Endosonography in anorectal disease: An overview

References

• Rifkin D. Endosonography of the prostate: clinical impactions. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 1137–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Ecker KW. Rectal endosonography. Bailliere. s Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 3: 531–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law PJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 370–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover J. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 752–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun WM, Peck RJ, Shorthouse AJ, Read NW. Haemorrhoids are associated not with hypertrophy of the internal anal sphincter, but with hypertension of the anal cushions. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 592–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA. Anorectal endosonography in benign anorectal disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28 Suppl 200: 70–3
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 59–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley MRB, Kumar D. Fistulas in ano:endoanal ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 1994; 35: 391–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Rasmussen OO, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal endosonographic findings in patients with obstructed defecation. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 35–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckardt VF, Jung B, Fischer B, Lierse W. Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 235–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Derksen EJ, Boutkan H, Meuwissen SG. Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 59–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJF, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen S. Referral for anorectal function evaluation: therapeutic implications and reassurance. Eur J Hepatol Gastroenterol 1999; 11: 289–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farouk R, Bartolo D. The clinical contribution of integrated laboratory and ambulatory anorectal physiology assessment in faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993; 8: 60–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudol-Szopinska I, Jabubowski W. Endosonography of anal canal diseases. Ultrasound Q 2002; 18: 13–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography. Technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointestinal Radiol 1989; 14: 349–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enck P, von GHJ, Schafer A, et al. Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2539–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 1199–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hizawa K, Iida M, Suekane H, et al. Mucosal prolapse syndrome: diagnosis with endoscopic US. Radiology 1994; 191: 527–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Buchmann P. Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 217–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijers OB, Tio TL, Tytgat GNJ. Ultrasonography and endosonography in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 559–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tio TL, Mulder CJJ, Wijers OB, Sars PRT, Tytgat GNJ. Endosonography of peri-anal and peri-colorectal fistula and/or abscess in Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 331–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, GA, Di Falco, G. Endoanal ultrasonography in the staging of anal carcinoma. In:. Atlas of endoanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM, et al. Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 465–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Anal sphincter size measured by endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex and parity. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 453–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorect Dis 1991; 6: 2–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 508–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls JR, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 368–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Anal endosonography in asymptomatic subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 551–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes B, Kohler HH, Zielke A, Kisker O, Barth PJ, Stinner B. The anatomical basis of anal endosonography – a study in postmortem specimens. Surg Endoscopy 1997; 11: 986–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Normal values and reproducibility of anal endosonographic measurements. Eur J Ultrasound 1997; 6: 103–10
   Google Scholar
• Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR, Smith AN. Significance of the thickness of the anal sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 710–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF. Changes in the anal sphincter with age. An endosonographic study. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 357–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer R, Heyer T, Gantke B, et al. Anal endosonography and manometry: comparison in patients with defecation problems. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 293–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ. Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1037–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblem R, Dhaenens G, Stien R, Morkric L, Aasen AO, Bergan A. The importance of anal endosonography in the evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 42–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Offner F, Topf N, Vogel P, Mittermayer C. Sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter: a process of aging. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 606–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Anal endosonography in haemorroidal disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications?. Colorectal Dis 1999; 1: 146–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RKS. Haemorrhoids: pathology, pathophysiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 946–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerremans R. Morphological and physiological aspects of anal incontinence and defaecation. Editions Arscia, Brussels 1969
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, E, Morgan, C. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal with special reference to anorectal fistulae. Lancet 1934;ii: 1150–6, 1213–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lunniss PJ, Phillips R. Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 882–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter complex is important in the diagnosis of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 359–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977; 18: 656–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in child birth. Lancet 1984; ii: 546–50
   Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 1994; 344: 730–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1333–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Holmstrom B, Nilsson BY, Tisell A, Anzen B, et al. Obstetric sphincter tears and anal incontinence: an observational follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 921–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R, Vuagnat A, Benifla JL, Darai E, et al. Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 590–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benifla JL, Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R, Darai E, Mignon M, et al. Postpartum sphincter rupture and anal incontinence: prospective study with 259 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2000; 28: 15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJ, van BR, Koorevaar M, Strijers RL, Cuesta MA. Unsuspected sphincter defects shown by anal endosonography after anorectal surgery. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 249–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1031–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouk R, Drew P, Duthie G, Lee P, Moson J. Disruption of the internal anal sphincter can occur after transanal stapling. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvis R, van Eekelen JW, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG. Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Relation with anal manometry and fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 383–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 1997; 349: 612–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel AF, Kamm MA, Talbot IC. Progressive systemic sclerosis of the internal anal sphincter leading to passive faecal incontinence. Gut 1994; 35: 857–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma R, Gort G, Meuwissen S. Normal values in anal manometry and rectal sensation: a problem of range. Hepato Gastroenterol 1991; 38: 444–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Spence Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 225–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M, et al. Anal endosonography: relationship with anal manometry and neurophysiologic tests. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 944–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 463–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 771–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger NA, Sweeney JL, Hoffmann DC, Young JF, Hunter A. Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 860–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A. External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre-operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 6–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 448–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MRB. Anal sphincter defects: correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 201–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 689–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk PM, Blatchford GJ, Cali RL, Christensen MA, Thorson AG. Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 468–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinta TM, Kylanpaa ML, Salmi TK, Teramo KA, Luukkonen PS. Primary sphincter repair: are the results of the operation good enough?. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 18–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch H, Brenner E, Lienemann A, Ludwikowski B. Anal sphincter complex: reinterpreted morphology and its clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 188–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M. Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 878–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Dammegaard L, Pedersen JF. Endosonographic assessment of the anal sphincter after surgical reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 434–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Third degree perineal rupture: long term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1433–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzler PJ, Thomson JP. Overlap repair of damaged anal sphincter. A single surgeon's series. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 1356–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1231–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel AF, Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Sphincteroplasty for incontinence after surgery for idiopathic fistula in ano. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 323–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ternent CA, Shashidharan M, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Sentovich SM. Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 462–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giordano P, Renzi A, Efron J, Gervaz P, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, et al. Previous sphincter repair does not affect the outcome of repeat repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 635–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Dhillon S, Kamm M. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 741–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley M. The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence. A prospective endosonic study. Gut 1993; 34: 685–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DM, Behan M, Donnelly VS, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR. Endosonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury using a 120 degree sector scanner. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 559–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CM, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. Br Med J 1994; 308: 887–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Irion O, Bretones S, Stan C, Weil A. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography predict fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 643–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faridi A, Willis S, Schelzig P, Siggelkow W, Schumpelick V, Rath W. Anal sphincter injury during vaginal delivery: an argument for cesarean section on request?. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 379–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong D, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 1158–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultrasound in the diagnosis of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1147–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iroatulam, A, Nogueras, J, Chen, H, , et al. Accuracy of endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating anal fistulas. Gastroenterology 1997;112 Suppl:A1450.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro-Luna A, Garcia-Domingo MI, Rius-Macias J, Marco-Molina C. Ultrasound study of anal fistulas with hydrogen peroxide enhancement. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 108–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudol-Szopinska I, Jakubowski W, Szczepkowski M. Contrast-enhanced endosonography for the diagnosis of anal and anovaginal fistulas. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 145–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloots CEJ, Felt-Bersma RJF, Poen AC, Cuesta MA. Assessment and classification of never operated and recurrent cryptoglandular fistulas-in-ano using hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultrasound. Colorectal Dis 2001; 6: 422–7
   Google Scholar
• Sloots CEJ, Felt-Bersma RJF, Poen AC, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Assessment and classification of fistula-in-ano in patients with Crohn's disease by hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultrsound. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16: 292–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudol-Szopinska I, Gesla J, Jakubowski W, Noszczyk W, Szczepkowsi M, Sarti D. Reliability of endosonography in evaluation of anal fistulae and abscesses. Acta Radiol 2002; 43: 599–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West RL, Zimmerman DD, Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Hop WC, Schouten WR, et al. Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perinanal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1407–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, RL, Woude van der, CJ, Hansen, BE, Felt-Bersma, RJF, Kuipers, EJ. Clinical and endosonographic effect of ciprofloxacine on the treatment of perianal fistulas. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodegraven AA van, Sloots CEJ, Felt-Bersma RJF, Meuwissen SGM. Endosonographic evidence of persistence of Crohn's disease associated fistulas after infliximab treatment, irrespective of clinical response. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 39–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schratter SA, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, Schurawitzki H, Herold C, Schratter M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn's disease. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 582–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schratter SA, Lochs H, Handl ZL, Tscholakoff D, Schratter M. Endosonographic features of the lower pelvic region in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1054–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon M. Fistulae and abscesses in symptomatic perianal Crohn's disease. Int J Colorect Dis 1996; 11: 222–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon MJ, McLeod RS, Cohen EK, Cohen Z. Anal wall thickness under normal and inflammatory conditions of the anorectum as determined by endoluminal ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 574–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA, Michielsen PP, Van Maercke YM. Value of transrectal ultrasonography in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 1171–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamm MA, Hoyle CH, Burleigh DE, et al. Hereditary internal anal sphincter myopathy causing proctalgia fugax and constipation. A newly identified condition. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 805–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckardt VF, Dodt O, Kanzler G, Bernhard G. Anorectal function and morphology in patients with sporadic proctalgia fugax. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 755–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SGM. Anal endosonography in haemorroidal disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications?. Colorectal Dis 1999; 1: 146–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL, et al. Stapled haemorroidectomy – cost effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 43: 1666–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, GA, Di Falco, G. Endoluminal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. In:. Atlas of endoanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Yu CS, Jung HY, Kim HC, Kim SY, Park SK, et al. Source of errors in the evaluation of early rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1302–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000; 15: 9–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Agular J, Pollack J, Lee SH, Hernandez de Anda E, Mellgren A, Wong WD, et al. Accuracy of endoanal ultrsonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumours. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 10–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavioli M, Bagni A, Piccagli I, Fundaro S, Natalini G. Usefulness of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer: comparison between sonographic and histopathological changes. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1075–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanagunas A, Lin DE, Strijker SJ. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for re-staging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 109–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunerbein M, Totkas S, Moesta KT, Ulmer C, Handke T, Schlag PM. The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the postoperative follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Surgery 2001; 129: 164–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drudi FM, Giovagnorio F, Raffetto N, Ricci P, Cascone F, Santarelli M, et al. Transrectal ultrasound color Doppler in the evaluation of recurrence of anal canal cancer. Eur J Radiol 2003; 47: 142–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giovannini M, Bardou VJ, Barclay R, Palazzo L, Roseau G, Helbert T, et al. Anal carcinoma: prognostic value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). Results of a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 231–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarantino D, Bernstein MA. Endoanal ultrasound in the staging and management of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: potential implications of a new ultrasound staging system. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 16–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdeburg B, Fried M, Meyenberger C. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of anal carcinomas. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 359–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudol-Szopinska I, Szczepkowski M, Jakubowski W. Anal ultrasound in the diagnosis of anal carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 2001; 35: 273–6
   Google Scholar
• Lund, JA, Sundstrom, SH, Haaverstad, R, Wibe, A, Svinsaas, M, Myrvold, HE. Endoanal ultrasound is of little value in follow-up of anal carcinomas. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; Apr 19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen AF, Nielsen MB, Engelholm SA, Roed H, Svendsen LB, Christensen H. Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve staging of anal cancer compared with two-dimensional endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 341–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, GA, Di Falco, G. Endoanal ultrasonography in the staging of anal carcinoma. In:. Atlas of endoanal and endorectal ultrasonography. Milan: Springer-Verlag; 2004. p. 141–51.
   Google Scholar