Mathematical tools for demonstrating the clinical usefulness of biochemical markers

References

• Magid E. Some concepts and principles of clinical test evaluation. Introduction. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1992; 9–12, Suppl 208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig M H, Robertson E A. Why we need better test evaluations. Clin Chem 1982; 28: 1272–1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson E A, Zweig M H, Van Steirteghem A C. Evaluationg the clinical efficacy of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 79: 78–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller-Petersen J. Evaluation of diagnostic tests. Design and phases. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1992; 35–50, Suppl 208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D L. Users' guides to the medical literature, III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test, A. Are the results of the study valid?. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 271: 389–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid M C, Lachs M S, Feinstein A R. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 274: 645–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenstein P N. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 93: 252–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg C G. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med 1987; 6: 411–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui S L, Walter S D. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 1980; 36: 167–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter S D, Irwig L M. Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 923–937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulzer M, Anderson D R, Drance S M. Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1167–1179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staquet M, Rozencweig M, Lee Y J, Muggia F M. Methodology for the assessment of new dichotomous diagnostic tests. J Chronic Dis 1981; 34: 599–610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ransohoff D F, Feinstein A R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 926–930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon W J, Massey F J, Jr. Introduction to Statistical Analysis, fourth edition. McGraw-Hill, New York 1983; 319–324
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg R A, Jekel J F. Some problems in the determination of the false positive and false negative rates of tuberculin tests. Am Rev Respir Dis 1969; 100: 645–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein M C. Clinical Decision Analysis. Saunders, Phildelphia 1980
   Google Scholar
• Patrick E A. Decision analysis in medicine: methods and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1979
   Google Scholar
• Yerushalmy J. Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public Health Rep 1947; 62: 1432–1449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio T J. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med 1966; 274: 1171–1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen R S, Gambino S R. Beyond normality: the predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses. Wiley, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss J L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York 1981; 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Boyd J C, Marr J J. Decreasing reliability of acid-fast smear techniques for detection of tuberculosis. Ann Int Med 1975; 82: 489–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein A R. Clinical biostatistics XXXIX. The haze of Bayes, the aerial palaces of decision analysis and the computerized Ouija board. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977; 21: 482–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J C, Ladenson J H. Value of laboratory tests in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia. Am J Med 1984; 77: 863–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt W. The Bayes approach: Systematic graphic evaluation of diagnostic tests. Data Presentation Interpretation, H Keller, Ch Trendelenburg. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGermany 1989; 161–204
   Google Scholar
• Zweig M H, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 561–577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic curve. J Math Psychol 1975; 12: 387–415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell G. General methodology I. Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. Stat Med 1994; 13: 499–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClish D K. Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve. Med Decis Making 1989; 9: 190–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil B J, Hanley J A. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Decis Making 1984; 4: 137–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClish D K. Comparing areas under more than two independent ROC curves. Med Decis Making 1987; 7: 149–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley J A, McNeil B J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong E R, DeLong D M, Clarke-Pearson D L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837–845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J C, Lewis J W, Slatopolsky E, Ladenson J H. Parathyrin measured concurrently with free or total calcium in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia. Clin Chem 1981; 27: 574–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 2nd ed. PWS Publishers, Boston 1986; 402
   Google Scholar
• BMDP Statistical Software, W J Dixon. UCLA Press, Berkeley, CA 1990; 1013
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Sas Institute Inc., Cary, NC 1988; 189
   Google Scholar
• Albert A, Harris E K. Multivariate Interpretation of Clinical Laboratory Data. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 1987; 116–122
   Google Scholar
• Albert A. On the use and computation of likelihood ratios in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1982; 28: 1113–1119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert A, Harris E K. 93–94, Op. Cit.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd J C, Herold D A. A likelihood ratio function to aid in the interpretation of TDx FLM results. Clin Chem 1991; 37(6)988
   Google Scholar
• Russell J C, Cooper C M, Ketchum C H, Torday J S, Richardson D K, Holt J A, Kaplan L A, Swanson J R, Ivie W M. Multicenter evaluation of Tdx test for assessing fetal lung maturity. Clin Chem 1989; 35: 1005–1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar