Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy

References

• www.wcrf.org/cancer_statistics/. http://www.wcrf.org/cancer_statistics/data_specific_cancers/colorectal_cancer_statistics.php [cited 2015 Jul 2]. Available from: URL: http://www.wcrf.org/cancer_statistics/data_specific_cancers/colorectal_cancer_statistics.php
   Google Scholar
• Haggar FA, Boushey RP. Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009;22:191–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, et al. Impact of screening colonoscopy on outcomes in colon cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:747–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valori R, Rey JF, Atkin WS, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition–quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:SE88–S105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA, et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut. 2016;65:607–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, et al. ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ. Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:516–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a direct observation of procedural skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:591–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE. The Mayo colonoscopy skills assessment tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1125–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1417–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisler L, Svendsen MB, Nerup N, et al. Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: establishing criteria for competency. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaghie WC, Butter J, Kaye M. Observational assessment. In: Downing SM, Yudkowsky R, editors. Assessment in health professions education. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 185–215.
   Google Scholar
• Magill RA. The stages of learning. Motor learning and control. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007. p. 263–289.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen MB, Preisler L, Hillingsoe JG, et al. Using motion capture to assess colonoscopy experience level. WJGE. 2014;6:193–199.
   Google Scholar
• Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MB, et al. Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:548–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konge L, Ringsted C, Bjerrum F, et al. The Simulation Centre at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:362–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane M, Case SM. The reliability and validity of weighted composite scores. Appl Meas Educ. 2004;17:221–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004;38:1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hove PD, Tuijthof GJ, Verdaasdonk EG, et al. Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg. 2010;97:972–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konge L, Vilmann P, Clementsen P, et al. Reliable and valid assessment of competence in endoscopic ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Endoscopy. 2012;44:928–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Reliability. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, editors. Health measurement scales – a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 167–210.
   Google Scholar
• Shah SG, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, et al. Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:568–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike EL. A constant error in psychological ratings. J Appl Psychol. 1920;4:25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Donnon T, Al AA, Al AS, et al. The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89:511–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood T, Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1224–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM, et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2010;59:181–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC, Carnahan H. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD008237.
   Google Scholar
• Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, West CP. Perspective: reconsidering the focus on ‘outcomes research’ in medical education: a cautionary note. Acad Med. 2013;88:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, et al. Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:631–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, et al. Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisler L, Sondergaard Svendsen MB, Sondergaard B, et al. Automatic and unbiased assessment of competence in colonoscopy: exploring validity of the Colonoscopy Progression Score (CoPS). Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1238–E1243.
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Hatala R. Got power? A systematic review of sample size adequacy in health professions education research. Adv in Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015;20:73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:798–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar