402
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis

, , , , &
Pages 1249-1256 | Received 26 Mar 2016, Accepted 19 Apr 2016, Published online: 16 May 2016

References

  • Krawczyk M, Francisco Miquel J, Stokes CS, et al. Genetics of biliary lithiasis from an ethnic perspective. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:119–125.
  • Costi R, Gnocchi A, Di Mario F, et al. Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13382–13401.
  • Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology. 1991;181:805–808.
  • Griffin N, Charles-Edwards G, Grant LA. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights Imaging. 2012;3:11–21.
  • Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2900–2904.
  • Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:809–813.
  • Hekimoglu K, Ustundag Y, Dusak A, et al. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature. J Dig Dis. 2008;9:162–169.
  • Mandelia A, Gupta AK, Verma DK, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1941–1945.
  • Chang JH, Lee IS, Lim YS, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:217–224.
  • McMahon CJ. The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi: a critically appraised topic. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:6–9.
  • Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90:42–47.
  • Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, et al. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64: 248–254.
  • Aydelotte JD, Ali J, Huynh PT, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice: not as good as we once thought. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2015;221:215–219.
  • Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut. 1999;44:118–122.
  • Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2000;33:520–527.
  • Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Yukisawa S, et al. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for clinically suspicious spontaneous passage of bile duct stones. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:736–740.
  • Ward WH, Fluke LM, Hoagland BD, et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh the costs? Am Surgeon. 2015;81:720–725.
  • Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2000;135:148–152.
  • Scaffidi MG, Luigiano C, Consolo P, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study. Miner Med. 2009;100:341–348.
  • Stiris MG, Tennoe B, Aadland E, et al. MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987). 2000;41:269–272.
  • Toppi JT, Johnson MA, Page P, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: utilization and usefulness in suspected choledocholithiasis. ANZ J Surg. 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1111/ans.12867.
  • Chen W, Mo JJ, Lin L, et al. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3351–3360.
  • Heller SL, Lee VS. MR imaging of the gallbladder and biliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 2005;13:295–311.
  • Downey RT, Wells SA, Liu PS. Advances in biliary imaging. Eur J Clin Med Oncol. 2010;2:1–8.
  • Cavdar F, Yildar M, Tellioglu G, et al. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP? Pancreatology. 2014;14:411–414.
  • Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Spontaneous passage of bile duct stones: frequency of occurrence and relation to clinical presentation. Ann R Coll Surgeons Engl. 2003;85:174–177.
  • Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:175–179.
  • Tse F, Barkun JS, Romagnuolo J, et al. Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction. HPB. 2006;8:409–425.
  • Srinivasa S, Sammour T, McEntee B, et al. Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis. Can J Surg. 2010;53:403–407. Epub 2010/11/26. PubMed PMID: 21092433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2993039.
  • Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1620–1624.
  • Wong HP, Chiu YL, Shiu BH, et al. Preoperative MRCP to detect choledocholithiasis in acute calculous cholecystitis. J Hepato-biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2012;19:458–464.
  • Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg. 1999;229:362–368.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.