Methods for certification in colonoscopy – a systematic review

References

• Hassan C, Rex DK, Zullo A, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2015;3:200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valori R, Rey J-F, Atkin W, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition: quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:SE88–SE105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993;165:358–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:355–366.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Chung I-K, Kim S-J, et al. An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, et al. How should we establish the clinical case numbers required to achieve proficiency in flexible endoscopy? Am J Surg. 2010;199:121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spier BJ, Durkin ET, Walker AJ, et al. Surgical resident’s training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2556–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox M, Irby DM, Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017;49:378–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szasz P, Louridas M, Harris KA, et al. Assessing technical competence in surgical trainees: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2015;261:1046–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:264–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Report and recommendations for the reauthorization of the institute of education sciences. Washington, D.C, USA: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational measurement 3 edn. New York: American Council on Education, Macmillian; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman TJ, Cook DA, Mandrekar JN. What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1159–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choung BS, Kim SH, Yoo KB, et al. Should assessment of quality indicator of colonoscopy be varied depending on the colonoscopic technique level? Dig Dis Sci. 2015;61:731–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker SK, Albrani T, Zaman A, et al. Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an assessment and self-appraisal tool. Am J Surg. 2008;196:450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, et al. Global assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopic skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1834–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle E, Al-Akash M, Patchett S, et al. Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form: Improvement of endoscopy standards. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1126–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE. The Mayo colonoscopy skills assessment tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1125–1133.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, et al. ASGE’s assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP. The validity and reliability of a direct observation of procedural skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:591–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for co. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:798–807.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1417–1424.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack RE, Baron TH, Downing SM, et al. Validation of a colonoscopy simulation model for skills assessment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:64–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, et al. Expert and constrict validity of the Simbionix GI Menter II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:158–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell RA, Kim S, Ahmad NA, et al. Poor discriminatory function for endoscopic skills on a computer-based simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:993–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, et al. Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preisler L, Svendsen MB, Nerup N, et al. Simulation-based training for colonoscopy: establishing criteria for competency. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM, et al. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:704–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller CL, Kaneva P, Fried GM, et al. Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES™ manual skills test. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3081–3085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinca KD, Cox TC, Pearl JP, et al. Validity evidence for the simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation scoring system. Am J Surg. 2014;207:218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, et al. Simulated colonoscopy objective performance evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4073–4080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CC, Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, et al. Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box. Endoscopy. 2014;46:735–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirapinyo P, Kumar N, Thompson CC. Validation of an endoscopic part-task training box as a skill assessment tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:967–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstein KL, Patil VD, Jayender J, et al. Evaluation of colonoscopy technical skill levels by use of an objective kinematic-based system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MBS, et al. Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:548–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, et al. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:971–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:S16–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meester RGS, Doubeni CA, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, et al. Variation in adenoma detection rate and the lifetime benefits and cost of colorectal cancer screening: a microsimulation model. JAMA. 2015;313:2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlack R. Assessing fellow skills: practice what you preach, measure what you teach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1425–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in health professions education. New York: Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC, Carnahan H. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, Walsh CM, editors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SG, Thomas-Gibson S, Lockett M, et al. Effect of real-time magnetic endoscope imaging on the teaching and acquisition of colonoscopy skills: results from a single trainee. Endoscopy. 2003;35:421–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar B, Roberts J, Knechtel R, et al. Comparison of self- and faculty-directed learning of psychomotor skills. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1998;3:15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz V, Holme O, Leblanc M, et al. An explorative study from the Norwegian quality register gastronet comparing self-estimated versus registered quality in colonoscopy performance. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:(3):E326–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19:1221–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Threats to the validity of clinical teaching assessments: what about rater error? Med Educ. 2005;39:353–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003;37:464–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konge L, Svendsen MB, Preisler L, et al. Combining different methods improves assessment of competence in colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:601–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar