365
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Translation and cultural adaption of the decisions module for colorectal cancer screening into a Swedish version – the SCREESCO questionnaire

, , , &
Pages 1248-1252 | Received 05 Jul 2017, Accepted 16 Jul 2017, Published online: 25 Jul 2017

References

  • Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut. 2015;64:1637–1649.
  • Blom H, Kilpeläinen S, Hultcrantz R, et al. Five-year experience of organized colorectal cancer screening in a Swedish population – increased compliance with age, female gender, and subsequent screening round. J Med Screen. 2014;21:144–150.
  • Wools A, Dapper EA, de Leeuw JRJ. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26:158–168.
  • Fritzell K, Stake KN, Jervaeus A, et al. The importance of people’s values and preferences in promoting colorectal cancer screening participation. Eur J Public Health 2017;2:1–5.
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, et al. Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:262–267.
  • Charles C, Gafni A. The vexing problem of defining the meaning, role and measurement of values in treatment decision-making. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3:197–209.
  • Elf M, Fröst P, Lindahl G, et al. Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments – time to begin improving quality. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;21:114.
  • Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Couper MP, Singer E, et al. The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:20S–234.
  • Couper MP, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Singer E, et al. National Survey of Medical Decisions, 2006–2007. Description of Methods. 2009. [cited 2017 Jun 29]. Available from: [http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/25983].
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Charters E. The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Educ. 2003;12:68–82.
  • Agerberg M. Bristande kontinuitet hämmar svensk sjukvård. [Lack of continuity hampers Swedish Health care]. Läkartidningen. 2014;11:C9XP.
  • Behr D. Assessing the use of back translation: the shortcomings of back translation as a quality testing method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016: 1–12. [cited 2017 Jun 29]. DOI:10.1080.
  • Arredondo EM, Mendleson T, Holub C, et al. Cultural adaption of physical activity self-report instruments. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:S37–S43.
  • Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43:5–22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.