainty: evaluation of 26 immunoassay parameters. Biochem Med. 2022;32(3):030705. doi:10.11613/BM.2022.030705.
  • Ceriotti F. Deriving proper measurement uncertainty from ınternal quality control data: an impossible mission? Clin Biochem. 2018;57:37–40. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.019.
  • Coskun A, Theodorsson E, Oosterhuis WP, et al. Measurement uncertainty for practical use. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;531:352–360. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2022.04.1003.
  • Padoan A, Antonelli G, Aita A, et al. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(11):1696–1701.
  • Martinello F, Snoj N, Skitek M, et al. The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty: which formula should we use in laboratory medicine? Biochem Med. 2020;30(2):020101.
  • Coşkun A. Bias, the unfinished symphony. Biochem Med. 2022;32(3):030402–030345. doi:10.11613/BM.2022.030402.
  • Coskun A. Bias in laboratory medicine: the dark side of the moon. Ann Lab Med. 2024;44(1):6–20. doi:10.3343/alm.2024.44.1.6.
  • CLSI. Using proficiency testing and alternative assessment to ımprove medical laboratory quality. 3rd ed. CLSI guideline QMS24. Wayne, PA: clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.
  • Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, et al. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem. 2011;57(12):1670–1680. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.168641.
  • Badrick T, Miller WG, Panteghini M, et al. Interpreting EQA-Understanding why commutability of materials matters. Clin Chem. 2022;68(4):494–500. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvac002.
  • Mercan F, Serdar M, Senes M, et al. National external quality assessment follow-up: 2010–2017 turkish experience. Turk J Biochem. 2019;44(1):1–8. doi:10.1515/tjb-2018-0464.
  • Dallas Jones GR. Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(8):1303–1307. doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0311.
  • Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Gurr E, et al. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(8):1161–1171.
  • Oosterhuis WP, Theodorsson E. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(2):235–239. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0997.
  • Plebani M. Harmonization of clinical laboratory information – current and future strategies. EJIFCC. 2016;27(1):15–22.
  • Greenberg N. Update on current concepts and meanings in laboratory medicine—standardization, traceability and harmonization. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:49–54. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.045.
  • Plebani M, Lippi G. Standardization and harmonization in laboratory medicine: not only for clinical chemistry measurands. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023;61(5):721–731. doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-1122.
  • Wauthier L, Di Chiaro L, Favresse J. Sigma metrics in laboratory medicine: a call for harmonization. Clin Chim Acta. 2022;532:13–20. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.012.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.