References
- Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6:991–1030.
- de Zeeuw S, Ahmed Ali U, Donders RA, et al. Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:843–853.
- McGuire BB, Brannigan AE, O'Connell PR. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2007;94:812–823.
- Tajti J Jr, Simonka Z, Paszt A, et al. Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of ulcerative colitis; short- and mid-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:406–412.
- Lichtenstein GR, Cohen R, Yamashita B, et al. Quality of life after proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:669–677.
- Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33:328–336.
- Haapamaki J, Roine RP, Sintonen H, et al. Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease measured with the generic 15D instrument. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:919–928.
- Koskinen S, Lundqvist A, Ristiluoma N. Health, functional capacity and welfare in Finland in 2011. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); 2012. Report No.: 68/2012.
- Alanne S, Roine RP, Rasanen P, et al. Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:599–606.
- Berndtsson I, Lindholm E, Oresland T, et al. Long-term outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: function and health-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1545–1552.
- Carmon E, Keidar A, Ravid A, et al. The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Colorect Dis. 2003;5:228–232.
- Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:221–228.
- Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:575–584. discussion 584–586.
- Muir AJ, Edwards LJ, Sanders LL, et al. A prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1480–1485.
- Robb B, Pritts T, Gang G, et al. Quality of life in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at the University of Cincinnati. Am J Surg. 2002;183:353–360.
- Young CJ, Solomon MJ, Eyers AA, et al. Evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure at one institution: the first 100 cases. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:438–442.
- Steens J, Meijerink WJ, Masclee AA, et al. Limited influence of pouch function on quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:746–750.
- Koerdt S, Jehle EC, Kreis ME, et al. Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:545–554.
- Sagap I, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, et al. Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) – a multivariate analysis. Surgery. 2006;140:691–703. discussion 703–704.
- Sohn YJ, Moon SM, Shin US, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28:241–246.
- Meijs S, Gardenbroek TJ, Sprangers MA, et al. Health-related quality of life and disability in patients with ulcerative colitis and proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch versus treatment with anti-TNF agents. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:686–692.
- Erkek AB, Remzi FH, Hammel JP, et al. Effect of small bowel obstruction on functional outcome and quality of life in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: 10-year follow-up study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:119–125.
- Donati OF, Weishaupt D, Weber A, et al. Colonic transformation of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and of the distal ileum: MRI findings. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:e185–e187.
- Hueting WE, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Sexual function and continence after ileo pouch anal anastomosis: a comparison between a meta-analysis and a questionnaire survey. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:215–218.
- Berndtsson I, Oresland T, Hulten L. Sexuality in patients with ulcerative colitis before and after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:374–379.
- Davies RJ, O'Connor BI, Victor C, et al. A prospective evaluation of sexual function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1032–1035.
- Rokke O, Iversen K, Olsen T, et al. Long-term followup of patients with active J-reservoirs after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis with regard to reservoir function, mucosal changes, and quality of life. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011;2011:430171.
- Coffey JC, Winter DC, Neary P, et al. Quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: an evaluation of diet and other factors using the Cleveland global quality of life instrument. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:30–38.
- Browne C, Shaikh F, Iqbal N, et al. Quality of life, continence and frequency of pouchitis following laparoscopic versus open colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: an Irish perspective. Ir J Med Sci. 2014;184:655?658.
- El-Gazzaz GS, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al. Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96:522–526.