Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis

References

• Tsikitis VL, Wertheim BC, Guerrero MA. Trends of incidence and survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in the United States: a seer analysis. J Cancer. 2012;3:292–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito T, Sasano H, Tanaka M, et al. Epidemiological study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis L, Shale MJ, Coleman MP. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: trends in incidence in England since 1971. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2563–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European neuroendocrine tumour society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:909–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho MY, Kim JM, Sohn JH, et al. Current trends of the incidence and pathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in Korea 2000–2009: multicenter study. Cancer Res Treat. 2010;44:157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li AF, Hsu CY, Li A, et al. A 35-year retrospective study of carcinoid tumors in Taiwan: differences in distribution with a high probability of associated second primary malignancies. Cancer. 2008;112:274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott FD, Heeney A, Courtney D, et al. Rectal carcinoids: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2020–2026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Peng J, Yang W, et al. Prognostic analysis for carcinoid tumours of the rectum: a single institutional analysis of 106 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2010;13:150–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz P, Reidy Lagunes D, Anthony L, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013;42:557–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherübl H, de Mestier L, Cadiot G. Therapy of rectal carcinoids of 11 to 19 mm: a matter of debate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:532–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun AH. The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using dual channel scope in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumor. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:A372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WH, Kim SW, Lim CH, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4313–4318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HW, Byeon JS, Park YS, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xiang L, Li A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors 7–16 mm in diameter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:375–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashimo Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi M, Sekine S, Sakamoto T, et al. Excellent prognosis following endoscopic resection of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors despite the frequent presence of lymphovascular invasion. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:1184–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono A, Fujii T, Saito Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:583–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Yao LQ, Xu MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal carcinoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong DD, Shao LM, Cai JT. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal carcinoid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Liu X, Sun S, et al. Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumor. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26:e56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung DY, Choi SK, Kim HK, et al. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1500–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW, et al. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:432–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH, Byeon JS, Park H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dessection for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumor. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:A284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo J, Jeon SW, Jung MK, et al. A tailored approach for endoscopic treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumor. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2931–2938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lu ZS, Yang YS, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumours. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:23–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im YC, Jung SW, Cha HJ, et al. The effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal carcinoid tumors: focused on previously biopsied tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24:264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HH, Park SJ, Lee SH, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for removing small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with endoscopic mucosal resection: analysis of 100 cases. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, Eo SJ, Shim SG, et al. Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Jeon SW, Park SY, et al. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2010;42:647–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Kim SB, Shin CM, et al. A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors. Surg Endosc. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Song GA, Kim DU, et al. Endoscopic treatment options for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: ESD versus EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:A297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim TW, Ryu DG, Kim WC, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with CAP demonstrates a superior rate of histologic complete resection over endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:AB282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niimi K, Goto O, Fujishiro M, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device or endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of 24 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc. 2010;24:443–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Iizuka H, et al. Endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:169–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung HY, Kim SW, Kang WK, et al. Long-term prognosis of an endoscopically treated rectal neuroendocrine tumor: 10-year experience in. A single institution. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:978–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZF, Zhang N, Ma SR, et al. A comparative study on endoscopy treatment in rectal carcinoid tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY, et al. Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection with needle-knife over endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2607–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe T, Kakemura T, Fujinuma S, et al. Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4054–4058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Ishii N, Uemura M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:759–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii N, Horiki N, Itoh T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and preoperative assessment with endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1413–1419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SB, Kim HW, Kang DH, et al. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9387–9393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasuga A, Chino A, Uragami N, et al. Treatment strategy for rectal carcinoids:a clinicopathological analysis of 229 cases at a single cancer institution. J Gastroenterol Hepat. 2012;27:1801–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields CJ, Tiret E, Winter DC, International Rectal Carcinoid Study Group. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: a multi-institutional international collaboration. Ann Surg. 2010;252:750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson FC, Levy MJ, Dozois EJ, et al. Endoscopically identified well-differentiated rectal carcinoid tumors:impact of tumor size on the natural history and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, et al. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009;41:751–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Kim ES, Cho KB, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes among different endoscopic resection methods for treating colorectalneoplasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1727–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V, et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:1042–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar