Characteristics of metachronous colorectal adenomas found during long-term follow-up: Analysis of four subsequent generations of adenoma recurrence

References

• Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morson BC. Evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1974; 34: 845–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 392: 1977–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in the adenoma surveillance program. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 869–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32702 veterans. Ann Int Med 1995; 123: 904–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff G, Sauar J, Vatn MH, Larsen S, Langmark F, Moen IE, et al. Polypectomy of adenomas in the prevention of colorectal cancer: 10 years’ follow-up of the Telemark polyp study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 1006–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Rasmussen M. Influence of long-term colonoscopic surveillance on incidence of colorectal cancer and death from the disease in patients with precursors (adenomas). Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 355–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 175–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenna E, Skreden K, Waldum HL. The benefit of colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990; 25: 81–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nava H, Carlsson G, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelman A. Follow-up colonoscopy in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 465–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugut AI, Johnsen CM, Forde KA, Treat MR. Recurrence rates for colorectal polyps. Cancer 1985; 55: 1586–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waye JD, Braunfeld S. Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy. Endoscopy 1982; 14: 79–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfson IK, Eckholdt GJ, Wetzel CR. Usefulness of performing colonoscopy one year after endoscopic polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 389–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 901–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995; 30: 686–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusko G, Mansmann U, Kirchner T, Hahn EG. Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy. Gut 2002; 51: 424–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker F, Nusko G, Welke J, Hahn EG, Mansmann U. Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy: a benefit–risk analysis of German surveillance recommendations. Int J Colorect Dis 2007; 22: 929–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, Huitfeldt HS, Rognum T, Larsen S, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 449–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S, Osnes M. Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 640–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zauber AG, Winawer SJ. Initial management and follow-up surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1997; 26: 85–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, Bond HJ, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Stewart ET, et al. Can surveillance intervals be lengthened following colonoscopic polypectomy?. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: A50
   Google Scholar
• Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, Haile R, Summers R. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 13–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, Cabeza E, O'Morain C, Kronborg O, et al. European Cancer Prevention Organisation Study Group: colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 323–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, Beck GJ. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 433–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Stürmer T, Hoffmeister M. Case-control study supports extension of surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1739–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, Ahnen DJ, Provenzale D, Sontag SJ, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1077–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafferty FH, Wong JM, Yen AM, Duffy SW, Atkin WS, Chen TH. Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities: effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up. Cancer J 2007; 13: 263–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kronborg O, Jorgensen OD, Fenger C, Rasmussen M. Three randomized long-term surveillance trials in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 737–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, Sandler RS, Ahnen D, Haile RW, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 34–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jass JR, Sobin LH. Histological typing of intestinal tumours. WHO international classification of tumours2nd ed. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo 1989
   Google Scholar
• Moertel CG, Bargen JA, Dockerty MB. Multiple carcinomas of the large intestine. A review of the literature and a study of 261 cases. Gastroenterology 1958; 34: 85–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1781–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, et al. The national polyp study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 371–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen Adenoma Follow-Up Study. Characteristics of patients and initial adenomas in relation to severe dysplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 239–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Kessler H, Wittekind Ch, Hahn EG. Differences between colorectal adenomas removed endoscopically and surgically. Multivariate analysis of patient and polyp charcteristics of the risk for high-grade dysplasia. Hepato-Gastroenterol 1997; 44: 1063–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermanek P, Frühmorgen P, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Altendorf A, Matek W. The malignant potential of colorectal polyps: a new statistical approach. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Groitl H, Wittekind C, et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas. Multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 626–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Groitl H, Wittekind Ch, Hahn EG. Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by histological type, size and site. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 267–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982; 23: 835–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn MH, Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study. Cancer 1982; 49: 819–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert RR, Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM. Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer 1979; 43: 1847–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminski TC, McLean DW. Incidence and distribution of adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum based on 1000 autopsy examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 1964; 7: 249–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stemmerman GN, Yatani R. Diverticulosis and polyps of the large intestine: a necropsy study of Hawaii Japanese. Cancer 1973; 31: 1260–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM, Smith JJ, Pound DC, Hawes RH, et al. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood test: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 825–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Stewart ET, et al. The national polyp study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. Cancer 1992; 70: 1236–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ, Jones DM, VanNess MM, Chobanian SJ, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 969–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Lehman GA, Hawes RH, Ulbright TM, Smith JJ. Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 64–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland RJ, Becciolini C, Lallemand RC. The value of colonoscopic surveillance following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyp. Eur J Surg Oncol 1991; 17: 514–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winawer SJ. Follow-up after polypectomy. World J Surg 1991; 15: 25–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Kawabe T, et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut 2004; 53: 568–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, Leya J, Metz A, Sontag SJ. New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1524–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, Pizzetti P, Ballardini G, Andreola S, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporatic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer 2003; 20: 82–7
   Google Scholar
• Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, Sansbury LB, Wang Z, Cross AJ, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 419–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixson LS, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, McGee D, Garewal H. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Nat Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008; 57: 1406–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, Bhattacharyya AK, Reid ME, Alberts DS. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1077–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, et al. Right-side shift of colorectal adenomas with aging. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 453–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Yoshida H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Ikuma H, et al. Right-side shift of metachronous colorectal adenomas after polypectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 1466–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff G, Vatn MH. Colonic adenomas: natural history. Dig Dis 1991; 9: 61–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkin WS, Saunders BP. Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut 2002; 51(Suppl 5)V6–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmiegel WA, Pox C, Adler G, Fleig W, Fölsch U, Frühmorgen P, et al. S3-Guidelines Conference “Colorectal Carcinoma” 2004. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42: 1129–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale. Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer SJ. Appropriate intervals for surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: S63–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Church T, Yokochi LA, Doria-Rose VP, et al. The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 86–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nusko G, Sachse R, Mansmann U, Wittekind Ch, Hahn EG. K-ras-2 gene mutations as predictors of metachronous colorectal adenomas. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 1035–4169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soreide K, Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Janssen EA, Van Diermen B, Körner H, et al. Metachronous cancer development in patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas: multivariate risk model with independent and combined value of hTERT and surviving. Int J Colorect Dis 2008; 23: 389–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar