References
- Ross H, Steele SR, Varma M, et al. Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:5–22.
- Oresland T, Bemelman W, Sampietro G, et al. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:4–25.
- Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems with ileoanal pouches. Br J Surg. 2012;99:454–468.
- de Zeeuw S, Ahmed Ali U, Donders RA, et al. Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:843–853.
- Berndtsson I, Lindholm E, Oresland T, et al. Long-term outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: function and health-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1545–1552.
- Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2003;238:433–441.
- Wheeler JM, Banerjee A, Ahuja N, et al. Long-term function after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:946–951.
- Tulchinsky H, Dotan I, Halpern Z, et al. A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:866–873.
- Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2004;240:615–621.
- Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:387–392.
- Helavirta I, Huhtala H, Hyoty M, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis IN 1985–2009. Scand J Surg. 2016;105:73–77.
- Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:50–56.
- Mennigen R, Senninger N, Bruewer M, et al. Pouch function and quality of life after successful management of pouch-related septic complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397:37–44.
- Berndtsson IE, Carlsson EK, Persson EI, et al. Long-term adjustment to living with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:193–199.
- Wasmuth HH, Trano G, Midtgard TM, et al. Long-term function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis - function does not deteriorate with time. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:e283.
- Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2007;94:333–340.
- Farouk R, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:919–926.
- Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85:800–803.
- Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:221–228.
- Sciaudone G, Guadagni I, Pellino G, et al. The effect of pelvic septic complications on function and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single center experience. Am Surg. 2010;42:S137–S435.
- Karlbom U, Raab Y, Ejerblad S, et al. Factors influencing the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1401–1408.
- Karlbom U, Lindfors A, Pahlman L. Long-term functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:977–984.
- Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, et al. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–415.