Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis

References

• Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003;97:934–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherubl H. Rectal carcinoids are on the rise: early detection by screening endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:162–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson FC, Levy MJ, Dozois EJ, et al. Endoscopically identified well-differentiated rectal carcinoid tumors: impact of tumor size on the natural history and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony LB, Strosberg JR, Klimstra DS, et al. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (nets): well-differentiated nets of the distal colon and rectum. Pancreas. 2010;39:767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HP, Wu W, Yang S, et al. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:1345–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Xie H, Xie L, et al. Endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006;25:3443–3457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Lee SM, Park SH, et al. Endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors: conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:159– A79.
   Google Scholar
• Niimi K, Goto O, Fujishiro M, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device or endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of 24 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:443–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, Eo SJ, Shim SG, et al. Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW, et al. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:432–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang BW, Park JS, Kim HK, et al. Endoscopic resection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparison of endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6198927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Song GA, Kim DU, et al. Endoscopic treatment options for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: ESD versus EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:AB297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek IH, Kim SH. The effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal carcinoid compared with endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection: an analysis of 59 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:AB452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko H, Hirasawa K, Koh R, et al. Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of the resectability and long-term results from 46 consecutive cases. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:1489–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YW, Bang BW, Kwon KS, et al. Endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation and endoscopic submucosal resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZF, Zhang N, Ma SR, et al. A comparative study on endoscopy treatment in rectal carcinoid tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:260–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DH, Park Y, Park SH, et al. Cap-assisted EMR for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: comparisons with conventional EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SB, Kim HW, Kang DH, et al. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. WJG. 2015;21:9387–9393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishihara T, Chino A, Tamegai Y, et al. Advantage of the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared to the cap-assist endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C) in rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETS). United European Gastroenterol J. 2015;3:A558.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KO, Chung JW, Kim YJ, et al. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumor compare to endoscopic submucosal dissection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:206.
   Google Scholar
• Caplin M, Sundin A, Nillson O, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong DD, Shao LM, Cai JT. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:283–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono A, Fujii T, Saito Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:583–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe T, Kakemura T, Fujinuma S, et al. Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls. WJG. 2008;14:4054–4058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashimo Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek IH, Lim JU, Jeon JW, et al. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with conventional resection: an analysis of 74 cases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:82–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Yao LQ, Xu MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal carcinoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xiang L, Li A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors 7–16 mm in diameter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:375–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar